Literature DB >> 21333777

The economic burden of incidentally detected findings.

Alexander Ding1, Jonathan D Eisenberg, Pari V Pandharipande.   

Abstract

Practitioners in all medical disciplines recognize the high frequency of incidentally detected findings. Although some findings are discovered on physical examination, an increasing majority are detected at imaging performed for another indication. With increasing federal scrutiny on the net value of imaging services, the costs and benefits of incidental findings need to be more rigorously quantified. In this article, the authors examine current related work on imaging expenditures for incidental findings and provide a framework for future investigations that will efficiently and substantially advance the knowledge in this field.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21333777      PMCID: PMC3094927          DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  39 in total

1.  The prevalence and implications of incidental findings on ED abdominal CT scans.

Authors:  W A Messersmith; D F Brown; M J Barry
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population.

Authors:  Thomas M Gluecker; C Daniel Johnson; Lynn A Wilson; Robert L Maccarty; Timothy J Welch; David J Vanness; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Assessing the impact of incidental findings in a lung cancer screening study by using low-dose computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael J Kucharczyk; Ravi J Menezes; Alexander McGregor; Narinder S Paul; Heidi C Roberts
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 2.248

6.  Cost-effectiveness of MR imaging and core-needle biopsy in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  J M Hrung; C P Langlotz; S G Orel; K R Fox; M D Schnall; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Clinical and economic impact of incidental thyroid lesions found with CT and MR.

Authors:  D M Youserm; T Huang; L A Loevner; C P Langlotz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  MR and conventional angiography: work in progress toward assessing utility in radiology.

Authors:  J S Swan; D G Fryback; W F Lawrence; D A Katz; D M Heisey; M E Hagenauer; P M Selzer; B K Jacobson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Process utility for imaging in cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  J Shannon Swan; François Sainfort; William F Lawrence; Vipat Kuruchittham; Thitima Kongnakorn; Dennis M Heisey
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning.

Authors:  R MacRedmond; P M Logan; M Lee; D Kenny; C Foley; R W Costello
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  27 in total

1.  Incidental findings in emergency imaging: frequency, recommendations, and compliance with consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Tarek N Hanna; Haris Shekhani; Matthew E Zygmont; James Matthew Kerchberger; Jamlik-Omari Johnson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03

2.  Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization.

Authors:  Ali Pourvaziri; Anushri Parakh; Amirkasra Mojtahed; Avinash Kambadakone; Dushyant Vasudeo Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparative performance of non-contrast MRI with HASTE vs. contrast-enhanced MRI/3D-MRCP for possible choledocholithiasis in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; Laura Heacock; Ankur M Doshi; Justin R Ream; Jeffrey Sun; James S Babb
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-06

4.  Considering Fabry, but Diagnosing MPS I: Difficulties in the Diagnostic Process.

Authors:  E J Langereis; I E T van den Berg; D J J Halley; B J H M Poorthuis; F M Vaz; J H J Wokke; G E Linthorst
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2012-10-30

5.  [Incidental findings : Evaluation, management recommendations and legal considerations].

Authors:  P Mildenberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Incidental findings in blunt trauma patients: prevalence, follow-up documentation, and risk factors.

Authors:  Melissa K James; Michael P Francois; Gideon Yoeli; Geoffrey K Doughlin; Shi-Wen Lee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-02-09

7.  A Randomized Study of Patient Risk Perception for Incidental Renal Findings on Diagnostic Imaging Tests.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; Laura D Scherer; Alec J Megibow; Leslie J Higuita; Nathanael Kim; R Scott Braithwaite; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Imaging-based screening: understanding the controversies.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Pari V Pandharipande; Janie M Lee; Constance D Lehman; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Evaluation of incidental pelvic fluid in relation to physiological changes in healthy pubescent children using pelvic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ashkan Tadayoni; Faraz Farhadi; S Mojdeh Mirmomen; Ahmad Shafiei; Karen F Berman; Mohammadhadi Bagheri; Pedro E Martinez; Peter J Schmidt; Jack A Yanovski; Ashkan A Malayeri
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-12

10.  Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Chin Hur; G Scott Gazelle; Deborah Schrag; Elizabeth G McFarland; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.