Literature DB >> 10630703

Environmental risk assessment for the polycyclic musks AHTN and HHCB in the EU. I. Fate and exposure assessment.

F Balk1, R A Ford.   

Abstract

For the environmental exposure assessment of the fragrance ingredients 7-acetyl-1,1,3,4,4,6-hexamethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (AHTN) and 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta-gamma-2-ben zopyran (HHCB) the following properties were determined: vapour pressure 0.0682 and 0.0727 Pa; water solubility 1.25 and 1.75 mg/l; log K(ow) 5.7 and 5.9; log K(oc) 4.80 and 4.86; bioconcentration factor in fish: 597 and 1584 (fresh weight) for AHTN and HHCB, respectively. Both substances are degraded to more polar metabolites in fish, in soil and during sewage treatment. A review is made of concentrations measured in sludge, in freshwater and marine systems including suspended matter, sediment and fish. The 90th-percentile in more than 200 surface water samples is 0.3 microg/l for AHTN and 0.5 microg/l for HHCB. The 90th-percentile of the concentrations in fish is 0.12 mg/kg fresh weight for both substances (n = 27). These concentrations are lower by a factor of 5-15 than predicted on the basis of the yearly use volumes in Europe, 585 tonnes for AHTN and 1482 tonnes for HHCB. Concentrations in sludge-amended soils and in earthworms are predicted based on concentrations measured in sludge. For AHTN, the predicted values are: PECsoil, 0.029 mg/kg and PECworm, 0.065 mg/kg while for HHCB the corresponding figures are 0.032 and 0.099 mg/kg. These concentrations assume a biodegradation half-life in the soil of 180 days based on preliminary soil biodegradation data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10630703     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4274(99)00169-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  13 in total

1.  Enantiomeric composition of polycyclic musks in sediments from the Pearl River and Suzhou Creek.

Authors:  Han Song; Xiangying Zeng; Zhiqiang Yu; Delin Zhang; Shuxia Cao; Wenlan Shao; Guoying Sheng; Jiamo Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Aquatic processes and systems in perspective.

Authors:  Aaron M Peck; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2006-07-20

3.  Distribution and fate of synthetic musks in the Songhua River, Northeastern China: influence of environmental variables.

Authors:  Binyu Lu; Yujie Feng; Peng Gao; Zhaohan Zhang; Nan Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Comparison of passive sampling and biota for monitoring of tonalide in aquatic environment.

Authors:  Jitka Tumova; Katerina Grabicova; Oksana Golovko; Olga Koba; Vit Kodes; Ganna Fedorova; Roman Grabic; Hana Kocour Kroupova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Monitoring contaminants of emerging concern from tertiary wastewater treatment plants using passive sampling modelled with performance reference compounds.

Authors:  Tamanna Sultana; Craig Murray; M Ehsanul Hoque; Chris D Metcalfe
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Occurrences and potential risks of 16 fragrances in five German sewage treatment plants and their receiving waters.

Authors:  Ursula Klaschka; Peter Carsten von der Ohe; Anne Bschorer; Sonja Krezmer; Manfred Sengl; Marion Letzel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Tissue concentrations, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification of synthetic musks in freshwater fish from Taihu Lake, China.

Authors:  Xiaolan Zhang; Qing Xu; Shoukuan Man; Xiangying Zeng; Yingxin Yu; Yuping Pang; Guoying Sheng; Jiamo Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Multilevel ecotoxicity assessment of polycyclic musk in the earthworm Eisenia fetida using traditional and molecular endpoints.

Authors:  Chun Chen; Shengguo Xue; Qixing Zhou; Xiujie Xie
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Synthetic Musk Fragrances in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant with Lime Softening.

Authors:  William D Wombacher; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Eng (New York)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.860

10.  Emerging and priority contaminants with endocrine active potentials in sediments and fish from the River Po (Italy).

Authors:  Viganò Luigi; Mascolo Giuseppe; Roscioli Claudio
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.