Literature DB >> 28053226

Higher rates of sex evolve during adaptation to more complex environments.

Pepijn Luijckx1, Eddie Ka Ho Ho2, Majid Gasim2, Suyang Chen2, Andrijana Stanic2, Connor Yanchus2, Yun Seong Kim2, Aneil F Agrawal2.   

Abstract

A leading hypothesis for the evolutionary maintenance of sexual reproduction proposes that sex is advantageous because it facilitates adaptation. Changes in the environment stimulate adaptation but not all changes are equivalent; a change may occur along one or multiple environmental dimensions. In two evolution experiments with the facultatively sexual rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus, we test how environmental complexity affects the evolution of sex by adapting replicate populations to various environments that differ from the original along one, two, or three environmental dimensions. Three different estimates of fitness (growth, lifetime reproduction, and population density) confirmed that populations adapted to their new environment. Growth measures revealed an intriguing cost of complex adaptations: populations that adapted to more complex environments lost greater amounts of fitness in the original environment. Furthermore, both experiments showed that B. calyciflorus became more sexual when adapting to a greater number of environmental dimensions. Common garden experiments confirmed that observed changes in sex were heritable. As environments in nature are inherently complex these findings help explain why sex is maintained in natural populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fisher–Muller hypothesis; Hill–Robertson interference; adaptation; evolution of sex

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28053226      PMCID: PMC5255599          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1604072114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Adaptation and the cost of complexity.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Selection for recombination in small populations.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Sex releases the speed limit on evolution.

Authors:  Nick Colegrave
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Current hypotheses for the evolution of sex and recombination.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.654

5.  Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Lutz Becks; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations.

Authors:  Matthew R Goddard; H Charles J Godfray; Austin Burt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Host-parasite 'Red Queen' dynamics archived in pond sediment.

Authors:  Ellen Decaestecker; Sabrina Gaba; Joost A M Raeymaekers; Robby Stoks; Liesbeth Van Kerckhoven; Dieter Ebert; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The evolutionary enigma of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Gene swamping alters evolution during range expansions in the protist Tetrahymena thermophila.

Authors:  Felix Moerman; Emanuel A Fronhofer; Andreas Wagner; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Selection on growth rate and local adaptation drive genomic adaptation during experimental range expansions in the protist Tetrahymena thermophila.

Authors:  Felix Moerman; Emanuel A Fronhofer; Florian Altermatt; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Experimental Evolution with Caenorhabditis Nematodes.

Authors:  Henrique Teotónio; Suzanne Estes; Patrick C Phillips; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  What's Genetic Variation Got to Do with It? Starvation-Induced Self-Fertilization Enhances Survival in Paramecium.

Authors:  Amarinder Singh Thind; Valerio Vitali; Mario Rosario Guarracino; Francesco Catania
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Direct evidence of sex and a hypothesis about meiosis in Symbiodiniaceae.

Authors:  R I Figueroa; L I Howe-Kerr; A M S Correa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The advantage of sex: Reinserting fluctuating selection in the pluralist approach.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Pierre; Solenn Stoeckel; Eric Wajnberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Incomplete influenza A virus genomes occur frequently but are readily complemented during localized viral spread.

Authors:  Nathan T Jacobs; Nina O Onuoha; Alice Antia; John Steel; Rustom Antia; Anice C Lowen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Parthenogenesis in Darevskia lizards: A rare outcome of common hybridization, not a common outcome of rare hybridization.

Authors:  Susana Freitas; Anja Marie Westram; Tanja Schwander; Marine Arakelyan; Çetin Ilgaz; Yusuf Kumlutas; David James Harris; Miguel A Carretero; Roger K Butlin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.171

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.