Literature DB >> 11097234

Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing.

K Armstrong1, K Calzone, J Stopfer, G Fitzgerald, J Coyne, B Weber.   

Abstract

Testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 can provide important information about breast and ovarian cancer risk to a small but identifiable subgroup of women. Women who test positive for a BRCA1/2 mutation can pursue more aggressive cancer surveillance and prevention regimens. Among families with known mutations, women who test negative may avoid unnecessary interventions. Currently, little is known about the factors associated with the use of clinical BRCA1/2 testing. The objective of this study was to determine the factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing among women undergoing clinical BRCA1/2 counseling through a retrospective cohort study of women who participated in a university-based clinic offering breast cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling, and BRCA1/2 testing between January 1996 and April 1998. From the 251 eligible women who responded to a follow-up survey, 125 (50%) had undergone or were undergoing BRCA1/2 testing, 86 (34%) had decided not to undergo testing, and 40 (16%) were undecided about testing. After multivariate adjustment, we found that women who chose to undergo BRCA1/2 testing were more likely to have a known familial mutation [odds ratio (OR), 7.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-62.16], more likely to be Ashkenazi Jewish (OR, 6.37; 95% CI, 2.68-15.12), more likely to want cancer risk information for family members (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.99-4.14), more likely to want information about ovarian cancer risk (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.18-3.69), and less likely to be concerned about insurance or job discrimination (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.94). These associations were also found in the subgroup of women with a predicted probability of a BRCA1 mutation of 25%. Our study suggests that approximately half of eligible women choose to undergo clinical BRCA1/2 testing after participating in counseling. Women who have the highest risk of carrying a mutation, and thus the greatest probability of gaining some useful information from the test results, are most likely to undergo testing. Women who undergo testing are also more interested in ovarian cancer risk information and less concerned about job and insurance discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11097234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  47 in total

1.  Genetic testing and counseling for hereditary neurological diseases in Mali.

Authors:  Katherine Gloria Meilleur; Souleymane Coulibaly; Moussa Traoré; Guida Landouré; Alison La Pean; Modibo Sangaré; Fanny Mochel; Siona Traoré; Kenneth H Fischbeck; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-02-22

Review 2.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Results of an intervention for individuals and families with BRCA mutations: a model for providing medical updates and psychosocial support following genetic testing.

Authors:  Wendy McKinnon; Shelly Naud; Taka Ashikaga; Rose Colletti; Marie Wood
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Allison W Kurian; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Genetic knowledge and attitudes of parents of children with congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt; Jennifer Klima; Kelly Kelleher; Deena Chisolm; Kim L McBride
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Correlates of depressive symptoms among women seeking cancer genetic counseling and risk assessment at a high-risk cancer clinic.

Authors:  Molly Middlecamp Kodl; Judith W Lee; Alicia K Matthews; Shelly A Cummings; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The influence of health care policies and health care system distrust on willingness to undergo genetic testing.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Mary Putt; Chanita Hughes Halbert; David Grande; Jerome Sanford Schwartz; Kaijun Liao; Noora Marcus; Mirar Bristol Demeter; Judy Shea
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Value of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer in a Probability-Based US Online Sample.

Authors:  Sara J Knight; Ateesha F Mohamed; Deborah A Marshall; Uri Ladabaum; Kathryn A Phillips; Judith M E Walsh
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Mellon; James Janisse; Robin Gold; Michelle Cichon; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Withdrawal from genetic counselling for cancer.

Authors:  Eveline Bleiker; Gea Wigbout; Anja van Rens; Senno Verhoef; Laura Van't Veer; Neil Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.