Literature DB >> 17394392

Factors associated with an individual's decision to withdraw from genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: implications for counseling.

Béatrice Godard1, Annabelle Pratte, Martine Dumont, Adèle Simard-Lebrun, Jacques Simard.   

Abstract

Our study aimed to examine why individuals withdraw from genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. We explored the characteristics of 334 individuals from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families who declined genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations, when, and why they did so. Individuals who declined genetic testing were older, and a greater proportion had never developed breast or ovarian cancer. Fifty one per cent (51.1%) of individuals withdrew after the first genetic counseling session. Most of those who declined were afraid of the psychological effects of genetic testing (36.3%). The next most-cited explanations concerned logistic problems such as a limited ability to travel, lack of time, personal issues, advanced age, or health problems (21.7%). The third category included individuals who did not see any advantage in being tested (14.5%). Insurability was a concern (5.9%), mainly for men. Surprisingly, confidentiality was not a frequently reported issue (1.3%). Sixty eight per cent (68%) of individuals belonging to a family in which at least one individual has been tested withdrew after the presence of a deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation in a relative was disclosed, compared to 42% after the disclosure of a nonconclusive test result in at least one relative. Concern about the psychological effects of the result was still one of the major reasons. Several factors may influence an individual's decision to decline genetic testing; a greater understanding of these issues may help health professionals to better meet the needs and concerns of individuals from high-risk families, thus possibly improving their health outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17394392     DOI: 10.1089/gte.2006.9998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  22 in total

1.  Timing and context: important considerations in the return of genetic results to research participants.

Authors:  Kate A McBride; Nina Hallowell; Martin H N Tattersall; Judy Kirk; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Gillian Mitchell; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-05-26

2.  Factors associated with an individuals' decision to withdraw from genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations: are personality traits involved?

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Valentina Bigazzi; Carlo Leone; Gabriella Maggi; Aline Martayan; Fabio M Sega; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The Genetic Non-Discrimination Act: critical for promoting health and science in Canada.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Bev Heim-Myers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Large, Prospective Analysis of the Reasons Patients Do Not Pursue BRCA Genetic Testing Following Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Sommer Hayden; Sarah Mange; Debra Duquette; Nancie Petrucelli; Victoria M Raymond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Evaluating the performance of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) breast and ovarian genetic/familial high risk assessment referral criteria for breast cancer women in an Asian surgical breast clinic.

Authors:  Geok-Hoon Lim; Eillen Borje; John C Allen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

7.  Distress and psychosocial needs of a heterogeneous high risk familial cancer population.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John W Robinson; Peter Bridge; Francois P Bernier; Dawna M Gilchrist
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Uptake of predictive testing among relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: a multicenter study in northeastern Spain.

Authors:  Judit Sanz; Teresa Ramón y Cajal; Asunción Torres; Esther Darder; Neus Gadea; Angela Velasco; Daniel Fortuny; Consol López; David Fisas; Joan Brunet; M Carmen Alonso; Judith Balmaña
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Men in the women's world of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer--a systematic review.

Authors:  Nina Strømsvik; Målfrid Råheim; Nina Oyen; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Acceptance of genetic counseling and testing in a hospital-based series of patients with gynecological cancer.

Authors:  Nicky Dekker; Eleonora B L van Dorst; Rob B van der Luijt; Marielle E van Gijn; Marc van Tuil; Johan A Offerhaus; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.