Literature DB >> 18413403

Comparison of the biodistribution and tumor targeting of two 99mTc-labeled anti-EGFR nanobodies in mice, using pinhole SPECT/micro-CT.

Lea Olive Tchouate Gainkam1, Lieven Huang, Vicky Caveliers, Marleen Keyaerts, Sophie Hernot, Ilse Vaneycken, Christian Vanhove, Hilde Revets, Patrick De Baetselier, Tony Lahoutte.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Camelidae possess an unusual class of antibodies devoid of light chains. Nanobodies are intact antigen-binding fragments that are stable, easily generated against different targets, and fully functional. Their rapid clearance from the blood circulation favors their use as imaging agents. We compared the in vivo tumor uptake and biodistribution of 2 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) Nanobodies, (99m)Tc-7C12 and (99m)Tc-7D12.
METHODS: Nanobodies were labeled via their hexahistidine tail with (99m)Tc-tricarbonyl ((99m)Tc(CO)(3)) generated from a kit. Mice bearing subcutaneous A431 (EGFR-positive) and R1M (EGFR-negative) xenografts were intravenously injected with (99m)Tc-7C12 and (99m)Tc-7D12 on separate days. Pinhole SPECT/micro-CT images were acquired at 1 h after administration to assess noninvasively the biodistribution and tumor targeting of the labeled compounds. Pinhole SPECT and micro-CT images from the same mouse were automatically fused on the basis of a mathematic rigid-body-transformation algorithm using six (57)Co sources. Images were quantified, and tracer uptake was expressed as percentage injected activity per gram per cubic centimeter (%IA/cm(3)) of tissue. Ex vivo biodistribution of mice bearing A431 injected with either (99m)Tc-7C12 or (99m)Tc-7D12 was also assessed; activity in the tumor and organs was recorded and expressed as percentage injected activity per gram (%IA/g).
RESULTS: Binding of both tracers was receptor-specific. Image analysis showed high and similar tumor uptake values for both (99m)Tc-7C12 and (99m)Tc-7D12 (4.55+/-0.24 %IA/cm(3) and 4.62+/-0.36 %IA/cm(3), respectively) in A431 xenografts, whereas the uptake in the negative tumor (R1M) was low (1.16+/-0.14 for (99m)Tc-7C12 and 1.49+/-0.60 for (99m)Tc-7D12). (99m)Tc-7C12 showed significantly higher kidney uptake (63.48+/-2.36 vs. 56.25+/-2.46 %IA/cm(3)) and lower liver uptake (2.55+/-0.26 vs. 4.88+/-0.86 %IA/cm(3)) than did (99m)Tc-7D12. The ex vivo analysis confirmed the image quantification with high tumor-to-background ratio; however, (99m)Tc-7C12 showed higher tumor uptake (9.11+/-1.12 %IA/g) than did (99m)Tc-7D12 (6.09+/-0.77 %IA/g). (99m)Tc-7D12 demonstrated significantly higher blood activity than did (99m)Tc-7C12, but both showed short plasma half-lives (<10 min).
CONCLUSION: The Nanobody fragments used here show high tumor uptake, low liver uptake, and rapid blood clearance. Nanobodies are promising probes for noninvasive radioimmunodetection of specific targets early after administration. On the basis of its favorable biodistribution, (99m)Tc-7C12 was selected for further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18413403     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.048538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  78 in total

1.  Designed hydrophilic and charge mutations of the fibronectin domain: towards tailored protein biodistribution.

Authors:  Benjamin J Hackel; Ataya Sathirachinda; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Specific targeting of atherosclerotic plaques in ApoE(-/-) mice using a new Camelid sdAb binding the vulnerable plaque marker LOX-1.

Authors:  Jens De Vos; Iris Mathijs; Catarina Xavier; Sam Massa; Ulrich Wernery; Luc Bouwens; Tony Lahoutte; Serge Muyldermans; Nick Devoogdt
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Targeting murine heart and brain: visualisation conditions for multi-pinhole SPECT with (99m)Tc- and (123)I-labelled probes.

Authors:  M Pissarek; J Meyer-Kirchrath; T Hohlfeld; S Vollmar; A M Oros-Peusquens; U Flögel; C Jacoby; U Krügel; N Schramm
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Improved quantification in single-pinhole and multiple-pinhole SPECT using micro-CT information.

Authors:  Christian Vanhove; Michel Defrise; Axel Bossuyt; Tony Lahoutte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Using microdialysis to analyse the passage of monovalent nanobodies through the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  G Caljon; V Caveliers; T Lahoutte; B Stijlemans; G H Ghassabeh; J Van Den Abbeele; I Smolders; P De Baetselier; Y Michotte; S Muyldermans; S Magez; R Clinckers
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  PET imaging of HER1-expressing xenografts in mice with 86Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab.

Authors:  Tapan K Nayak; Celeste A S Regino; Karen J Wong; Diane E Milenic; Kayhan Garmestani; Kwamena E Baidoo; Lawrence P Szajek; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Protein scaffold-based molecular probes for cancer molecular imaging.

Authors:  Zheng Miao; Jelena Levi; Zhen Cheng
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 8.  Rational chemical design of the next generation of molecular imaging probes based on physics and biology: mixing modalities, colors and signals.

Authors:  Hisataka Kobayashi; Michelle R Longmire; Mikako Ogawa; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 54.564

9.  64Cu-Labeled Gp2 Domain for PET Imaging of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.

Authors:  Max A Kruziki; Brett A Case; Jie Y Chan; Elizabeth J Zudock; Daniel R Woldring; Douglas Yee; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Imaging of EGFR expression in murine xenografts using site-specifically labelled anti-EGFR 111In-DOTA-Z EGFR:2377 Affibody molecule: aspect of the injected tracer amount.

Authors:  Vladimir Tolmachev; Daniel Rosik; Helena Wållberg; Anna Sjöberg; Mattias Sandström; Monika Hansson; Anders Wennborg; Anna Orlova
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.