Literature DB >> 18794099

Clinical usefulness of EGFR gene copy number as a predictive marker in colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a fluorescent in situ hybridization study.

Nicola Personeni1, Steffen Fieuws, Hubert Piessevaux, Gert De Hertogh, Jef De Schutter, Bart Biesmans, Wendy De Roock, An Capoen, Maria Debiec-Rychter, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Marc Peeters, Yves Humblet, Eric Van Cutsem, Sabine Tejpar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness and the pitfalls inherent to the assessment of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number (GCN) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for outcome prediction to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. The value of testing KRAS mutation status, in addition to EGFR GCN, was also explored. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: FISH analysis of 87 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab was done, recording individual GCN per cell and using different samples per tumor. Performances of published cutoff points and different summaries of EGFR GCN distribution were assessed for response prediction.
RESULTS: In our data set, two published cutoff points performed less well than in their training set, yielding positive predictive values and negative predictive values between 40.0% and 48.3% and between 81.0% and 86.5%, respectively. Among summaries of GCN distribution explored, mean and right-tailed distribution of GCN yielded the highest performances. A mean EGFR GCN > or = 2.83 provided an area under the curve of 0.71. Important heterogeneity of repeated measures of mean EGFR GCN was observed within tumors (intraclass correlation, 0.61; within-class SD, 0.40), leading to potential misclassifications of FISH status in 7 of 18 (38.8%) patients if a cutoff point were used. In multivariable analysis, EGFR GCN testing provided significant information independent of the KRAS status to predict response (P = 0.016) and overall survival (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the association between increased EGFR GCN and outcome after cetuximab. However, because of reproducibility concerns, any decision making based on published cutoff points is not warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18794099     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  66 in total

1.  Development of an integrated genomic classifier for a novel agent in colorectal cancer: approach to individualized therapy in early development.

Authors:  Todd M Pitts; Aik Choon Tan; Gillian N Kulikowski; John J Tentler; Amy M Brown; Sara A Flanigan; Stephen Leong; Christopher D Coldren; Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Christopher Korch; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Markers of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Walid Shaib; Reena Mahajan; Bassel El-Rayes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

3.  EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Shen; Hong-Lin Chen; Peng-Fei Liu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy: a family affair.

Authors:  Gregory Vlacich; Robert J Coffey
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Accomplishments in 2008 in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; Neal J Meropol; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09

6.  Guardant360 Circulating Tumor DNA Assay Is Concordant with FoundationOne Next-Generation Sequencing in Detecting Actionable Driver Mutations in Anti-EGFR Naive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Rohan Gupta; Tamer Othman; Chen Chen; Jaideep Sandhu; Ching Ouyang; Marwan Fakih
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-19

7.  PET imaging of HER1-expressing xenografts in mice with 86Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab.

Authors:  Tapan K Nayak; Celeste A S Regino; Karen J Wong; Diane E Milenic; Kayhan Garmestani; Kwamena E Baidoo; Lawrence P Szajek; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Combined assessment of EGFR-related molecules to predict outcome of 1st-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yu Sunakawa; Dongyun Yang; Miriana Moran; Stephanie H Astrow; Akihito Tsuji; Craig Stephens; Wu Zhang; Shu Cao; Takehiro Takahashi; Tadamichi Denda; Ken Shimada; Mitsugu Kochi; Masato Nakamura; Masahito Kotaka; Yoshihiko Segawa; Toshiki Masuishi; Masahiro Takeuchi; Masashi Fujii; Toshifusa Nakajima; Wataru Ichikawa; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.742

9.  A novel predictive strategy by immunohistochemical analysis of four EGFR ligands in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR antibodies.

Authors:  Michihiro Yoshida; Takaya Shimura; Mikinori Sato; Masahide Ebi; Takahiro Nakazawa; Hiromitsu Takeyama; Takashi Joh
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Accomplishments in 2008 in biologic markers for gastrointestinal cancers-focus on colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sabine Tejpar; Robert D Odze
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.