Literature DB >> 20126513

Synthetic Musk Fragrances in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant with Lime Softening.

William D Wombacher1, Keri C Hornbuckle.   

Abstract

Synthetic musk fragrances are common personal care product additives and wastewater contaminants that are routinely detected in the environment. This study examines the presence eight synthetic musk fragrances (AHTN, HHCB, ATII, ADBI, AHMI, musk xylene, and musk ketone) in source water and the removal of these compounds as they flow through a Midwestern conventional drinking water plant with lime softening. The compounds were measured in water, waste sludge, and air throughout the plant. HHCB and AHTN were detected in 100% of the samples and at the highest concentrations. A mass balance on HHCB and AHTN was performed under warm and cold weather conditions. The total removal efficiency for HHCB and AHTN, which averaged between 67% to 89%, is dominated by adsorption to water softener sludge and its consequent removal by sludge wasting and media filtration. Volatilization, chlorine disinfection, and the disposal of backwash water play a minor role in the removal of both compounds. As a result of inefficient overall removal, HHCB and AHTN are a constant presence at low levels in finished drinking water.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20126513      PMCID: PMC2790179          DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Eng (New York)        ISSN: 0733-9372            Impact factor:   1.860


  31 in total

1.  Environmental risk assessment for the polycyclic musks AHTN and HHCB in the EU. I. Fate and exposure assessment.

Authors:  F Balk; R A Ford
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1999-12-20       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Removal of fragrance materials during U.S. and European wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Staci L Simonich; Tom W Federle; William S Eckhoff; Andre Rottiers; Simon Webb; Darius Sabaliunas; Watze de Wolf
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Urban contribution of pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants to streams during differing flow conditions.

Authors:  Dana W Kolpin; Mary Skopec; Michael T Meyer; Edward T Furlong; Steven D Zaugg
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Environmental risk assessment for the polycyclic musks, AHTN and HHCB. II. Effect assessment and risk characterisation.

Authors:  F Balk; R A Ford
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1999-12-20       Impact factor: 4.372

5.  AHTN and HHCB show weak estrogenic--but no uterotrophic activity.

Authors:  W Seinen; J G Lemmen; R H Pieters; E M Verbruggen; B van der Burg
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1999-12-20       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 6.  Evaluation of health risks caused by musk ketone.

Authors:  H H Schmeiser; R Gminski; V Mersch-Sundermann
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.840

7.  Occurrences of pharmaceutical and personal care products as micropollutants in rivers from Romania.

Authors:  Zaharie Moldovan
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Polycyclic musk fragrances in different environmental compartments in Berlin (Germany).

Authors:  H Fromme; T Otto; K Pilz
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Synthetic musk fragrances in Lake Erie and Lake Ontario sediment cores.

Authors:  Aaron M Peck; Emily K Linebaugh; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Musk xylene: analysis, occurrence, kinetics, and toxicology.

Authors:  H U Käfferlein; T Göen; J Angerer
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.635

View more
  3 in total

1.  Designing field-based investigations of organic micropollutant fate in rivers.

Authors:  Clarissa Glaser; Marc Schwientek; Christiane Zarfl
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Synthetic Musk Fragrances in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant with Lime Softening.

Authors:  William D Wombacher; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Eng (New York)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.860

3.  Could the musk compound tonalide affect physiological functions and act as an endocrine disruptor in rainbow trout?

Authors:  N Hodkovicova; V Enevova; J Cahova; J Blahova; Z Siroka; L Plhalova; V Doubkova; P Marsalek; A Franc; E Fiorino; C Faggio; F Tichy; M Faldyna; Z Svobodova
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.881

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.