Literature DB >> 21795499

Population sciences, translational research, and the opportunities and challenges for genomics to reduce the burden of cancer in the 21st century.

Muin J Khoury1, Steven B Clauser, Andrew N Freedman, Elizabeth M Gillanders, Russ E Glasgow, William M P Klein, Sheri D Schully.   

Abstract

Advances in genomics and related fields are promising tools for risk assessment, early detection, and targeted therapies across the entire cancer care continuum. In this commentary, we submit that this promise cannot be fulfilled without an enhanced translational genomics research agenda firmly rooted in the population sciences. Population sciences include multiple disciplines that are needed throughout the translational research continuum. For example, epidemiologic studies are needed not only to accelerate genomic discoveries and new biological insights into cancer etiology and pathogenesis, but to characterize and critically evaluate these discoveries in well-defined populations for their potential for cancer prediction, prevention and response to treatment. Behavioral, social, and communication sciences are needed to explore genomic-modulated responses to old and new behavioral interventions, adherence to therapies, decision making across the continuum, and effective use in health care. Implementation science, health services, outcomes research, comparative effectiveness research, and regulatory science are needed for moving validated genomic applications into practice and for measuring their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and unintended consequences. Knowledge synthesis, evidence reviews, and economic modeling of the effects of promising genomic applications will facilitate policy decisions and evidence-based recommendations. Several independent and multidisciplinary panels have recently made specific recommendations for enhanced research and policy infrastructure to inform clinical and population research for moving genomic innovations into the cancer care continuum. An enhanced translational genomics and population sciences agenda is urgently needed to fulfill the promise of genomics in reducing the burden of cancer. ©2011 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21795499      PMCID: PMC3189274          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  67 in total

1.  The path to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamburg; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  From genomic landscapes to personalized cancer management-is there a roadmap?

Authors:  Charles Swanton; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  Clinical cancer genomics: how soon is now?

Authors:  Barry S Taylor; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 4.  The application of genetics and genomics to cancer prevention.

Authors:  Kathleen Calzone; Daniel Wattendorf; Barbara K Dunn
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Targeting the function of the HER2 oncogene in human cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  M M Moasser
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Chromosome 6p22 locus associated with clinically aggressive neuroblastoma.

Authors:  John M Maris; Yael P Mosse; Jonathan P Bradfield; Cuiping Hou; Stefano Monni; Richard H Scott; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Edward F Attiyeh; Sharon J Diskin; Marci Laudenslager; Cynthia Winter; Kristina A Cole; Joseph T Glessner; Cecilia Kim; Edward C Frackelton; Tracy Casalunovo; Andrew W Eckert; Mario Capasso; Eric F Rappaport; Carmel McConville; Wendy B London; Robert C Seeger; Nazneen Rahman; Marcella Devoto; Struan F A Grant; Hongzhe Li; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A genome-wide association study identifies pancreatic cancer susceptibility loci on chromosomes 13q22.1, 1q32.1 and 5p15.33.

Authors:  Gloria M Petersen; Laufey Amundadottir; Charles S Fuchs; Peter Kraft; Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon; Kevin B Jacobs; Alan A Arslan; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Steven Gallinger; Myron Gross; Kathy Helzlsouer; Elizabeth A Holly; Eric J Jacobs; Alison P Klein; Andrea LaCroix; Donghui Li; Margaret T Mandelson; Sara H Olson; Harvey A Risch; Wei Zheng; Demetrius Albanes; William R Bamlet; Christine D Berg; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Julie E Buring; Paige M Bracci; Federico Canzian; Sandra Clipp; Michelle Cotterchio; Mariza de Andrade; Eric J Duell; J Michael Gaziano; Edward L Giovannucci; Michael Goggins; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; Manal Hassan; Barbara Howard; David J Hunter; Amy Hutchinson; Mazda Jenab; Rudolf Kaaks; Charles Kooperberg; Vittorio Krogh; Robert C Kurtz; Shannon M Lynch; Robert R McWilliams; Julie B Mendelsohn; Dominique S Michaud; Hemang Parikh; Alpa V Patel; Petra H M Peeters; Aleksandar Rajkovic; Elio Riboli; Laudina Rodriguez; Daniela Seminara; Xiao-Ou Shu; Gilles Thomas; Anne Tjønneland; Geoffrey S Tobias; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Jarmo Virtamo; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Zhaoming Wang; Brian M Wolpin; Herbert Yu; Kai Yu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Joseph F Fraumeni; Robert N Hoover; Patricia Hartge; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Will knowledge of gene-based colorectal cancer disease risk influence quality of life and screening behavior? Findings from a population-based study.

Authors:  Scott Ramsey; David Blough; Cara McDermott; Lauren Clarke; Robin Bennett; Wylie Burke; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 10.  Comparative effectiveness research and genomic medicine: an evolving partnership for 21st century medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Eugene C Rich; Gurvaneet Randhawa; Steven M Teutsch; John Niederhuber
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  24 in total

1.  A population approach to precision medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Marta L Gwinn; Russell E Glasgow; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Integrating genetic and genomic information into effective cancer care in diverse populations.

Authors:  L Fashoyin-Aje; K Sanghavi; K Bjornard; J Bodurtha
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Building a Platform to Enable NCD Research to Address Population Health in Africa: CVD Working Group Discussion at the Sixth H3Africa Consortium Meeting in Zambia.

Authors:  Emmanuel Peprah; Ken Wiley; Jennifer Troyer; Sally N Adebamowo; Dwomoa Adu; Bongani M Mayosi; Michele Ramsay; Ayesha A Motala; Clement Adebamowo; Bruce Ovbiagele; Mayowa Owolabi
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2016-03

4.  Charting a future for epidemiologic training.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Jonathan M Samet; Gilbert F Chavez; Megan M Davies; Sandro Galea; Robert A Hiatt; Carlton A Hornung; Muin J Khoury; Denise Koo; Vickie M Mays; Patrick Remington; Laura Yarber
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Comparative effectiveness research in cancer: what has been funded and what knowledge gaps remain?

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; V Paul Doria-Rose; Muin J Khoury; Mohammed Elzarrad; Martin L Brown; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01

7.  Trends in National Institutes of Health-Funded Congenital Heart Disease Research from 2005 to 2015.

Authors:  Kristin M Burns; Victoria L Pemberton; Charlene A Schramm; Gail D Pearson; Jonathan R Kaltman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Cancer risk assessment using genetic panel testing: considerations for clinical application.

Authors:  Susan Hiraki; Erica S Rinella; Freya Schnabel; Ruth Oratz; Harry Ostrer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Next-Generation Testing for Cancer Risk: Perceptions, Experiences, and Needs Among Early Adopters in Community Healthcare Settings.

Authors:  Kathleen R Blazer; Bita Nehoray; Ilana Solomon; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Julie O Culver; Gwen C Uman; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2015-11-05

10.  Increasing participation in genomic research and biobanking through community-based capacity building.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Maryam Husamudeen; Elaine L Larson; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.