Literature DB >> 23499001

Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application.

Alice A Chen1, Lei Tan, Vaishali Suraj, Renee Reijo Pera, Shehua Shen.   

Abstract

"Time-lapse markers," which are defined by time-lapse imaging and correlated with clinical outcomes, may provide embryologists with new opportunities for improving embryo selection. This article provides an overview of noninvasive biomarkers defined by time-lapse imaging studies. In addition to comprehensively reviewing the discovery of each time-lapse marker, it focuses on the criteria necessary for their successful integration into clinical practice, including [1] statistical and biological significance, [2] validation through prospective clinical studies, and [3] development of reliable technology to measure and quantify the time-lapse marker. Because manual analysis of time-lapse images is labor intensive and limits the practical use of the image data in the clinic, automated image analysis software platforms may contribute substantially to improvements in embryo selection accuracy. Ultimately, time-lapse markers that are based on a foundation of basic research, validated through prospective clinical studies, and enabled by a reliable quantification technology may improve IVF success rates, encourage broader adoption of single-embryo transfer, and reduce the risks associated with multiple gestation pregnancies.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23499001      PMCID: PMC4283765          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  40 in total

Review 1.  Quality assessment of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) in the andrology laboratory.

Authors:  W Krause; G Viethen
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.775

2.  Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Bruce Dziura; Sarah Quinn; Kathleen Richard
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

3.  Light exposure of the ovum and preimplantation embryo during ART procedures.

Authors:  Lars D M Ottosen; Johnny Hindkjaer; Jakob Ingerslev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology.

Authors:  Richard Lozano
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading.

Authors:  Allison E Baxter Bendus; Jacob F Mayer; Sharon K Shipley; William H Catherino
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes.

Authors:  J G Lemmen; I Agerholm; S Ziebe
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Elke D'haeseleer; Greta Verheyen; Hilde Van de Velde; Michael Camus; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Biomarkers in reproductive medicine: the promise, and can it be fulfilled?

Authors:  Stephen S Palmer; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Michel Camus; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Lisbet Van Landuyt; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.

Authors:  D A Blake; C M Farquhar; N Johnson; M Proctor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17
View more
  33 in total

1.  Possible selection of viable human blastocysts after vitrification by monitoring morphological changes.

Authors:  T Maezawa; M Yamanaka; S Hashimoto; A Amo; A Ohgaki; Y Nakaoka; A Fukuda; T Ikeda; M Inoue; Y Morimoto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Cdc25 and the importance of G2 control: insights from developmental biology.

Authors:  Cortney M Bouldin; David Kimelman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Influence of Different Quality Sperm on Early Embryo Morphokinetic Parameters and Cleavage Patterns: A Retrospective Time-lapse Study.

Authors:  Qiu-Yue Liao; Bo Huang; Si-Jia Zhang; Jing Chen; Ge Chen; Ke-Zhen Li; Ji-Hui Ai
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-29

5.  Does sperm origin affect embryo morphokinetic parameters?

Authors:  Jenna Lammers; Arnaud Reignier; Carole Splingart; Aurore Catteau; Laurent David; Paul Barriere; Thomas Freour
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Vaishali Suraj; Erica J Behnke; Xinli Yang; Marlane J Angle; Jaclyn C Lambe-Steinmiller; Rachel Watterson; Kelly Athayde Wirka; Alice A Chen; Shehua Shen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study.

Authors:  Matthew D VerMilyea; Lei Tan; Joshua T Anthony; Joe Conaghan; Kristen Ivani; Marina Gvakharia; Robert Boostanfar; Valerie L Baker; Vaishali Suraj; Alice A Chen; Monica Mainigi; Christos Coutifaris; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Biodynamic imaging of live porcine oocytes, zygotes and blastocysts for viability assessment in assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Ran An; Chunmin Wang; John Turek; Zoltan Machaty; David D Nolte
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Dysfunction in gap junction intercellular communication induces aberrant behavior of the inner cell mass and frequent collapses of expanded blastocysts in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Kazue Togashi; Jin Kumagai; Emiko Sato; Hiromitsu Shirasawa; Yuki Shimoda; Kenichi Makino; Wataru Sato; Yukiyo Kumazawa; Yasufumi Omori; Yukihiro Terada
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  The importance of the cleavage stage morphology evaluation for blastocyst transfer in patients with good prognosis.

Authors:  Daniela P A F Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita C S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.