OBJECTIVE: To assess dietary costs during a family-based pediatric obesity intervention. DESIGN: Families were randomized to one of two groups. Dietary and cost data were collected from a parent or child using three 24-hour recalls: at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. SUBJECTS:Thirty-one families with an obese 8- to 12-year-old child entered treatment, with complete dietary data provided from 20 families. INTERVENTION: The 20-week behavior modification intervention emphasized increasing diet nutrient-density. Families attended group and individual sessions or group sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Energy intake; percent of energy from protein, fat, and carbohydrate; servings and percent servings from food groups classified by nutrient density; and daily food costs. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Mixed analyses of variance, with group as the between-subject factor, and time as the within-subject factor. RESULTS: No significant effect of group was found in any analyses. Significant decreases in percent overweight were observed at 6 and 12 months for children (-10.0+/-8.7 and -8.0+/-10.3, respectively) (mean+/-standard deviation) and parents (-6.7+/-10.3 and -5.3+/-14.1). Energy intake for parents and children combined significantly decreased from baseline (1,881+/-462) to 6 months (1,412+/-284), and 1 year (1,338+/-444). Servings from low-nutrient-dense foods significantly decreased from baseline (34.7+/-16.2) to 6 months (16.0+/-8.6) and 1 year (18.6+/-9.2), causing a significant increase in diet nutrient density. Dietary cost did not change at 6 months, but significantly decreased from baseline to 1 year ($6.77+/-2.41 to $5.04+/-1.80). Cost per 1,000 kcal did not significantly change. APPLICATIONS/ CONCLUSIONS: Adopting a lower-energy, nutrient-dense diet did not increase dietary costs over time. Consequently, cost should not be a barrier in the adoption of a healthful diet.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess dietary costs during a family-based pediatric obesity intervention. DESIGN: Families were randomized to one of two groups. Dietary and cost data were collected from a parent or child using three 24-hour recalls: at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one families with an obese 8- to 12-year-old child entered treatment, with complete dietary data provided from 20 families. INTERVENTION: The 20-week behavior modification intervention emphasized increasing diet nutrient-density. Families attended group and individual sessions or group sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Energy intake; percent of energy from protein, fat, and carbohydrate; servings and percent servings from food groups classified by nutrient density; and daily food costs. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Mixed analyses of variance, with group as the between-subject factor, and time as the within-subject factor. RESULTS: No significant effect of group was found in any analyses. Significant decreases in percent overweight were observed at 6 and 12 months for children (-10.0+/-8.7 and -8.0+/-10.3, respectively) (mean+/-standard deviation) and parents (-6.7+/-10.3 and -5.3+/-14.1). Energy intake for parents and children combined significantly decreased from baseline (1,881+/-462) to 6 months (1,412+/-284), and 1 year (1,338+/-444). Servings from low-nutrient-dense foods significantly decreased from baseline (34.7+/-16.2) to 6 months (16.0+/-8.6) and 1 year (18.6+/-9.2), causing a significant increase in diet nutrient density. Dietary cost did not change at 6 months, but significantly decreased from baseline to 1 year ($6.77+/-2.41 to $5.04+/-1.80). Cost per 1,000 kcal did not significantly change. APPLICATIONS/ CONCLUSIONS: Adopting a lower-energy, nutrient-dense diet did not increase dietary costs over time. Consequently, cost should not be a barrier in the adoption of a healthful diet.
Authors: James R Langabeer; Rigoberto Delgado; David Lairson; Nils P Johnson; K Lance Gould; Stefano M Sdringola Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Tonja R Nansel; Leah M Lipsky; Miriam H Eisenberg; Aiyi Liu; Sanjeev N Mehta; Lori M B Laffel Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Joseph A Hyder; Cynthia A Thomson; Loki Natarajan; Lisa Madlensky; Minya Pu; Jennifer Emond; Sheila Kealey; Cheryl L Rock; Shirley W Flatt; John P Pierce Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2009 Sep-Oct
Authors: Thomas Songer; Judith Glazner; Laura P Coombs; Leona Cuttler; Mary Daniel; Silvia Estrada; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Andrea Kriska; Lori Laffel; Ping Zhang Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Rachael W Taylor; Deirdre Brown; Anna M Dawson; Jill Haszard; Adell Cox; Elaine A Rose; Barry J Taylor; Kim Meredith-Jones; Lee Treacy; Jim Ross; Sheila M William Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 3.295