Literature DB >> 12748969

Experience with breast cancer, pre-screening perceived susceptibility and the psychological impact of screening.

Pilvikki Absetz1, Arja R Aro, Stephen R Sutton.   

Abstract

This prospective study examined whether the psychological impact of organized mammography screening is influenced by women's pre-existing experience with breast cancer and perceived susceptibility (PS) to the disease. From a target population of 16,886, a random sample of women with a normal screening finding and all women with a false positive or a benign biopsy finding were included (N=1942). Data were collected with postal questionnaires 1-month before screening invitation and 2 and 12 months after screening. Response rate was 63% at baseline; 86, and 80% of the baseline participants responded to the follow-ups. Psychological impact was measured as anxiety (STAI-S), depression (BDI), health-related concerns (IAS), and breast cancer-specific beliefs and concerns. Data was analyzed with repeated measures analyses of variance, with estimates of effect size based on Eta-squared. Women with breast cancer experience had higher risk perception already before screening invitation; after screening they were also more distressed. Women with high PS were more distressed than women with low PS also at pre-invitation. The distress was not alleviated by screening, but instead remained even after normal mammograms. Experience and PS did not influence responses to different screening findings. Of the finding groups, false positives experienced most adverse effects: their risk perception increased and they reported most post-screening breast cancer-specific concerns. Furthermore, they became more frequent in breast self-examination (BSE) despite a simultaneous decrease in BSE self-efficacy. Our findings suggest that women with high PS and women with false positive screening finding may need individualized counseling and follow-up as much as women with a family history of breast cancer. Besides medical risk factors, women's own perceptions of susceptibility should be discussed during the screening process. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12748969     DOI: 10.1002/pon.644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  14 in total

1.  How Many of the Biopsy Decisions Taken at Inexperienced Breast Radiology Units Were Correct?

Authors:  Özlem Demircioğlu; Meral Uluer; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2017-01-01

2.  Risk estimation, anxiety, and breast cancer worry in women at risk for breast cancer: A single-arm trial of personalized risk communication.

Authors:  Zhuoer Xie; Neil Wenger; Annette L Stanton; Karen Sepucha; Celia Kaplan; Lisa Madlensky; David Elashoff; Jacqueline Trent; Antonia Petruse; Liliana Johansen; Tracy Layton; Arash Naeim
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Pancreatic cancer risk counselling and screening: impact on perceived risk and psychological functioning.

Authors:  Christine Maheu; Andrea Vodermaier; Heidi Rothenmund; Steve Gallinger; Paola Ardiles; Kara Semotiuk; Spring Holter; Saumea Thayalan; Mary Jane Esplen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Diagnostic invasiveness and psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography.

Authors:  Bruno Heleno; Volkert Dirk Siersma; John Brodersen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Clinical, demographic, and situational factors linked to distress associated with benign breast biopsy.

Authors:  Rachel F Steffens; Heather R Wright; Molly Y Hester; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2011

6.  Initial development of the Temporary Utilities Index: a multiattribute system for classifying the functional health impact of diagnostic testing.

Authors:  J Shannon Swan; Jun Ying; James Stahl; Chung Yin Kong; Beverly Moy; Jessica Roy; Elkan Halpern
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Risk perceptions among participants undergoing lung cancer screening: baseline results from the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Elyse R Park; Jamie S Ostroff; William Rakowski; Ilana F Gareen; Michael A Diefenbach; Sandra Feibelmann; Nancy A Rigotti
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2009-08-27

8.  Negative affect differentiation and adherence during treatment for thalassemia.

Authors:  Karin G Coifman; Gail S Ross; Dorothy Kleinert; Patricia Giardina
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02

9.  Psychological characteristics and subjective symptoms as determinants of psychological distress in patients prior to breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Noriko Ando; Yumi Iwamitsu; Masaru Kuranami; Shigemi Okazaki; Mei Wada; Kenji Yamamoto; Keiko Todoroki; Masahiko Watanabe; Hitoshi Miyaoka
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Levels of state and trait anxiety in patients referred to ophthalmology by primary care clinicians: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Christopher J Davey; Clare Harley; David B Elliott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.