Literature DB >> 20091130

Uptake of predictive testing among relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: a multicenter study in northeastern Spain.

Judit Sanz1, Teresa Ramón y Cajal, Asunción Torres, Esther Darder, Neus Gadea, Angela Velasco, Daniel Fortuny, Consol López, David Fisas, Joan Brunet, M Carmen Alonso, Judith Balmaña.   

Abstract

Identifying a BRCA mutation among families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer enables distinguishing those who may benefit from a specific medical management. This study aimed to evaluate the uptake of predictive testing among close relatives of a proband in Spanish families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, and to determine the associated demographic and clinical predictors. A retrospective cohort of families undergoing clinical genetic testing at four university hospitals in northeastern Spain was considered. From 108 unrelated BRCA1/2 families, 765 close relatives of probands were analyzed. Sixty percent of the first-degree and 28% of the second-degree relatives underwent predictive testing within a median time of 2 and 6 months, respectively, since the mutation disclosure to the proband. Relatives undergoing genetic testing were more likely to be female, first-degree, and belong to a family with a proband who had a high educational level. Relatives were also more likely to have offspring, a previous cancer diagnosis, and to be aged between 30 and 64 years. Among second-degree relatives, having a first-degree relative with cancer was highly correlated with uptake. In conclusion, uptake of BRCA1/2 predictive testing among close relatives was notably high and within a short period of time after disclosure of the mutation to the proband. Being female, a high educational level of the proband, and having a close relative with cancer were associated with uptake among relatives. Further studies are warranted to determine whether information is disseminated properly by probands and to learn about the reasons for those not undergoing testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20091130     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9313-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  25 in total

1.  Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  K Armstrong; K Calzone; J Stopfer; G Fitzgerald; J Coyne; B Weber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Uptake of BRCA1 genetic testing in adult sisters and daughters of known mutation carriers in Norway.

Authors:  Trine Levin Bodd; Jon Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pal Moller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.

Authors:  G Geller; T Doksum; B A Bernhardt; S A Metz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Genetic uptake in BRCA-mutation families is related to emotional and behavioral communication characteristics of index patients.

Authors:  Karin Landsbergen; Chris Verhaak; Floor Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Uptake of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing in a French national sample of BRCA1 families. The French Cancer Genetic Network.

Authors:  C Julian-Reynier; H Sobol; C Sévilla; C Noguès; P Bourret
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Factors associated with an individual's decision to withdraw from genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: implications for counseling.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Annabelle Pratte; Martine Dumont; Adèle Simard-Lebrun; Jacques Simard
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2007

8.  How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family's risk for cancer? A study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; James J Dignam; Comfort N Ibe; Sogyong L Auh; Fay J Hlubocky; Shelly A Cummings; Melody White; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.

Authors:  C Molster; T Charles; A Samanek; P O'Leary
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations.

Authors:  Esme Finlay; Jill E Stopfer; Eric Burlingame; Katherine Goldfeder Evans; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara L Weber; Katrina Armstrong; Timothy R Rebbeck; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-03
View more
  11 in total

1.  The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Fred H Menko; Jacqueline A Ter Stege; Lizet E van der Kolk; Kiki N Jeanson; Winnie Schats; Daoud Ait Moha; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Communication and technology in genetic counseling for familial cancer.

Authors:  H T Lynch; C Snyder; M Stacey; B Olson; S K Peterson; S Buxbaum; T Shaw; P M Lynch
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Genetic testing in families with hereditary colorectal cancer in British Columbia and Yukon: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Vivienne K Beard; Angela C Bedard; Jennifer Nuk; Petra W C Lee; Quan Hong; James E J Bedard; Sophie Sun; Kasmintan A Schrader
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-10-19

4.  Uptake of cardiac screening and genetic testing among hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy families.

Authors:  Erin M Miller; Yu Wang; Stephanie M Ware
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Case-finding in Fabry disease: experience from the North of England.

Authors:  Paul Brennan; Oliver Parkes
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Differences in Cancer Phenotypes Among Frequent CHEK2 Variants and Implications for Clinical Care-Checking CHEK2.

Authors:  Brittany L Bychkovsky; Nihat B Agaoglu; Carolyn Horton; Jing Zhou; Amal Yussuf; Parichehr Hemyari; Marcy E Richardson; Colin Young; Holly LaDuca; Deborah L McGuinness; Rochelle Scheib; Judy E Garber; Huma Q Rana
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 33.006

7.  Uptake of BRCA1/BRCA2 predictive genetic testing in an Irish population is low: a missed opportunity.

Authors:  David E O'Reilly; Lucy Dooley; Geoffrey A Watson; Roisin Clarke; Amy Nolan; Carmel Nolan; Eileen Berkeley; Michael Farrell; Trudi McDevitt; Melissa Rogers; Catherine Clabby; David J Gallagher
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Young Israeli women with epithelial ovarian cancer: prevalence of BRCA mutations and clinical correlates.

Authors:  Limor Helpman; Omri Zidan; Eitan Friedman; Sarit Kalfon; Tamar Perri; Gilad Ben-Baruch; Jacob Korach
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Development of a Web-based Family Intervention for BRCA Carriers and Their Biological Relatives: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Usability Study.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Miyeon Jung; Ann M Schafenacker; Kara J Milliron; Kari E Mendelsohn-Victor; Sofia D Merajver; Laurel L Northouse
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2018-04-13

10.  Pediatric reporting of genomic results study (PROGRESS): a mixed-methods, longitudinal, observational cohort study protocol to explore disclosure of actionable adult- and pediatric-onset genomic variants to minors and their parents.

Authors:  Juliann M Savatt; Jennifer K Wagner; Steven Joffe; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Marc S Williams; Angela R Bradbury; F Daniel Davis; Julie Hergenrather; Yirui Hu; Melissa A Kelly; H Lester Kirchner; Michelle N Meyer; Jessica Mozersky; Sean M O'Dell; Josie Pervola; Andrea Seeley; Amy C Sturm; Adam H Buchanan
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.