Literature DB >> 10630704

Environmental risk assessment for the polycyclic musks, AHTN and HHCB. II. Effect assessment and risk characterisation.

F Balk1, R A Ford.   

Abstract

Reports of the polycyclic musks AHTN and HHCB in surface water and fish, primarily in Europe, have prompted studies of their environmental effects. These effects then are used, along with the predicted environmental concentrations in a risk assessment according to the approach developed under European Union Regulation 793/93, in line with the Technical Guidance Document for risk assessment of new and existing chemicals. In 72-h studies with algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), NOECs were 0.374 mg/l (AHTN) and 0.201 mg/l (HHCB). In 21-day reproductive tests with daphnia (Daphnia magna) NOECs were 0.196 (AHTN) and 0.111 mg/l (HHCB). In 21-day growth tests with bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), NOECs were 0.067 (AHTN) and 0.068 mg/l (HHCB). And, finally 35-day early life stage tests with fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) resulted in NOECs of 0.035 (AHTN) and 0.068 mg/l (HHCB). These results lead to Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNEC) of 3.5 microg/l (AHTN) and 6.8 microg/l (HHCB) for aquatic organisms. For the soil compartment, 8-week studies with earthworms (Eisenia fetida) resulted in NOECs of 105 (AHTN) and 45 mg/kg (HHCB) and 4-week studies with springtails (Folsomia candida) resulted in a NOECs of 45 mg/kg for both substances. These values lead to a PNEC of 0.32 mg/kg dw for both materials. Using mammalian studies, PNECs for fish or worm eating predators of 10 mg/kg fw (AHTN) and 100 mg/kg fw (HHCB) can be derived. For sediment dwelling organisms, PNECs were derived by equilibrium partitioning using the aquatic PNECs. Comparing PNECs with the measured or predicted environmental exposures leads to risk characterisation ratios as follows: aquatic species: AHTN 0.086, HHCB 0.074; sediment organisms: AHTN 0.44, HHCB 0.064; soil organisms: AHTN 0.091, HHCB 0.10; fish eating predators: AHTN 0.012, HHCB 0.001; worm eating predators: AHTN 0.007, HHCB 0.001.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10630704     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4274(99)00170-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  8 in total

Review 1.  Aquatic processes and systems in perspective.

Authors:  Aaron M Peck; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2006-07-20

2.  Distribution and fate of synthetic musks in the Songhua River, Northeastern China: influence of environmental variables.

Authors:  Binyu Lu; Yujie Feng; Peng Gao; Zhaohan Zhang; Nan Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Occurrences and potential risks of 16 fragrances in five German sewage treatment plants and their receiving waters.

Authors:  Ursula Klaschka; Peter Carsten von der Ohe; Anne Bschorer; Sonja Krezmer; Manfred Sengl; Marion Letzel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Multilevel ecotoxicity assessment of polycyclic musk in the earthworm Eisenia fetida using traditional and molecular endpoints.

Authors:  Chun Chen; Shengguo Xue; Qixing Zhou; Xiujie Xie
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Acute and chronic toxicity of emerging contaminants, alone or in combination, in Chlorella vulgaris and Daphnia magna.

Authors:  María Victoria Pablos; Pilar García-Hortigüela; Carlos Fernández
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Synthetic Musk Fragrances in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant with Lime Softening.

Authors:  William D Wombacher; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Eng (New York)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.860

7.  Nitromusk and polycyclic musk compounds as long-term inhibitors of cellular xenobiotic defense systems mediated by multidrug transporters.

Authors:  Till Luckenbach; David Epel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Performance Comparison of Different Constructed Wetlands Designs for the Removal of Personal Care Products.

Authors:  Huma Ilyas; Eric D van Hullebusch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.