Literature DB >> 23090745

(1)H NMR based profiling of spent culture media cannot predict success of implantation for day 3 human embryos.

Paolo Rinaudo1, Shehua Shen, Jia Hua, Su Qian, Uday Prabhu, Erwin Garcia, Marcelle Cedars, Dinesh Sukumaran, Thomas Szyperski, Chris Andrews.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identification of a non-invasive technique to assess embryo implantation potential in assisted reproduction would greatly increase success rates and lead more efficiently to single embryo transfer. Early studies suggested metabonomic analysis of spent culture media could improve embryo selection. The goal of this study is to assess if embryo implantation can be predicted based on proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) profiles of spent embryo culture media from patients undergoing transfer of multiple embryos on cycle day 3.
METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study in an academic assisted reproduction technology (ART) program and analyzed the data in a university research center. Two hundred twenty-eight spent culture media samples originating from 108 patients were individually analyzed. Specifically, five distinct sets (1 to 5) of different types of spent media samples (volume ~14 μL) from embryos that resulted in clinical pregnancy (positive heart rate at 6 weeks gestation) (n (1) = 29; n (2) = 19; n (3) = 9; n (4) = 12; n (5) = 33; n (total) = 102) and from embryos that did not implant (n (1) = 28; n (2) = 29; n (3) = 18; n (4) = 15; n (5) = 36; n (total) = 126) were collected on day 3 of embryo growth. The media samples were profiled using (1)H NMR spectroscopy, and the NMR profiles of sets 1 to 5 were subject to standard uni- and multi-variate data analyses in order to evaluate potential correlation of profiles with implantation success.
RESULTS: For set 1 of the media samples, a borderline class separation of NMR profiles was obtained by use of principal component analysis (PCA) and logistic regression. This tentative class separation could not be repeated and validated in any of the other media sets 2 to 5.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the rigorous technical approach, (1)H NMR based profiling of spent culture media cannot predict success of implantation for day 3 human embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23090745      PMCID: PMC3528870          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-012-9877-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  28 in total

1.  Standardization of grading embryo morphology.

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Michael Vernon; Jacob Mayer; G David Ball; Barry Behr; Kimball O Pomeroy; David Wininger; William Gibbons; Joseph Conaghan; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Standard operating procedure for metabonomics studies of blood serum and plasma samples using a 1H-NMR micro-flow probe.

Authors:  Dinesh K Sukumaran; Erwin Garcia; Jia Hua; Walter Tabaczynski; Kunle Odunsi; Chris Andrews; Thomas Szyperski
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection.

Authors:  C G Vergouw; L L Botros; P Roos; J W Lens; R Schats; P G A Hompes; D H Burns; C B Lambalk
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Guidelines on number of embryos transferred.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of human embryo culture media using Raman spectroscopy predicts embryonic reproductive potential: a prospective blinded pilot study.

Authors:  Richard Scott; Emre Seli; Kathy Miller; Denny Sakkas; Katherine Scott; David H Burns
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using Raman and near-infrared spectroscopy correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Emre Seli; Denny Sakkas; Richard Scott; Shing C Kwok; Scott M Rosendahl; David H Burns
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using proton nuclear magnetic resonance correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Emre Seli; Lucy Botros; Denny Sakkas; David H Burns
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Optimizing embryo selection with day 5 transfer.

Authors:  Andrea Reh; Elizabeth Fino; Lewis Krey; Alan Berkeley; Nicole Noyes; James Grifo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Follicular fluid content and oocyte quality: from single biochemical markers to metabolomics.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Luisa Delle Piane; Simona Casano; Emanuela Molinari; Marco Massobrio; Paolo Rinaudo
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  The effect of follicular fluid hormones on oocyte recovery after ovarian stimulation: FSH level predicts oocyte recovery.

Authors:  Mitchell P Rosen; A Musa Zamah; Shehua Shen; Anthony T Dobson; Charles E McCulloch; Paolo F Rinaudo; Julie D Lamb; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  2 in total

1.  Zygote serine decreased uptake from the fertilization medium is associated with implantation and pregnancy.

Authors:  Einat Zivi; Dinorah Barash; Einat Aizenman; Dan Gibson; Yoel Shufaro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Combining Machine Learning with Metabolomic and Embryologic Data Improves Embryo Implantation Prediction.

Authors:  Aswathi Cheredath; Shubhashree Uppangala; Asha C S; Ameya Jijo; Vani Lakshmi R; Pratap Kumar; David Joseph; Nagana Gowda G A; Guruprasad Kalthur; Satish Kumar Adiga
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.924

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.