Literature DB >> 18515023

The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system.

Charles A Miller1, Carolyn J Brown, Paul J Abbas, Siu-Ling Chi.   

Abstract

The auditory nerve is the obligatory pathway between the cochlea and the central nervous system. As the fibers of the mammalian auditory nerve share with each other many response properties when stimulated electrically (Kiang, 1965), it is reasonable to assume that the summed, or gross, electrical response of a fiber ensemble can provide researchers with meaningful information about nerve function. This chapter describes the gross responses of the auditory nerve that can be evoked by stimuli delivered by one or more electrodes implanted within the cochlea. Two manifestations of this potential--the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR)--are introduced and compared. Some implant devices include systems that allow ECAPs to be routinely recorded from electrodes within the cochlea in clinical settings. While such systems have increased the popularity of the ECAP, unique advantages of the EABR are noted. Both potentials have assisted the clinical management of implant recipients and increase our understanding of how the human auditory system responds to electrical stimulation. The goals of this chapter are to review response characteristics of the whole-nerve response, the extent to which they provide information about underlying auditory nerve fiber activity, and limitations to their interpretation. This report will focus on describing and reviewing data collected from various clinical studies and interpreting these results on the basis of theoretical considerations and pertinent results from animal studies. Future research directions, which will likely involve the integration of various dimensions of the electrically evoked response that have been studied in isolation, are also suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18515023     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  35 in total

1.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

Review 2.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Neural origin of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

Review 5.  Importance of cochlear health for implant function.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Ning Zhou; Deborah J Colesa; Melissa M Watts; Stefan B Strahl; Soha N Garadat; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Cameron L Budenz; Yehoash Raphael; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Measurement of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Brandon D Swan; David T Brocker; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Recommendations for Measuring the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Xiuhua Chao; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Lei Xu; Holly F B Teagle; Lisa R Park; Kevin D Brown; Michelle Shannon; Cynthia Warner; Angela Pellittieri; William J Riggs
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29

10.  Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Christine P Etlert; Sara O'Brient; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.