BACKGROUND: Accurate alignment between cardiac CT angiographic studies (CTA) and nuclear perfusion images is crucial for improved diagnosis of coronary artery disease. This study evaluated in an animal model the accuracy of a CTA fully automated biventricular segmentation algorithm, a necessary step for automatic and thus efficient PET/CT alignment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve pigs with acute infarcts were imaged using Rb-82 PET and 64-slice CTA. Post-mortem myocardium mass measurements were obtained. Endocardial and epicardial myocardial boundaries were manually and automatically detected on the CTA and both segmentations used to perform PET/CT alignment. To assess the segmentation performance, image-based myocardial masses were compared to experimental data; the hand-traced profiles were used as a reference standard to assess the global and slice-by-slice robustness of the automated algorithm in extracting myocardium, LV, and RV. Mean distances between the automated and the manual 3D segmented surfaces were computed. Finally, differences in rotations and translations between the manual and automatic surfaces were estimated post-PET/CT alignment. The largest, smallest, and median distances between interactive and automatic surfaces averaged 1.2 ± 2.1, 0.2 ± 1.6, and 0.7 ± 1.9 mm. The average angular and translational differences in CT/PET alignments were 0.4°, -0.6°, and -2.3° about x, y, and z axes, and 1.8, -2.1, and 2.0 mm in x, y, and z directions. CONCLUSIONS: Our automatic myocardial boundary detection algorithm creates surfaces from CTA that are similar in accuracy and provide similar alignments with PET as those obtained from interactive tracing. Specific difficulties in a reliable segmentation of the apex and base regions will require further improvements in the automated technique.
BACKGROUND: Accurate alignment between cardiac CT angiographic studies (CTA) and nuclear perfusion images is crucial for improved diagnosis of coronary artery disease. This study evaluated in an animal model the accuracy of a CTA fully automated biventricular segmentation algorithm, a necessary step for automatic and thus efficient PET/CT alignment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve pigs with acute infarcts were imaged using Rb-82 PET and 64-slice CTA. Post-mortem myocardium mass measurements were obtained. Endocardial and epicardial myocardial boundaries were manually and automatically detected on the CTA and both segmentations used to perform PET/CT alignment. To assess the segmentation performance, image-based myocardial masses were compared to experimental data; the hand-traced profiles were used as a reference standard to assess the global and slice-by-slice robustness of the automated algorithm in extracting myocardium, LV, and RV. Mean distances between the automated and the manual 3D segmented surfaces were computed. Finally, differences in rotations and translations between the manual and automatic surfaces were estimated post-PET/CT alignment. The largest, smallest, and median distances between interactive and automatic surfaces averaged 1.2 ± 2.1, 0.2 ± 1.6, and 0.7 ± 1.9 mm. The average angular and translational differences in CT/PET alignments were 0.4°, -0.6°, and -2.3° about x, y, and z axes, and 1.8, -2.1, and 2.0 mm in x, y, and z directions. CONCLUSIONS: Our automatic myocardial boundary detection algorithm creates surfaces from CTA that are similar in accuracy and provide similar alignments with PET as those obtained from interactive tracing. Specific difficulties in a reliable segmentation of the apex and base regions will require further improvements in the automated technique.
Authors: Andy Tsai; Anthony Yezzi; William Wells; Clare Tempany; Dewey Tucker; Ayres Fan; W Eric Grimson; Alan Willsky Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: T H Schindler; N Magosaki; M Jeserich; U Oser; T Krause; R Fischer; E Moser; E Nitzsche; M Zehender; H Just; U Solzbach Journal: Int J Card Imaging Date: 1999-10
Authors: Philipp Bruners; Andreas H Mahnken; Christian Knackstedt; Nadja Luhmann; Elmar Spüntrup; Marco Das; Christian Hohl; Joachim E Wildberger; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Rolf W Günther; Georg Mühlenbruch Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Olivier Ecabert; Jochen Peters; Hauke Schramm; Cristian Lorenz; Jens von Berg; Matthew J Walker; Mani Vembar; Mark E Olszewski; Krishna Subramanyan; Guy Lavi; Jürgen Weese Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: M S Florentine; C L Grosskreutz; W Chang; J A Hartnett; V D Dunn; J C Ehrhardt; S R Fleagle; S M Collins; M L Marcus; D J Skorton Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1986-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Oliver Gaemperli; Tiziano Schepis; Victor Kalff; Mehdi Namdar; Ines Valenta; Laurent Stefani; Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; Lars Husmann; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Cesar A Santana; Ernest V Garcia; Tracy L Faber; Gopi K R Sirineni; Fabio P Esteves; Rupan Sanyal; Raghuveer Halkar; Mario Ornelas; Liudmila Verdes; Stamatios Lerakis; Julie J Ramos; Santiago Aguadé-Bruix; Hugo Cuéllar; Jaume Candell-Riera; Paolo Raggi Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Marina Piccinelli; Cesar Santana; Gopi Kiran R Sirineni; Russell D Folks; C David Cooke; Chesnal D Arepalli; Santiago Aguade-Bruix; Zohar Keidar; Alex Frenkel; Ora Israel; Jaume Candell-Riera; Ernest V Garcia Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 5.952