Literature DB >> 20085195

Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Carolyn J Brown1, Paul J Abbas, Christine P Etlert, Sara O'Brient, Jacob J Oleson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the early 1990s, it has been possible to measure electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) from Nucleus cochlear implant users. Recording the ECAP does not require active participation by the subject, and the recordings are not adversely affected by attention or sleep, making this response an ideal tool for monitoring long-term changes. Previous research from our laboratory (Hughes et al, 2001) has shown that ECAP thresholds and slope of the ECAP growth functions are relatively stable over time. However, this conclusion was based on results obtained from a fairly limited number of study participants, each of whom used the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant and were followed for less than two years.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of long-term use of a cochlear implant on ECAP thresholds and slope of the ECAP input/output function for both pediatric and adult cochlear implant recipients. RESEARCH
DESIGN: A longitudinal study that describes how ECAP thresholds and growth functions change over a period of 96 mo following initial activation. Changes over time in ECAP threshold and slope of the ECAP growth function were analyzed, and effects of the subject's age, type of CI (cochlear implant), and stimulating electrode are included in the analysis. STUDY SAMPLE: 134 Nucleus CI users participated in this study. All were profoundly deaf. This subject pool included 84 individuals (40 adults and 44 children) who used the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant and 50 individuals (21 adults and 29 children) who used the Nucleus CI24R cochlear implant. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Electrodes 5, 10, 15, and 20 were stimulated, and ECAP growth functions were measured for each subject at regular intervals following the initial activation of the device.
RESULTS: Small increases in mean ECAP thresholds were observed for both pediatric and adult CI users between an "early" visit that occurred within 3-6 mo following hookup and a "late" visit that occurred 4.8-6 yr later. For adults, the average increase in ECAP threshold was 3.94 CL (clinical programming units for Nucleus CIs). For children, the average increase was 4.16 CL. These differences, while small, were statistically significant. Slope of the ECAP growth functions measured over the same time interval did not change significantly. On average, pediatric CI users had ECAP thresholds that were 4-5 CL units higher than the adult CI recipients. The most striking outcome from this study, however, was the finding that when compared with postlingually deafened adults, pediatric CI users had ECAP growth functions that were substantially steeper. The differences between the results obtained from children and those obtained from adults were statistically significant and largely independent of device type or stimulating electrode.
CONCLUSION: Results from this study show ECAP thresholds and growth functions to change very little over a 5-6 yr observation interval suggesting that long-term use of a CI is not likely to have a significant negative impact on the response of the peripheral auditory system. Pediatric CI users were shown to have, on average, higher ECAP thresholds and steeper ECAP growth functions than postlingually deafened adult CI users. This finding suggests potential differences between the two patient populations either in terms of the current fields within the cochlea or the effective distance between the stimulating electrode and the stimulable neural tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20085195      PMCID: PMC2881552          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.1.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  24 in total

1.  7-year speech perception results and the effects of age, residual hearing and preimplant speech perception in prelingually deaf children using the Nucleus and Clarion cochlear implants.

Authors:  R S Tyler; D M Kelsay; H F Teagle; J T Rubinstein; B J Gantz; A M Christ
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000

2.  Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant.

Authors:  Yael Henkin; Ricky Kaplan-Neeman; Chava Muchnik; Jona Kronenberg; Minka Hildesheimer
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Longitudinal behaviour of neural response telemetry (NRT) data and clinical implications.

Authors:  Wai Kong Lai; Mehmet Aksit; Ferda Akdas; Norbert Dillier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results.

Authors:  Aaron J Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli; Steven J Staller; Patti L Arndt; Anne Cosgriff; Kiara Ebinger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The histiotypic organization of the hypertrophic scar in humans.

Authors:  H A Linares; C W Kischer; M Dobrkovsky; D L Larson
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L Smith; F B Simmons
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential.

Authors:  C A Miller; P J Abbas; C J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  M L Hughes; K R Vander Werff; C J Brown; P J Abbas; D M Kelsay; H F Teagle; M W Lowder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Siu-Ling Chi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Andrew M Rabah; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Teymouri; Timothy E Hullar; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Recommendations for Measuring the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Xiuhua Chao; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Lei Xu; Holly F B Teagle; Lisa R Park; Kevin D Brown; Michelle Shannon; Cynthia Warner; Angela Pellittieri; William J Riggs
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; I Todt; A Ernst; G Rademacher; S Mutze; S Göricke; M Schlamann; R Ramalingam; S Lang; F Christov; D Arweiler-Harbeck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Cochlear implant-evoked cortical activation in children with cochlear nerve deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; John Grose; Anna X Hang; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Viral D Tejani; Julia K Omtvedt; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Jacob J Oleson; Marie V Ozanne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Using the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap effect to select electrode stimulation sites in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.672

10.  A Broadly Applicable Method for Characterizing the Slope of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude Growth Function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Dyan Ramekers; Deborah J Colesa; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.