PURPOSE: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provide clinically complementary information in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Fused anatomical and physiological data acquired sequentially on separate scanners can be coregistered to accurately diagnose CAD in specific coronary vessels. METHODS: A fully automated registration method is presented utilizing geometric features from a reliable segmentation of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) volumes, where regions of myocardium and blood pools are extracted and used as an anatomical mask to de-emphasize the inhomogeneities of intensity distribution caused by perfusion defects and physiological variations. A multiresolution approach is employed to represent coarse-to-fine details of both volumes. The extracted voxels from each level are aligned using a similarity measure with a piecewise constant image model and minimized using a gradient descent method. The authors then perform limited nonlinear registration of gated MPS to adjust for phase differences by automatic cardiac phase matching between CT and MPS. For phase matching, they incorporate nonlinear registration using thin-plate-spline-based warping. Rigid registration has been compared with manual alignment (n=45) on 20 stress/rest MPS and coronary CTA data sets acquired from two different sites and five stress CT perfusion data sets. Phase matching was also compared to expert visual assessment. RESULTS: As compared with manual alignment obtained from two expert observers, the mean and standard deviation of absolute registration errors of the proposed method for MPS were 4.3 +/- 3.5, 3.6 +/- 2.6, and 3.6 +/- 2.1 mm for translation and 2.1 +/- 3.2 degrees, 0.3 +/- 0.8 degree, and 0.7 +/- 1.2 degrees for rotation at site A and 3.8 +/- 2.7, 4.0 +/- 2.9, and 2.2 +/- 1.8mm for translation and 1.1 +/- 2.0 degrees, 1.6 +/- 3.1 degrees, and 1.9 +/- 3.8 degrees for rotation at site B. The results for CT perfusion were 3.0 +/- 2.9, 3.5 +/- 2.4, and 2.8 +/- 1.0 mm for translation and 3.0 +/- 2.4 degrees, 0.6 +/- 0.9 degree, and 1.2 +/- 1.3 degrees for rotation. The registration error shows that the proposed method achieves registration accuracy of less than 1 voxel (6.4 x 6.4 x 6.4 mm) misalignment. The proposed method was robust for different initializations in the range from -80 to 70, -80 to 70, and -50 to 50 mm in the x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively. Validation results of finding best matching phase showed that best matching phases were not different by more than two phases, as visually determined. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have developed a fast and fully automated method for registration of contrast cardiac CT with gated MPS which includes nonlinear cardiac phase matching and is capable of registering these modalities with accuracy <10 mm in 87% of the cases.
PURPOSE: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provide clinically complementary information in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Fused anatomical and physiological data acquired sequentially on separate scanners can be coregistered to accurately diagnose CAD in specific coronary vessels. METHODS: A fully automated registration method is presented utilizing geometric features from a reliable segmentation of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) volumes, where regions of myocardium and blood pools are extracted and used as an anatomical mask to de-emphasize the inhomogeneities of intensity distribution caused by perfusion defects and physiological variations. A multiresolution approach is employed to represent coarse-to-fine details of both volumes. The extracted voxels from each level are aligned using a similarity measure with a piecewise constant image model and minimized using a gradient descent method. The authors then perform limited nonlinear registration of gated MPS to adjust for phase differences by automatic cardiac phase matching between CT and MPS. For phase matching, they incorporate nonlinear registration using thin-plate-spline-based warping. Rigid registration has been compared with manual alignment (n=45) on 20 stress/rest MPS and coronary CTA data sets acquired from two different sites and five stress CT perfusion data sets. Phase matching was also compared to expert visual assessment. RESULTS: As compared with manual alignment obtained from two expert observers, the mean and standard deviation of absolute registration errors of the proposed method for MPS were 4.3 +/- 3.5, 3.6 +/- 2.6, and 3.6 +/- 2.1 mm for translation and 2.1 +/- 3.2 degrees, 0.3 +/- 0.8 degree, and 0.7 +/- 1.2 degrees for rotation at site A and 3.8 +/- 2.7, 4.0 +/- 2.9, and 2.2 +/- 1.8mm for translation and 1.1 +/- 2.0 degrees, 1.6 +/- 3.1 degrees, and 1.9 +/- 3.8 degrees for rotation at site B. The results for CT perfusion were 3.0 +/- 2.9, 3.5 +/- 2.4, and 2.8 +/- 1.0 mm for translation and 3.0 +/- 2.4 degrees, 0.6 +/- 0.9 degree, and 1.2 +/- 1.3 degrees for rotation. The registration error shows that the proposed method achieves registration accuracy of less than 1 voxel (6.4 x 6.4 x 6.4 mm) misalignment. The proposed method was robust for different initializations in the range from -80 to 70, -80 to 70, and -50 to 50 mm in the x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively. Validation results of finding best matching phase showed that best matching phases were not different by more than two phases, as visually determined. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have developed a fast and fully automated method for registration of contrast cardiac CT with gated MPS which includes nonlinear cardiac phase matching and is capable of registering these modalities with accuracy <10 mm in 87% of the cases.
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; Hidetaka Nishina; Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; Cigdem Akincioglu; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Usaf E Aladl; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Oliver Gaemperli; Tiziano Schepis; Victor Kalff; Mehdi Namdar; Ines Valenta; Laurent Stefani; Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; Lars Husmann; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Yuan Xu; Paul Kavanagh; Mathews Fish; James Gerlach; Amit Ramesh; Mark Lemley; Sean Hayes; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Wolfgang M Schaefer; Claudia S A Lipke; Bernd Nowak; Hans-Juergen Kaiser; Patrick Reinartz; Arno Buecker; Gabriele A Krombach; Udalrich Buell; Harald P Kühl Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: D S Berman; H Kiat; J D Friedman; F P Wang; K van Train; L Matzer; J Maddahi; G Germano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Damini Dey; Cynthia J Lee; Muneo Ohba; Ariel Gutstein; Piotr J Slomka; Victor Cheng; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Shoji Suzuki; Arik Wolak; Ludovic Le Meunier; Louise E J Thomson; Ishac Cohen; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2008-01-15
Authors: Tracy L Faber; Cesar A Santana; Marina Piccinelli; Jonathon A Nye; John R Votaw; Ernest V Garcia; Eldad Haber Journal: IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997) Date: 2010-10-30
Authors: Jonghye Woo; Balaji Tamarappoo; Damini Dey; Ryo Nakazato; Ludovic Le Meunier; Amit Ramesh; Joel Lazewatsky; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Tracy L Faber; Cesar A Santana; Marina Piccinelli; Jonathon A Nye; John R Votaw; Ernest V Garcia; Eldad Haber Journal: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 1.679
Authors: Suicheng Gu; Xin Meng; Frank C Sciurba; Hongxia Ma; Joseph Leader; Naftali Kaminski; David Gur; Jiantao Pu Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2014-01-25 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Marina Piccinelli; Tracy L Faber; Chesnal D Arepalli; Vikram Appia; Jakob Vinten-Johansen; Susan L Schmarkey; Russell D Folks; Ernest V Garcia; Anthony Yezzi Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-11-02 Impact factor: 5.952