Literature DB >> 20105388

Are the lowest-cost healthful food plans culturally and socially acceptable?

Matthieu Maillot1, Nicole Darmon, Adam Drewnowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nutritious yet inexpensive foods do exist. However, many such foods are rejected by the low-income consumer. Is it because their use violates unspoken social norms? The present study was designed to assess the variety and cost of the lowest-cost market basket of foods that simultaneously met required dietary standards and progressively stricter consumption constraints.
DESIGN: A mathematical optimisation model was used to develop the lowest-cost food plans to meet three levels of nutritional requirements and seven levels of consumption constraints.
SUBJECTS: The nationally representative INCA (National Individual Survey of Food Consumption) dietary survey study of 1332 adults provided population estimates of food consumption patterns in France. Food plan costs were based on retail food prices.
RESULTS: The lowest-cost food plans that provided 9204 kJ/d (2200 kcal/d) for men and 7531 kJ/d (1800 kcal/d) for women and met specified dietary standards could be obtained for <1.50 euro/d. The progressive imposition of consumption constraints designed to create more mainstream French diets sharply increased food plan costs, without improving nutritional value.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimising diet costs, while meeting nutrition standards only, led to food plans that provided little variety and deviated substantially from social norms. Aligning the food plan with mainstream consumption led to higher costs. Food plans designed for low-income groups need to be socially acceptable as well as affordable and nutritious.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20105388      PMCID: PMC4103898          DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009993028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  32 in total

1.  Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations.

Authors:  A E Black
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-09

2.  A minimum income for healthy living.

Authors:  J N Morris; A J Donkin; D Wonderling; P Wilkinson; E A Dowler
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Food shopping practices are associated with dietary quality in low-income households.

Authors:  J Hersey; J Anliker; C Miller; R M Mullis; S Daugherty; S Das; C R Bray; P Dennee; M Sigman-Grant; A H Olivia
Journal:  J Nutr Educ       Date:  2001

Review 4.  Linear programming: a mathematical tool for analyzing and optimizing children's diets during the complementary feeding period.

Authors:  André Briend; Nicole Darmon; Elaine Ferguson; Juergen G Erhardt
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 5.  Food budget standards and dietary adequacy in low-income families.

Authors:  Michael Nelson; Katie Dick; Bridget Holmes
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.297

6.  Cost of compliance with daily recommended values of micronutrients among a cohort of Spanish university graduates: the SUN (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra) Study.

Authors:  Celeste N Lopez; Miguel A Martinez-Gonzalez; Alvaro Alonso; Almudena Sanchez-Villegas; Carmen de la Fuente; Maira Bes-Rastrollo
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  Low-income consumers' attitudes and behaviour towards access, availability and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables.

Authors:  L A Dibsdall; N Lambert; R F Bobbin; L J Frewer
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  A cost-analysis of adopting a healthful diet in a family-based obesity treatment program.

Authors:  Hollie A Raynor; Colleen K Kilanowski; Irina Esterlis; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-05

9.  EFNEP: a nutrition education program that demonstrates cost-benefit.

Authors:  Janie Burney; Betsy Haughton
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-01

10.  The affordability of a nutritious diet for households on welfare in Toronto.

Authors:  Nicholas Vozoris; Barbara Davis; Valerie Tarasuk
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb
View more
  23 in total

1.  Energy allowances for solid fats and added sugars in nutritionally adequate U.S. diets estimated at 17-33% by a linear programming model.

Authors:  Matthieu Maillot; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Chronic disease self-management within the monthly benefit cycle of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Authors:  Eliza Whiteman Kinsey; Roxanne Dupuis; Megan Oberle; Carolyn C Cannuscio; Amy Hillier
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 3.  The carbohydrate-fat problem: can we construct a healthy diet based on dietary guidelines?

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  A conflict between nutritionally adequate diets and meeting the 2010 dietary guidelines for sodium.

Authors:  Matthieu Maillot; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Toward Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; John Finley; Julie M Hess; John Ingram; Gregory Miller; Christian Peters
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2020-05-20

6.  Nutrient density of beverages in relation to climate impact.

Authors:  Annika Smedman; Helena Lindmark-Månsson; Adam Drewnowski; Anna-Karin Modin Edman
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Foods and dietary patterns that are healthy, low-cost, and environmentally sustainable: a case study of optimization modeling for New Zealand.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Nhung Nghiem; Cliona Ni Mhurchu; Helen Eyles; Michael G Baker; Tony Blakely
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Monitoring the affordability of healthy eating: a case study of 10 years of the Illawarra Healthy Food Basket.

Authors:  Peter Williams
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  The Nutrient Balance Concept: A New Quality Metric for Composite Meals and Diets.

Authors:  Edward B Fern; Heribert Watzke; Denis V Barclay; Anne Roulin; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The feasibility of achieving low-sodium intake in diets that are also nutritious, low-cost, and have familiar meal components.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Nhung Nghiem; Rachel H Foster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.