UNLABELLED: We have developed a software suite that automatically selects, analyses, quantitates and displays all the key image data in a myocardial perfusion SPECT study. METHODS: The files automatically selected (upon specification of the patient name) are rest and stress projections, rest and stress short axis and gated short axis files, and all 'snapshot' files. The projection data sets are presented in cine mode for evaluation of patient motion, while the lung/heart ratio at rest and stress is calculated from regions of interest (ROIs) that are automatically derived and overlayed on the LAO 45 images. Left ventricular (LV) cavity volumes at rest and stress are calculated from the short axis data sets, and the related transient ischemic dilation (TID) ratio derived and displayed. Quantitative measurements of global (ejection fraction) and regional function parameters are performed from the gated short axis dataset. All algorithms use the C++, X-Windows and OSF-Motif standards. The overall suite executes in less than 1 minute on a SunSPARC5 with 32 Mb of RAM and no proprietary hardware. RESULTS: The software was validated on 144 patients (118 rest 201T1/post-stress 99mTc-sestamibi, 18 post-stress 99mTC-sestamibi, 8 rest 201Tl) acquired on a 90 degrees dual detector (ADAC Vertex, 91 patients) and a triple detector camera (Picker Prism 3000, 53 patients). Overall, the individual algorithms for the analysis of projection, short axis and gated short axis images were successful in 622/660 (94.2%) of the images. In 80.5% of the patients (73/91 + 43/53) all algorithms executed successfully, without significant difference in success rates for 201Tl versus 99mTc-sestamibi images. CONCLUSION: Our automated approach to myocardial perfusion SPECT analysis and review is highly successful, intrinsically reproducible, and can produce time and cost savings while improving accuracy in a clinical or teleradiology-type environment.
UNLABELLED: We have developed a software suite that automatically selects, analyses, quantitates and displays all the key image data in a myocardial perfusion SPECT study. METHODS: The files automatically selected (upon specification of the patient name) are rest and stress projections, rest and stress short axis and gated short axis files, and all 'snapshot' files. The projection data sets are presented in cine mode for evaluation of patient motion, while the lung/heart ratio at rest and stress is calculated from regions of interest (ROIs) that are automatically derived and overlayed on the LAO 45 images. Left ventricular (LV) cavity volumes at rest and stress are calculated from the short axis data sets, and the related transient ischemic dilation (TID) ratio derived and displayed. Quantitative measurements of global (ejection fraction) and regional function parameters are performed from the gated short axis dataset. All algorithms use the C++, X-Windows and OSF-Motif standards. The overall suite executes in less than 1 minute on a SunSPARC5 with 32 Mb of RAM and no proprietary hardware. RESULTS: The software was validated on 144 patients (118 rest 201T1/post-stress 99mTc-sestamibi, 18 post-stress 99mTC-sestamibi, 8 rest 201Tl) acquired on a 90 degrees dual detector (ADAC Vertex, 91 patients) and a triple detector camera (Picker Prism 3000, 53 patients). Overall, the individual algorithms for the analysis of projection, short axis and gated short axis images were successful in 622/660 (94.2%) of the images. In 80.5% of the patients (73/91 + 43/53) all algorithms executed successfully, without significant difference in success rates for 201Tl versus 99mTc-sestamibi images. CONCLUSION: Our automated approach to myocardial perfusion SPECT analysis and review is highly successful, intrinsically reproducible, and can produce time and cost savings while improving accuracy in a clinical or teleradiology-type environment.
Authors: K F Van Train; E V Garcia; J Maddahi; J Areeda; C D Cooke; H Kiat; G Silagan; R Folks; J Friedman; L Matzer Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M Mazzanti; G Germano; H Kiat; P B Kavanagh; E Alexanderson; J D Friedman; R Hachamovitch; K F Van Train; D S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: C D Bavelaar-Croon; Y G America; D E Atsma; P Dibbets-Schneider; A H Zwinderman; M P Stokkel; E K Pauwels; E E van der Wall Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2001 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: T L Faber; J P Vansant; R I Pettigrew; J R Galt; M Blais; G Chatzimavroudis; C D Cooke; R D Folks; S M Waldrop; E Gurtler-Krawczynska; M D Wittry; E V Garcia Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: D E Atsma; C D Bavelaar-Croon; G Germano; P Dibbets-Schneider; B L van Eck-Smit; E K Pauwels; E E van der Wall Journal: Int J Card Imaging Date: 2000-12
Authors: Mohamed A Mandour Ali; Jamieson M Bourque; Adel H Allam; George A Beller; Denny D Watson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: David S Fieno; Louise E J Thomson; Piotr Slomka; Aiden Abidov; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Jonghye Woo; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; Victor Y Cheng; Byung-Woo Hong; Amit Ramesh; Daniel S Berman; Ronald P Karlsberg; C-C Jay Kuo; Guido Germano Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.071