| Literature DB >> 20108130 |
Abstract
Myocardial normal databases for stress myocardial perfusion study have been created by the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine Working Group. The databases comprised gender-, camera rotation range- and radiopharmaceutical-specific data-sets from multiple institutions, and normal database files were created for installation in common nuclear cardiology software. Based on the electrocardiography-gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), left ventricular function, including ventricular volumes, systolic and diastolic functions and systolic wall thickening were also analyzed. Normal databases for fatty acid imaging using (123)I-beta-methyl-iodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid and sympathetic imaging using (123)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine were also examined. This review provides lists and overviews of normal values for myocardial SPECT and ventricular function in a Japanese population. The population-specific approach is a key factor for proper diagnostic and prognostic evaluation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20108130 PMCID: PMC2855806 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-009-0337-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Nucl Med ISSN: 0914-7187 Impact factor: 2.668
Fig. 1Polar map presentation of normal myocardial SPECT databases using a 17-segment model. Average segmental values are overlaid on the maps. Upper two panels stress and rest perfusion studies with 99mTc-labeled tracers (MIBI and tetrofosmin) and 201Tl using 180° and 360° acquisition methods. Lower two panels123I BMIPP and 123I MIBG studies with 180° and 360° acquisition methods
Fig. 2Regional summed stress scores determined by Japanese 180° and 360° databases (Jp180, Jp360) and an American 180° database (US180). The normal database was applied to a Japanese patient group (n = 90) with a 360° acquisition [7]. a Regional scores in the right coronary artery (RCA) territory in males. b Those in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) territory in females. A P value in eachbar is indicated in comparison with US180 database
Normal values of left ventricular function by gated SPECT based on 16-frame gated SPECT with 99mTc-MIBI and tetrofosmin
| JSNM WG database | Males | Females |
|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 49 | 35 |
| Age (years) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 58.3 ± 13.0 | 55.6 ± 13.7 |
| EF (%) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 65.6 ± 5.9 | 71.0 ± 7.3 |
| Mean − 2SD | 53.8 | 56.4 |
| Mean + 2SD | 77.4 | 85.6 |
| EDV (mL) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 82.3 ± 16.3 | 67.4 ± 13.1 |
| Mean − 2SD | 49.7 | 41.2 |
| Mean + 2SD | 114.9 | 93.6 |
| ESV (mL) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 28.7 ± 9.0 | 20.1 ± 7.9 |
| Mean − 2SD | 10.7 | 4.3 |
| Mean + 2SD | 46.7 | 35.9 |
| EDVI (mL/m2) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 49.0 ± 8.0 | 42.3 ± 5.9 |
| Mean − 2SD | 33.0 | 30.5 |
| Mean + 2SD | 65.0 | 54.1 |
| ESVI (mL/m2) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 17.1 ± 4.8 | 12.6 ± 4.0 |
| Mean − 2SD | 7.5 | 4.6 |
| Mean + 2SD | 26.7 | 20.6 |
| Small heart (ESV <20 mL) | 22% | 51% |
JSNM WG Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine Working Group, EF ejection fraction, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, EDVI EDV index, ESVI ESV index
Comparison of normal values of left ventricular function by QGS software
| Males | Females | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean − 2SD | Mean + 2SD | Mean ± SD | Mean − 2SD | Mean + 2SD | |
| De Bondt (43 M, 59 F) [ | ||||||
| EF (%) | 59 ± 6 | 47 | 71 | 66 ± 9 | 48 | 84 |
| EDV (mL) | 106 ± 25 | 56 | 156 | 75 ± 23 | 29 | 121 |
| ESV (mL) | 44 ± 14 | 16 | 72 | 27 ± 14 | −1 | 55 |
| EDVI (mL/m2) | 54 ± 14 | 26 | 82 | 43 ± 11 | 21 | 65 |
| ESVI (mL/m2) | 23 ± 8 | 7 | 39 | 16 ± 7 | 2 | 30 |
| Ababneh (116 M, 124 F) [ | ||||||
| EF (%) | 62 ± 7 | 48 | 76 | 67 ± 8 | 51 | 83 |
| EDV (mL) | 74 ± 22 | 30 | 118 | 57 ± 17 | 23 | 91 |
| ESV (mL) | 29 ± 13 | 3 | 55 | 19 ± 11 | −3 | 41 |
| EDVI (mL/m2) | 38 ± 9 | 20 | 56 | 32 ± 8 | 16 | 48 |
| ESVI (mL/m2) | 15 ± 6 | 3 | 27 | 10 ± 5 | 0 | 20 |
| J-ACCESS (119 M, 149 F) [ | ||||||
| EF (%) | 63 ± 7 | 49 | 77 | 74 ± 9 | 56 | 92 |
| EDV (mL) | 88 ± 23 | 44 | 132 | 59 ± 17 | 25 | 93 |
| ESV (mL) | 33 ± 13 | 7 | 59 | 17 ± 10 | −3 | 37 |
| EDVI (mL/m2) | 51 ± 12 | 27 | 75 | 39 ± 11 | 17 | 61 |
| ESVI (mL/m2) | 19 ± 7 | 5 | 33 | 11 ± 6 | −1 | 23 |
| JSNM WG (68 M and 68 F) [ | ||||||
| EF (%) | 64 ± 7 | 50 | 78 | 69 ± 7 | 54 | 84 |
| EDV (mL) | 80 ± 16 | 49 | 112 | 64 ± 13 | 39 | 90 |
| ESV (mL) | 29 ± 9 | 12 | 47 | 20 ± 7 | 7 | 34 |
| EDVI (mL/m2) | 47 ± 9 | 30 | 64 | 42 ± 7 | 29 | 55 |
| ESVI (mL/m2) | 17 ± 5 | 8 | 27 | 13 ± 4 | 5 | 22 |
M males, F females
aBoth data from 180° and 360° rotation acquisition methods are added
Normal values of diastolic parameters using 16-frame gated SPECT
| JSNM WG | Nakajima [ | Akincioglu [ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | <60 years | ≥60 years | Control group | All | |
| Number of subjects | 60 | 33 | 27 | 16 | 90 |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 58 ± 15 | 48 ± 11 | 70 ± 6 | 50 ± 12 | 53 ± 11 |
| Heart rate (per min) (mean ± SD) | 66 ± 12 | 66 ± 11 | 65 ± 13 | 65 ± 7 | 74 ± 8 |
| Peak filling rate (per s) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 2.69 ± 0.57 | 2.79 ± 0.53 | 2.58 ± 0.60 | 2.46 ± 0.45 | 2.62 ± 0.46 |
| Mean − 2SD | 1.55 | 1.73 | 1.38 | 1.56 | 1.70 |
| Mean + 2SD | 3.83 | 3.85 | 3.78 | 3.36 | 3.54 |
| 1/3 mean filling rate (per s) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 1.60 ± 0.39 | 1.68 ± 0.30 | 1.51 ± 0.47 | 1.52 ± 0.25 | |
| Mean − 2SD | 0.82 | 1.08 | 0.57 | 1.02 | |
| Mean + 2SD | 2.38 | 2.28 | 2.45 | 2.02 | |
| Time to peak filling (ms)a | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 167 ± 38 | 159 ± 26 | 176 ± 48 | 166 ± 22 | 165 ± 22 |
| Mean − 2SD | 91 | 108 | 80 | 122 | 121 |
| Mean + 2SD | 243 | 210 | 273 | 210 | 208 |
| Time to peak filling/RR interval | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | |
| Mean − 2SD | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.14 | |
| Mean +2 SD | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.22 | |
| Ejection fraction (%) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 68 ± 6 | 67 ± 7 | 69 ± 7 | 68 ± 9 | 64 ± 6 |
aTime to peak filling is defined as time from end systole to PFR
Normal values of wall thickening (%) using 16-frame gated SPECT
| Males | Females | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 36 | 33 |
| Six basal segments | ||
| Mean ± SD | 24.7 ± 9.5 | 25.1 ± 9.4 |
| Mean − 2SD | 5.7 | 6.2 |
| Mean + 2SD | 43.8 | 43.9 |
| Six mid segments | ||
| Mean ± SD | 47.2 ± 9.2 | 53.0 ± 9.1 |
| Mean − 2SD | 28.8 | 34.8 |
| Mean + 2SD | 65.5 | 71.3 |
| Four apical segments | ||
| Mean ± SD | 62.6 ± 10.5 | 69.1 ± 11.3 |
| Mean − 2SD | 41.7 | 46.5 |
| Mean + 2SD | 83.5 | 91.7 |
| An apex segment | ||
| Mean ± SD | 74.2 ± 12.1 | 77.5 ± 12.1 |
| Mean − 2SD | 50.0 | 53.4 |
| Mean + 2SD | 98.4 | 101.7 |
Both data from 180° and 360° rotation acquisition methods are added [30]
Normal values of I-123 MIBG heart to mediastinum ratio
| LE collimator | ME or LME collimator | |
|---|---|---|
| JSNM WG data | ||
| Number of patients | 36 | 20 |
| Early H/M ratio | ||
| Mean ± SD | 2.39 ± 0.21 | 2.76 ± 0.31 |
| Mean − 2SD | 1.97 | 2.14 |
| Mean + 2SD | 2.81 | 3.38 |
| Delayed H/M ratio | ||
| Mean ± SD | 2.49 ± 0.25 | 3.01 ± 0.35 |
| Mean − 2SD | 1.99 | 2.31 |
| Mean + 2SD | 2.99 | 3.71 |
| Questionnaire survey in Japan [ | ||
| Number of institution | 15 | 2 |
| Early H/M ratio | ||
| Mean ± SD | 2.25 ± 0.27 | 2.78 ± 0.32 |
| Mean − 2SD | 1.71 | 2.14 |
| Mean + 2SD | 2.79 | 3.42 |
| Delayed H/M ratio | ||
| Mean ± SD | 2.36 ± 0.24 | 3.17 ± 0.29 |
| Mean − 2SD | 1.88 | 2.59 |
| Mean + 2SD | 2.84 | 3.75 |
LE low energy, ME medium energy, LME low-medium-energy, H/M heart to mediastinum