Literature DB >> 12161711

A multicenter evaluation of commercial attenuation compensation techniques in cardiac SPECT using phantom models.

Michael K O'connor1, Brad Kemp, Frank Anstett, Paul Christian, Edward P Ficaro, Eric Frey, Mark Jacobs, James N Kritzman, Robert A Pooley, Michael Wilk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to evaluate the ability of current commercially available attenuation compensation (AC) techniques to correct for the effects of attenuation, scatter, and loss of resolution with depth, in a series of standardized phantom experiments. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The following systems were evaluated: Hawkeye (GE Medical Systems), Profile (Siemens Medical Systems), Vantage Pro (ADAC Laboratories), TAC (SMV America), M-STEP (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor), TransAct (Elscint), Beacon (Marconi Systems), and PET Advance (GE Medical Systems). Studies were performed with the use of normal and ischemic myocardium in air and with technetium 99m or fluorine 18 in torso phantoms. There was considerable variation in the uniformity of short-axis slices and defect contrast for images acquired in air (no AC). AC improved the uniformity of activity throughout normal myocardium. A simulated hot liver resulted in severe artifacts and was only partially corrected by many systems. A high-quality attenuation map appears to be an important determinant of image quality. No system produced AC images of comparable quality to those obtained in the absence of scatter/attenuating media.
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the ability of commercial AC systems to reduce artifacts due to attenuation and scatter. These differences are partly the result of non-AC factors (collimation, orbit, etc). In general, systems that generated high-quality attenuation maps yielded the best results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12161711     DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2002.122676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  28 in total

1.  Effect of attenuation correction on the interpretation of 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the impact of 1 year's experience.

Authors:  Riemer H J A Slart; Tjin H Que; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Lieke Poot; Paul K Blanksma; D Albert Piers; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Attenuation compensation of cardiac SPECT: a critical look at a confusing world.

Authors:  Frans J Th Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Variation in scanning line source sensitivity: a significant source of error in simultaneous emission-transmission tomography.

Authors:  Scott G Evans; Brian F Hutton
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  C Anagnostopoulos; M Harbinson; A Kelion; K Kundley; C Y Loong; A Notghi; E Reyes; W Tindale; S R Underwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Is it time for SPECT attenuation correction?

Authors:  Denny D Watson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Monte Carlo-based down-scatter correction of SPECT attenuation maps.

Authors:  Tomislav Bokulić; Brendan Vastenhouw; Hugo W A M de Jong; Alice J van Dongen; Peter P van Rijk; Freek J Beekman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  B Hesse; K Tägil; A Cuocolo; C Anagnostopoulos; M Bardiés; J Bax; F Bengel; E Busemann Sokole; G Davies; M Dondi; L Edenbrandt; P Franken; A Kjaer; J Knuuti; M Lassmann; M Ljungberg; C Marcassa; P Y Marie; F McKiddie; M O'Connor; E Prvulovich; R Underwood; B van Eck-Smit
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Use of coronary calcium score scans from stand-alone multislice computed tomography for attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Tiziano Schepis; Oliver Gaemperli; Pascal Koepfli; Christine Rüegg; Cyrill Burger; Sebastian Leschka; Lotus Desbiolles; Lars Husmann; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Attenuation correction in cardiac SPECT: the boy who cried wolf?

Authors:  Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  How serious a problem for myocardial perfusion assessment is moderate misregistration between SPECT and CT?

Authors:  Kenneth J Nichols
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.