UNLABELLED: The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody cetuximab is clinically approved for the treatment of EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer and advanced head and neck cancer. Overexpression of EGFR has also been found in more than 70% of carcinomas of the cervix. The overall goal of this study was to determine whether (64)Cu-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-cetuximab has potential as an agent for measuring EGFR concentration by PET imaging in cervical cancer tumors. METHODS: Cetuximab was conjugated to the bifunctional chelator DOTA and labeled with (64)Cu. EGFR messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was correlated with EGFR densities on the cell surface of 5 different cervical cancer cell lines and with receptor function, measured by internalization of (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab. Imaging in tumor-bearing mice with small-animal PET was performed using the highest-expressing cervical cancer cell line. RESULTS: The affinity of (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab binding for the EGFR was similar in 4 EGFR-positive lines, varying from 0.1 to 0.7 nM. The mRNA expression corresponded well with EGFR densities and levels of internalization, with responses decreasing in the order of CaSki>ME-180>DoTc2 4510>HeLa>C-33A. Biodistribution and small-animal PET studies with (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab in CaSki tumor-bearing nude mice showed relatively high tumor uptake at 24 h after injection (13.2+/-1.2 percentage of injected activity per gram), although there was also significant retention of activity in the blood and liver accumulation. CONCLUSION: (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab was successfully used to detect and quantify EGFR expression in cervical cancer tumors, and small-animal PET/CT of EGFR-expressing CaSki tumors suggests potential for PET/CT of EGFR-positive tumors.
UNLABELLED: The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody cetuximab is clinically approved for the treatment of EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer and advanced head and neck cancer. Overexpression of EGFR has also been found in more than 70% of carcinomas of the cervix. The overall goal of this study was to determine whether (64)Cu-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-cetuximab has potential as an agent for measuring EGFR concentration by PET imaging in cervical cancertumors. METHODS:Cetuximab was conjugated to the bifunctional chelator DOTA and labeled with (64)Cu. EGFR messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was correlated with EGFR densities on the cell surface of 5 different cervical cancer cell lines and with receptor function, measured by internalization of (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab. Imaging in tumor-bearing mice with small-animal PET was performed using the highest-expressing cervical cancer cell line. RESULTS: The affinity of (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab binding for the EGFR was similar in 4 EGFR-positive lines, varying from 0.1 to 0.7 nM. The mRNA expression corresponded well with EGFR densities and levels of internalization, with responses decreasing in the order of CaSki>ME-180>DoTc2 4510>HeLa>C-33A. Biodistribution and small-animal PET studies with (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab in CaSkitumor-bearing nude mice showed relatively high tumor uptake at 24 h after injection (13.2+/-1.2 percentage of injected activity per gram), although there was also significant retention of activity in the blood and liver accumulation. CONCLUSION: (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab was successfully used to detect and quantify EGFR expression in cervical cancertumors, and small-animal PET/CT of EGFR-expressing CaSki tumors suggests potential for PET/CT of EGFR-positive tumors.
Authors: M R Lewis; C A Boswell; R Laforest; T L Buettner; D Ye; J M Connett; C J Anderson Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: A M Kersemaekers; G J Fleuren; G G Kenter; L J Van den Broek; S M Uljee; J Hermans; M J Van de Vijver Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ki Young Chung; Jinru Shia; Nancy E Kemeny; Manish Shah; Gary K Schwartz; Archie Tse; Audrey Hamilton; Dorothy Pan; Deborah Schrag; Lawrence Schwartz; David S Klimstra; Daniel Fridman; David P Kelsen; Leonard B Saltz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-01-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D W McCarthy; R E Shefer; R E Klinkowstein; L A Bass; W H Margeneau; C S Cutler; C J Anderson; M J Welch Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: M Saki; M Toulany; W Sihver; M Zenker; J-M Heldt; B Mosch; H-J Pietzsch; M Baumann; J Steinbach; H P Rodemann Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Tapan K Nayak; Celeste A S Regino; Karen J Wong; Diane E Milenic; Kayhan Garmestani; Kwamena E Baidoo; Lawrence P Szajek; Martin W Brechbiel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-02-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Tapan K Nayak; Kayhan Garmestani; Kwamena E Baidoo; Diane E Milenic; Martin W Brechbiel Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Kelly D Orcutt; Gregory P Adams; Anna M Wu; Matthew D Silva; Catey Harwell; Jack Hoppin; Manabu Matsumura; Masakatsu Kotsuma; Jonathan Greenberg; Andrew M Scott; Robert A Beckman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.488