Literature DB >> 21044964

Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: a new approach based on risk prediction.

Stuart G Baker1, Daniel J Sargent.   

Abstract

We define personalized medicine as the administration of treatment to only persons thought most likely to benefit, typically those at high risk for mortality or another detrimental outcome. To evaluate personalized medicine, we propose a new design for a randomized trial that makes efficient use of high-throughput data (such as gene expression microarrays) and clinical data (such as tumor stage) collected at baseline from all participants. Under this design for a randomized trial involving experimental and control arms with a survival outcome, investigators first estimate the risk of mortality in the control arm based on the high-throughput and clinical data. Then investigators use data from both randomization arms to estimate both the effect of treatment among all participants and among participants in the highest prespecified category of risk. This design requires only an 18.1% increase in sample size compared with a standard randomized trial. A trial based on this design that has a 90% power to detect a realistic increase in survival from 70% to 80% among all participants, would also have a 90% power to detect an increase in survival from 50% to 73% in the highest quintile of risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044964      PMCID: PMC2994862          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  13 in total

1.  Adaptive signature design: an adaptive clinical trial design for generating and prospectively testing a gene expression signature for sensitive patients.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Use of genomic signatures in therapeutics development in oncology and other diseases.

Authors:  R Simon; S-J Wang
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: design issues.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Lisa M McShane; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification.

Authors:  David M Kent; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Potential impact of genetic testing on cancer prevention trials, using breast cancer as an example.

Authors:  S G Baker; L S Freedman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Barbara A Conley; Carmen Allegra; Laurence Collette
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prognostic score in liver cirrhosis developed using the Cox's proportional hazard regression model.

Authors:  M Casaril; R Micciolo; G B Gabrielli; G Bellisola; R Corrocher
Journal:  Ric Clin Lab       Date:  1987 Jan-Mar

8.  The cross-validated adaptive signature design.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Wenyu Jiang; Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Five-year data and prognostic factor analysis of oxaliplatin and irinotecan combinations for advanced colorectal cancer: N9741.

Authors:  Hanna K Sanoff; Daniel J Sargent; Megan E Campbell; Roscoe F Morton; Charles S Fuchs; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Stephen K Williamson; Brian P Findlay; Henry C Pitot; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Identifying genes that contribute most to good classification in microarrays.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects.

Authors:  David M Kent; Ewout Steyerberg; David van Klaveren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-10

2.  Simplifying electronic data capture in clinical trials: workflow embedded image and biosignal file integration and analysis via web services.

Authors:  Daniel Haak; Christian Samsel; Johan Gehlen; Stephan Jonas; Thomas M Deserno
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Incorporation of prognostic and predictive factors into glioma clinical trials.

Authors:  Derek R Johnson; Evanthia Galanis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Exploiting high-throughput cell line drug screening studies to identify candidate therapeutic agents in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Anthony C Nichols; Morgan Black; John Yoo; Nicole Pinto; Andrew Fernandes; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Paul C Boutros; John W Barrett
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  Nipple discharge of CA15-3, CA125, CEA and TSGF as a new biomarker panel for breast cancer.

Authors:  Gangping Wang; Yan Qin; Junxi Zhang; Jinhui Zhao; Yun'ai Liang; Zuofeng Zhang; Meihua Qin; Yanqing Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Innovative methods for the identification of predictive biomarker signatures in oncology: Application to bevacizumab.

Authors:  Paul Delmar; Cornelia Irl; Lu Tian
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-01-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.