Literature DB >> 22426513

The clinical need for a method of identification of embryos destined to become a blastocyst in assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Michael P Diamond1, Susan Willman, Philip Chenette, Marcelle I Cedars.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide a rationale for continuation of efforts to improve the outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes, thereby increasing the likelihood of the live birth of healthy neonates.
METHODS: Description of rationale and a framework leading to improvement in Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes.
RESULTS: The opportunity for improvement in the success rate for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcome is predicated on selection of the highest quality embryo(s) for transfer. However, such approaches must be balanced by a limit to the number of embryos transferred so as to reduce the risk for multiple births and particularly higher order multiple gestations. Blastocyst transfer offers one such successful approach, but is confounded by suggestions of an increased risk of both pregnancy complications and epigenetic disorders.
CONCLUSION: There is a need for development of approaches which, individually or in combination, may assist in the early detection of embryos destined to develop into blastocysts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22426513      PMCID: PMC3348280          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-012-9732-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  48 in total

1.  DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro or in vivo.

Authors:  Sunita Katari; Nahid Turan; Marina Bibikova; Oluwatoyin Erinle; Raffi Chalian; Michael Foster; John P Gaughan; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice?

Authors:  M Tsirigotis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review.

Authors:  Brenda Leese; Jane Denton
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.767

4.  A cycle-based model to predict blastocyst transfer cancellation.

Authors:  Lionel Dessolle; Thomas Fréour; Paul Barrière; Emile Daraï; Célia Ravel; Miguel Jean; Charles Coutant
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  The couple's decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer?

Authors:  M Blennborn; S Nilsson; C Hillervik; D Hellberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Elke D'haeseleer; Greta Verheyen; Hilde Van de Velde; Michael Camus; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Blastocyst environment and its influence on offspring cardiovascular health: the heart of the matter.

Authors:  Adam J Watkins; Tom P Fleming
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  P M Rijnders; C A Jansen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Michel Camus; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Lisbet Van Landuyt; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Updated projections of infertility in the United States: 1995-2025.

Authors:  E H Stephen; A Chandra
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  4 in total

1.  Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Vaishali Suraj; Erica J Behnke; Xinli Yang; Marlane J Angle; Jaclyn C Lambe-Steinmiller; Rachel Watterson; Kelly Athayde Wirka; Alice A Chen; Shehua Shen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application.

Authors:  Alice A Chen; Lei Tan; Vaishali Suraj; Renee Reijo Pera; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo development.

Authors:  Robert Milewski; Paweł Kuć; Agnieszka Kuczyńska; Bożena Stankiewicz; Krzysztof Łukaszuk; Waldemar Kuczyński
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.

Authors:  Bjørn Molt Petersen; Mikkel Boel; Markus Montag; David K Gardner
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 6.918

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.