Literature DB >> 26174125

Morphokinetic parameters using time-lapse technology and day 5 embryo quality: a prospective cohort study.

Ashleigh Storr1, Christos A Venetis, Simon Cooke, Daisy Susetio, Suha Kilani, William Ledger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate whether time-lapse parameters can aid in the prediction of day 5 embryo quality and also to assess their discriminatory capacity.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we used time-lapse technology to record specific timings of key events for 380 day 5 blastocysts (originating from 108 patients). Generalized estimating equation regression models were used to evaluate the capacity of these markers to identify a top-quality blastocyst. Multivariable regression models were also constructed, aiming to identify the model with the highest capacity to predict a top-quality blastocyst. The discriminatory capacity of single predictors or composite models was assessed with the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.
RESULTS: Eight significant predictive parameters of a top-quality blastocyst were identified: s3, t6, t7, t8, tM, tSB, tB and tEB. A ROC analysis of the identified parameters found s3 (area under the curve--AUC 0.585, 95 % CI 0.534-0.635) to have the best individual discriminatory capacity to predict a top-quality blastocyst prior to embryo compaction. The parameter tEB (AUC 0.727, 95 % CI 0.675-0.775) was the best predictor regardless of embryo stage. A model containing s3, t8 and tEB showed a slightly increased discriminatory capacity for top-quality blastocyst prediction (AUC 0.748, 95 % CI 0.697-0.794).
CONCLUSIONS: The identified morphokinetic parameters and their cutoffs, albeit of limited clinical value, add to the increasing knowledge concerning the potential predictive markers of a top-quality blastocyst. Additional evidence is necessary before validated time-lapse parameters can be used for embryo selection in IVF laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26174125      PMCID: PMC4531856          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0534-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  23 in total

Review 1.  Dissection of culture media for embryos: the most important and less important components and characteristics.

Authors:  David K Gardner
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes.

Authors:  J G Lemmen; I Agerholm; S Ziebe
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation.

Authors:  Marcos Meseguer; Javier Herrero; Alberto Tejera; Karen Marie Hilligsøe; Niels Birger Ramsing; Jose Remohí
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Connie C Wong; Kevin E Loewke; Nancy L Bossert; Barry Behr; Christopher J De Jonge; Thomas M Baer; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  External validation of a time-lapse prediction model.

Authors:  Thomas Fréour; Nicolas Le Fleuter; Jenna Lammers; Carole Splingart; Arnaud Reignier; Paul Barrière
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems.

Authors:  Basak Balaban; Kayhan Yakin; Bulent Urman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  D K Gardner; M Lane; J Stevens; T Schlenker; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  An update on embryo culture for human assisted reproductive technology: media, performance, and safety.

Authors:  Thomas B Pool
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.303

9.  Blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer in in vitro fertilization: differences in neonatal outcome?

Authors:  Bengt Källén; Orvar Finnström; Anna Lindam; Emma Nilsson; Karl-Gösta Nygren; Petra Otterblad Olausson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.

Authors:  D A Blake; C M Farquhar; N Johnson; M Proctor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17
View more
  14 in total

1.  Is early embryo development as observed by time-lapse microscopy dependent on whether fresh or frozen sperm was used for ICSI? A cohort study.

Authors:  Jessica Eastick; Christos Venetis; Simon Cooke; Ashleigh Storr; Daisy Susetio; Michael Chapman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Revealing the secret life of pre-implantation embryos by time-lapse monitoring: A review.

Authors:  Azita Faramarzi; Mohammad Ali Khalili; Giulietta Micara; Azam Agha-Rahimi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2017-05

4.  High reliability of morphokinetic annotations among embryologists.

Authors:  M Martínez; J Santaló; A Rodríguez; R Vassena
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-05-29

5.  Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  D Tran; S Cooke; P J Illingworth; D K Gardner
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Comparing prediction of ongoing pregnancy and live birth outcomes in patients with advanced and younger maternal age patients using KIDScore™ day 5: a large-cohort retrospective study with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Keiichi Kato; Satoshi Ueno; Jørgen Berntsen; Motoki Ito; Kiyoe Shimazaki; Kazuo Uchiyama; Tadashi Okimura
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin.

Authors:  K Kirkegaard; L Sundvall; M Erlandsen; J J Hindkjær; U B Knudsen; H J Ingerslev
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Delayed APC/C activation extends the first mitosis of mouse embryos.

Authors:  Anna Ajduk; Bernhard Strauss; Jonathon Pines; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Predicting pregnancy test results after embryo transfer by image feature extraction and analysis using machine learning.

Authors:  Alejandro Chavez-Badiola; Adolfo Flores-Saiffe Farias; Gerardo Mendizabal-Ruiz; Rodolfo Garcia-Sanchez; Andrew J Drakeley; Juan Paulo Garcia-Sandoval
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology.

Authors:  Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.