Literature DB >> 20155263

PET imaging of HER1-expressing xenografts in mice with 86Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab.

Tapan K Nayak1, Celeste A S Regino, Karen J Wong, Diane E Milenic, Kayhan Garmestani, Kwamena E Baidoo, Lawrence P Szajek, Martin W Brechbiel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cetuximab is a recombinant, human/mouse chimeric IgG(1) monoclonal antibody that binds to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER1). Cetuximab is approved for the treatment of patients with HER1-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer. Limitations in currently reported radiolabeled cetuximab for PET applications prompted the development of (86)Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab as an alternative for imaging HER1-expressing cancer. (86)Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab can also serve as a surrogate marker for (90)Y therapy.
METHODS: Bifunctional chelate, CHX-A''-DTPA was conjugated to cetuximab and radiolabeled with (86)Y. In vitro immunoreactivity was assessed in HER1-expressing A431 cells. In vivo biodistribution, PET imaging and noncompartmental pharmacokinetics were performed in mice bearing HER1-expressing human colorectal (LS-174T and HT29), prostate (PC-3 and DU145), ovarian (SKOV3) and pancreatic (SHAW) tumor xenografts. Receptor blockage was demonstrated by coinjection of either 0.1 or 0.2 mg cetuximab.
RESULTS: (86)Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab was routinely prepared with a specific activity of 1.5-2 GBq/mg and in vitro cell-binding in the range 65-75%. Biodistribution and PET imaging studies demonstrated high HER1-specific tumor uptake of the radiotracer and clearance from nonspecific organs. In LS-174T tumor-bearing mice injected with (86)Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab alone, (86)Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab plus 0.1 mg cetuximab or 0.2 mg cetuximab, the tumor uptake values at 3 days were 29.3 +/- 4.2, 10.4 +/- 0.5 and 6.4 +/- 0.3%ID/g, respectively, demonstrating dose-dependent blockage of the target. Tumors were clearly visualized 1 day after injecting 3.8-4.0 MBq (86)Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab. Quantitative PET revealed the highest tumor uptake in LS-174T (29.55 +/- 2.67%ID/cm(3)) and the lowest tumor uptake in PC-3 (15.92 +/- 1.55%ID/cm(3)) xenografts at 3 days after injection. Tumor uptake values quantified by PET were closely correlated (r (2) = 0.9, n = 18) with values determined by biodistribution studies.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of preparation of high specific activity (86)Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab and its application for quantitative noninvasive PET imaging of HER1-expressing tumors. (86)Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab offers an attractive alternative to previously labeled cetuximab for PET and further investigation for clinical translation is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20155263      PMCID: PMC2891840          DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1370-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  35 in total

Review 1.  Targeted imaging: an important biomarker for understanding disease progression in the era of personalized medicine.

Authors:  William C Eckelman; Richard C Reba; Gary J Kelloff
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Cetuximab: preclinical evaluation of a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR for radioimmunodiagnostic and radioimmunotherapeutic applications.

Authors:  Diane E Milenic; Karen J Wong; Kwamena E Baidoo; Geoffrey L Ray; Kayhan Garmestani; Mark Williams; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Synthesis of a cross-bridged cyclam derivative for peptide conjugation and 64Cu radiolabeling.

Authors:  C Andrew Boswell; Celeste A S Regino; Kwamena E Baidoo; Karen J Wong; Ambika Bumb; Heng Xu; Diane E Milenic; James A Kelley; Christopher C Lai; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 4.774

4.  Disparity between in vivo EGFR expression and 89Zr-labeled cetuximab uptake assessed with PET.

Authors:  Hugo J W L Aerts; Ludwig Dubois; Lars Perk; Peter Vermaelen; Guus A M S van Dongen; Bradly G Wouters; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Correlating EGFR expression with receptor-binding properties and internalization of 64Cu-DOTA-cetuximab in 5 cervical cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Martin Eiblmaier; Laura A Meyer; Mark A Watson; Paula M Fracasso; Linda J Pike; Carolyn J Anderson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Clinical usefulness of EGFR gene copy number as a predictive marker in colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a fluorescent in situ hybridization study.

Authors:  Nicola Personeni; Steffen Fieuws; Hubert Piessevaux; Gert De Hertogh; Jef De Schutter; Bart Biesmans; Wendy De Roock; An Capoen; Maria Debiec-Rychter; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Marc Peeters; Yves Humblet; Eric Van Cutsem; Sabine Tejpar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Comparison of the biodistribution and tumor targeting of two 99mTc-labeled anti-EGFR nanobodies in mice, using pinhole SPECT/micro-CT.

Authors:  Lea Olive Tchouate Gainkam; Lieven Huang; Vicky Caveliers; Marleen Keyaerts; Sophie Hernot; Ilse Vaneycken; Christian Vanhove; Hilde Revets; Patrick De Baetselier; Tony Lahoutte
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Federica Di Nicolantonio; Miriam Martini; Francesca Molinari; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Sabrina Arena; Piercarlo Saletti; Sara De Dosso; Luca Mazzucchelli; Milo Frattini; Salvatore Siena; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Imaging of EGFR and EGFR tyrosine kinase overexpression in tumors by nuclear medicine modalities.

Authors:  Eyal Mishani; Galith Abourbeh; Martin Eiblmaier; Carolyn J Anderson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.116

View more
  35 in total

1.  Targeting HER2: a report on the in vitro and in vivo pre-clinical data supporting trastuzumab as a radioimmunoconjugate for clinical trials.

Authors:  Diane E Milenic; Karen J Wong; Kwamena E Baidoo; Tapan K Nayak; Celeste A S Regino; Kayhan Garmestani; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Targeting aberrant DNA double-strand break repair in triple-negative breast cancer with alpha-particle emitter radiolabeled anti-EGFR antibody.

Authors:  Hong Song; Mohammad Hedayati; Robert F Hobbs; Chunbo Shao; Frank Bruchertseifer; Alfred Morgenstern; Theodore L Deweese; George Sgouros
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  PET imaging of tumor angiogenesis in mice with VEGF-A-targeted (86)Y-CHX-A″-DTPA-bevacizumab.

Authors:  Tapan K Nayak; Kayhan Garmestani; Kwamena E Baidoo; Diane E Milenic; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Dosimetry of yttrium-labelled radiopharmaceuticals for internal therapy: 86Y or 90Y imaging?

Authors:  Stephan Walrand; Glenn D Flux; Mark W Konijnenberg; Roelf Valkema; Eric P Krenning; Renaud Lhommel; Stanislas Pauwels; Francois Jamar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Intraoperative imaging in ovarian cancer: fact or fiction?

Authors:  Lucia M A Crane; Marleen van Oosten; Rick G Pleijhuis; Arash Motekallemi; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Ate G J van der Zee; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.488

6.  In Vitro and In Vivo Pre-Clinical Analysis of a F(ab')(2) Fragment of Panitumumab for Molecular Imaging and Therapy of HER1 Positive Cancers.

Authors:  Karen J Wong; Kwamena E Baidoo; Tapan K Nayak; Kayhan Garmestani; Martin W Brechbiel; Diane E Milenic
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.138

7.  Advances in immuno-positron emission tomography: antibodies for molecular imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Scott M Knowles; Anna M Wu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Mapping biological behaviors by application of longer-lived positron emitting radionuclides.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Kwamena E Baidoo; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Development and characterization of 89Zr-labeled panitumumab for immuno-positron emission tomographic imaging of the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Albert J Chang; Ravindra A De Silva; Suzanne E Lapi
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  New whole-body multimodality imaging of gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis combining fluorescence imaging with ICG-labeled antibody and MRI in mice.

Authors:  Akihiro Ito; Yuichi Ito; Shigeru Matsushima; Daisuke Tsuchida; Mai Ogasawara; Junichi Hasegawa; Kazunari Misawa; Eisaku Kondo; Norio Kaneda; Hayao Nakanishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.