Literature DB >> 20137785

Blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer in in vitro fertilization: differences in neonatal outcome?

Bengt Källén1, Orvar Finnström, Anna Lindam, Emma Nilsson, Karl-Gösta Nygren, Petra Otterblad Olausson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare neonatal outcome of blastocyst and cleavage stage embryo transfers after IVF.
DESIGN: Register study.
SETTING: Births recorded in the Swedish Medical Birth Register after IVF performed, 2002-2006. PATIENT(S): Treatments reported from all Swedish IVF clinics. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Some neonatal characteristics were compared in 1,311 infants born after blastocyst-stage transfer and 12,562 infants born after cleavage-stage transfer. Comparisons were also made with all births, 2002-2007 (n = 598,687). RESULT(S): After adjusting for year of birth, maternal age, parity, smoking habits, and body mass index, the risk of preterm birth among singletons was significantly greater after blastocyst-stage transfer than after cleavage-stage transfer. The risk of congenital malformations was also significantly higher. When the analysis was restricted to clinics where blastocyst transfers were made, the risk estimates increased for preterm birth, low birth weight, low APGAR score, and respiratory diagnoses, but did not change for congenital malformations. CONCLUSION(S): The results indicate a small increase in risk associated with blastocyst transfer, perhaps owing to the longer period of in vitro culture. There is a possibility that this effect is due, at least in part, to a selection of women for blastocyst transfers. Further studies are needed either to verify or to refute the found associations.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20137785     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  35 in total

1.  Loss of genomic imprinting in mouse embryos with fast rates of preimplantation development in culture.

Authors:  Brenna A Market Velker; Michelle M Denomme; Mellissa R W Mann
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  The impact of paternal factors on cleavage stage and blastocyst development analyzed by time-lapse imaging-a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Anton Neyer; Martin Zintz; Astrid Stecher; Magnus Bach; Barbara Wirleitner; Nicolas H Zech; Pierre Vanderzwalmen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Natural cycle IVF reduces the risk of low birthweight infants compared with conventional stimulated IVF.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Laxmi A Kondapalli; Gerard Celia; John Gordon; Michael DiMattina; Mark Payson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Morphokinetic parameters using time-lapse technology and day 5 embryo quality: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ashleigh Storr; Christos A Venetis; Simon Cooke; Daisy Susetio; Suha Kilani; William Ledger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The clinical need for a method of identification of embryos destined to become a blastocyst in assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Susan Willman; Philip Chenette; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Salim Daya; Phill Matson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-14

7.  Effect of embryo and blastocyst transfer on the birthweight of live-born singletons from FET cycles.

Authors:  Junshun Fang; Lihua Zhu; Dong Li; Zhipeng Xu; Guijun Yan; Haixiang Sun; Ningyuan Zhang; Linjun Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  (1)H NMR based profiling of spent culture media cannot predict success of implantation for day 3 human embryos.

Authors:  Paolo Rinaudo; Shehua Shen; Jia Hua; Su Qian; Uday Prabhu; Erwin Garcia; Marcelle Cedars; Dinesh Sukumaran; Thomas Szyperski; Chris Andrews
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application.

Authors:  Alice A Chen; Lei Tan; Vaishali Suraj; Renee Reijo Pera; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Quantitative and qualitative trophectoderm grading allows for prediction of live birth and gender.

Authors:  Thomas Ebner; Katja Tritscher; Richard B Mayer; Peter Oppelt; Hans-Christoph Duba; Maria Maurer; Gudrun Schappacher-Tilp; Erwin Petek; Omar Shebl
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.