Literature DB >> 20944628

Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Lutz Becks1, Aneil F Agrawal.   

Abstract

The evolution and maintenance of sexual reproduction has puzzled biologists for decades. Although this field is rich in hypotheses, experimental evidence is scarce. Some important experiments have demonstrated differences in evolutionary rates between sexual and asexual populations; other experiments have documented evolutionary changes in phenomena related to genetic mixing, such as recombination and selfing. However, direct experiments of the evolution of sex within populations are extremely rare (but see ref. 12). Here we use the rotifer, Brachionus calyciflorus, which is capable of both sexual and asexual reproduction, to test recent theory predicting that there is more opportunity for sex to evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments. Replicated experimental populations of rotifers were maintained in homogeneous environments, composed of either high- or low-quality food habitats, or in heterogeneous environments that consisted of a mix of the two habitats. For populations maintained in either type of homogeneous environment, the rate of sex evolves rapidly towards zero. In contrast, higher rates of sex evolve in populations experiencing spatially heterogeneous environments. The data indicate that the higher level of sex observed under heterogeneity is not due to sex being less costly or selection against sex being less efficient; rather sex is sufficiently advantageous in heterogeneous environments to overwhelm its inherent costs. Counter to some alternative theories for the evolution of sex, there is no evidence that genetic drift plays any part in the evolution of sex in these populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20944628     DOI: 10.1038/nature09449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  25 in total

1.  Selection for recombination in small populations.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  T Lenormand; S P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sex releases the speed limit on evolution.

Authors:  Nick Colegrave
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations.

Authors:  Matthew R Goddard; H Charles J Godfray; Austin Burt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The evolutionary enigma of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Differences between selection on sex versus recombination in red queen models with diploid hosts.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Migration versus mutation in the evolution of recombination under multilocus selection.

Authors:  K V Pylkov; L A Zhivotovsky; M W Feldman
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 8.  Population genetic perspectives on the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  M W Feldman; S P Otto; F B Christiansen
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  33 in total

1.  Coalescent Times and Patterns of Genetic Diversity in Species with Facultative Sex: Effects of Gene Conversion, Population Structure, and Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Stephen I Wright; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Does the avoidance of sexual costs increase fitness in asexual invaders?

Authors:  Claus-Peter Stelzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Higher rates of sex evolve during adaptation to more complex environments.

Authors:  Pepijn Luijckx; Eddie Ka Ho Ho; Majid Gasim; Suyang Chen; Andrijana Stanic; Connor Yanchus; Yun Seong Kim; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A population of sexual Daphnia pulex resists invasion by asexual clones.

Authors:  David J Innes; Michael Ginn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Diapause and maintenance of facultative sexual reproductive strategies.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Stelzer; Jussi Lehtonen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  What does the geography of parthenogenesis teach us about sex?

Authors:  Anaïs Tilquin; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The ecology of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  C M Lively; L T Morran
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  The Evolution of Sex is Tempered by Costly Hybridization in Boechera (Rock Cress).

Authors:  Catherine A Rushworth; Tom Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Inventory and phylogenetic analysis of meiotic genes in monogonont rotifers.

Authors:  Sara J Hanson; Andrew M Schurko; Bette Hecox-Lea; David B Mark Welch; Claus-Peter Stelzer; John M Logsdon
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  The evolution of obligate sex: the roles of sexual selection and recombination.

Authors:  Maya Kleiman; Lilach Hadany
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.