Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology.

Literature DB >> 17679053

Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology.

Edward P Ficaro¹, Benjamin C Lee, James N Kritzman, James R Corbett.

Abstract

Quantitative software for the analysis and review of myocardial perfusion emission computed tomography images is an indispensable tool in the nuclear physician's evaluation of patients with known or suspected heart disease. The Corridor4DM (4DM) application (formerly known as 4DM-SPECT), developed at the University of Michigan Medical Center, is a quantitative software application providing automated processing, analysis, and reporting of myocardial perfusion and function from cardiac emission computed tomography studies in a tightly integrated, user-centered environment. With health care placing increased emphasis on higher quality and efficiency in diagnostic imaging, quantitative analysis and review software applications need to provide a comprehensive environment supporting correlative review of multimodality images, integrated report generation, and remote review capabilities. The current and future design capabilities of the 4DM software application are discussed with respect to the changing landscape of imaging, where cardiac computed tomography, positron emission tomography, structured reporting, and remote review are expanding the base requirement specifications for quantitative software.

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 2007 PMID： 17679053 DOI： 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.006

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucl Cardiol ISSN： 1071-3581 Impact factor: 5.952

9 in total

Review 1. Concurrent PET/CT with an integrated imaging system: intersociety dialogue from the joint working group of the American College of Radiology, the Society of Nuclear Medicine, and the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance.

Authors: R Edward Coleman; Dominique Delbeke; Milton J Guiberteau; Peter S Conti; Henry D Royal; Jeffrey C Weinreb; Barry A Siegel; Michael F Federle; David W Townsend; Lincoln L Berland
Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 10.057

2. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: MRI validation and comparison of the Emory Cardiac Tool Box with QGS and 4D-MSPECT.

Authors: Wolfgang M Schaefer; Claudia S A Lipke; Dirk Standke; Harald P Kühl; Bernd Nowak; Hans-Juergen Kaiser; Karl-Christian Koch; Udalrich Buell
Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 10.057

3. Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors: A M Maceira; S K Prasad; M Khan; D J Pennell
Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2006 Impact factor: 5.364

4. Measurement of normal left heart dimensions using optimally oriented MR images.

Authors: S Kaul; G L Wismer; T J Brady; D L Johnston; A E Weyman; R D Okada; R E Dinsmore
Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1986-01 Impact factor: 3.959

5. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease.

Authors: G A Diamond; J S Forrester
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1979-06-14 Impact factor: 91.245

6. Variability in the measurement of regional left ventricular wall motion from contrast angiograms.

Authors: F H Sheehan; D K Stewart; H T Dodge; S Mitten; E L Bolson; B G Brown
Journal: Circulation Date: 1983-09 Impact factor: 29.690

7. Choosing apical long-axis instead of two-chamber view gives more accurate biplane echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors: Siri Malm; Einar Sagberg; Henrik Larsson; Terje Skjaerpe
Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.251

8. Three-dimensional systolic strain patterns in the normal human left ventricle: characterization with tagged MR imaging.

Authors: C C Moore; C H Lugo-Olivieri; E R McVeigh; E A Zerhouni
Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 11.105

9. Validation of QGS and 4D-MSPECT for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 18F-FDG PET: comparison with cardiac MRI.

Authors: Wolfgang M Schaefer; Claudia S A Lipke; Bernd Nowak; Hans-Juergen Kaiser; Patrick Reinartz; Arno Buecker; Gabriele A Krombach; Udalrich Buell; Harald P Kühl
Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 10.057

9 in total

96 in total

1. Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors: Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-04-25 Impact factor: 11.105

2. Quantitative Nuclear Cardiology: we are almost there!

Authors: Ernest V Garcia
Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-03-31 Impact factor: 5.952

3. Alternative methods for the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors: Wael AlJaroudi; Wael A Jaber; Richard A Grimm; Thomas Marwick; Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 2.357

4. Predictors and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony response during stress-gated positron emission tomography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors: Wael AlJaroudi; M Chadi Alraies; Venu Menon; Richard C Brunken; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber
Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 5.952