Literature DB >> 20111641

Magnetic resonance imaging, pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: current situation and clinical perspective.

M J W Götte1, I K Rüssel, G J de Roest, T Germans, R F Veldkamp, P Knaapen, C P Allaart, A C van Rossum.   

Abstract

New developments and expanding indications have resulted in a significant increase in the number of patients with pacemakers and internal cardioverterdefibrillators (ICDs). Because of its unique capabilities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become one of the most important imaging modalities for evaluation of the central nervous system, tumours, musculoskeletal disorders and some cardiovascular diseases. As a consequence of these developments, an increasing number of patients with implanted devices meet the standard indications for MRI examination. Due to the presence of potential life-threatening risks and interactions, however, pacemakers and ICDs are currently not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in an MRI scanner. Despite these limitations and restrictions, a limited but still growing number of studies reporting on the effects and safety issues of MRI and implanted devices have been published. Because physicians will be increasingly confronted with the issue of MRI in patients with implanted devices, this overview is given. The effects of MRI on an implanted pacemaker and/or ICDs and vice versa are described and, based on the current literature, a strategy for safe performance of MRI in these patients is proposed. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:31-7.).

Entities:  

Keywords:  implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; magnetic resonance imaging; pacemaker

Year:  2010        PMID: 20111641      PMCID: PMC2810033     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  30 in total

1.  Force and torque effects of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs.

Authors:  R Luechinger; F Duru; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger; R Candinas
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators.

Authors:  S J Connolly; C R Kerr; M Gent; R S Roberts; S Yusuf; A M Gillis; M H Sami; M Talajic; A S Tang; G J Klein; C Lau; D M Newman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  MR imaging: its development and the recent Nobel Prize.

Authors:  Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Roger Luechinger; Volkert A Zeijlemaker; Erik Morre Pedersen; Peter Mortensen; Erling Falk; Firat Duru; Reto Candinas; Peter Boesiger
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Juerg Schwitter; Christian Vahlhaus; Massimo Lombardi; Josep Brugada; Panos Vardas; Angelo Auricchio; Silvia Priori; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  The epidemiology of pacemaker implantation in the United States.

Authors:  B G Silverman; T P Gross; R G Kaczmarek; P Hamilton; S Hamburger
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Timm L Dickfeld; Hugh Calkins; Robert G Weiss; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

Authors:  J Rod Gimbel; Emanuel Kanal; Kerry M Schwartz; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.

Authors:  R J Kim; E Wu; A Rafael; E L Chen; M A Parker; O Simonetti; F J Klocke; R O Bonow; R M Judd
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Magnetic resonance safety testing of a newly-developed fiber-optic cardiac pacing lead.

Authors:  Wilson Greatbatch; Victor Miller; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  14 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging, pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: current situation and clinical perspective.

Authors:  M J W Götte; I K Rüssel; G J de Roest; T Germans; R F Veldkamp; P Knaapen; C P Allaart; A C van Rossum
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  SSh versus TSE sequence protocol in rapid MR examination of pediatric patients with programmable drainage system.

Authors:  Eva Brichtová; J Šenkyřík
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  [Magnetic resonance imaging in cardiological patients : Basic principles for application].

Authors:  Bernd-Dieter Gonska
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 4.  Safety of MRIs in patients with pacemakers and defibrillators.

Authors:  Santhisri Kodali; Alex Baher; Dipan Shah
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Importance Of Delayed Enhanced Cardiac MRI In Idiopathic RVOT-VT: Differentiating Mimics Including Early Stage ARVC And Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Carlos Macias; Keijiro Nakamura; Roderick Tung; Noel G Boyle; Shivkumar Kalyanam; Jason S Bradfield
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-12-31

6.  Does heart rate influence CMR image quality of the coronary vessel wall?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; E J S Kröner; H M Siebelink; A J Scholte; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Aortic stiffness in type-1 diabetes mellitus; beware of hypertension.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; H M Siebelink; A J Scholte; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Patients' experience of outsourcing and care related to magnetic resonance examinations.

Authors:  Parvin Tavakol Olofsson; Peter Aspelin; Lott Bergstrand; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.384

9.  Utilization and likelihood of radiologic diagnostic imaging in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Matthew R Reynolds; Michael P Ryan; Steven D Wolff; Sarah A Mollenkopf; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  MRI and cardiac implantable electronic devices; current status and required safety conditions.

Authors:  A W M van der Graaf; P Bhagirath; M J W Götte
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.