Literature DB >> 12144256

Removal of fragrance materials during U.S. and European wastewater treatment.

Staci L Simonich1, Tom W Federle, William S Eckhoff, Andre Rottiers, Simon Webb, Darius Sabaliunas, Watze de Wolf.   

Abstract

The concentrations and removals of 16 fragrance materials (EMs) were measured in 17 U.S. and European wastewater treatment plants between 1997 and 2000 and were compared to predicted values. The average FM profile and concentrations in U.S. and European influent were similar. The average FM profile in primary effluent was similar to the average influent profile; however, the concentration of FMs was reduced by 14.6-50.6% in primary effluent. The average FM profile in final effluent was significantly different from the primary effluent profile and was a function of the design of the wastewater treatment plant. In general, the removal of sorptive, nonbiodegradable FMs was correlated with the removal of total suspended solids in the plant, while the removal of nonsorptive, biodegradable FMs was correlated with 5-day Biological Oxidation Demand removal in the plant. The overall plant removal (primary + secondary treatment) of FMs ranged from 87.8 to 99.9% for activated sludge plants, 58.6-99.8% for carousel plants, 88.9-99.9% for oxidation ditch plants, 71.3-98.6% for trickling filter plants, 80.8-99.9% for a rotating biological contactor plant, and 96.7-99.9% for lagoons. The average concentration of FMs in final effluent ranged from the limit of quantitation (1-3 ng/L) to 8 microg/L. Measured FM removal and concentrations were compared to predicted values, which were based on industry volume, per capita water use, octanol-water partition coefficient, and biodegradability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12144256     DOI: 10.1021/es025503e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  Investigation of the fate and effects of acetyl cedrene on Capitella teleta and sediment bacterial community.

Authors:  Lea Ellegaard-Petersen; Henriette Selck; Anders Priemé; Daniel Salvito; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Aquatic processes and systems in perspective.

Authors:  Aaron M Peck; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2006-07-20

3.  Occurrences and potential risks of 16 fragrances in five German sewage treatment plants and their receiving waters.

Authors:  Ursula Klaschka; Peter Carsten von der Ohe; Anne Bschorer; Sonja Krezmer; Manfred Sengl; Marion Letzel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Synthetic musk fragrances in Lake Erie and Lake Ontario sediment cores.

Authors:  Aaron M Peck; Emily K Linebaugh; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Synthetic Musk Fragrances in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant with Lime Softening.

Authors:  William D Wombacher; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Eng (New York)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.860

6.  Occurrence and fate of PPCPs and correlations with water quality parameters in urban riverine waters of the Pearl River Delta, South China.

Authors:  Xin Yang; Feng Chen; Fangang Meng; Yuanyu Xie; Hui Chen; Kyana Young; Wangxing Luo; Tingjin Ye; Wenjie Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  17α-Ethinylestradiol and 17β-estradiol removal from a secondary urban wastewater using an RBC treatment system.

Authors:  R Maurício; R Dias; V Ribeiro; S Fernandes; A C Vicente; M I Pinto; J P Noronha; L Amaral; P Coelho; A P Mano
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Toxicity of synthetic musks to early life stages of the freshwater mussel Lampsilis cardium.

Authors:  M P Gooding; T J Newton; M R Bartsch; K C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Variability of release rate of flame retardants in wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Jesse Shen; Shirley Anne Smyth; Ronald Droste; Danaëlle Delâge
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.