Literature DB >> 13678373

Feature-sampling and random-walk models of individual-stimulus recognition.

Koen Lamberts1, Noellie Brockdorff, Evan Heit.   

Abstract

Traditional process models of old-new recognition have not addressed differences in accuracy and response time between individual stimuli. Two new process models of recognition are presented and applied to response time and accuracy data from 3 old-new recognition experiments. The 1st model is derived from a feature-sampling account of the time course of categorization, whereas the 2nd model is a generalization of a random-walk model of categorization. In the experiments, a new technique was used, which yielded reliable individual-stimulus data through repeated presentation of structurally equivalent items. The results from the experiments showed reliable differences in accuracy and response times between stimuli. The random-walk model provided the better account of the results from the 3 experiments. The implications of the results for process models of recognition are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13678373     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  13 in total

1.  Serial position effects in implicit memory for multiple-digit numbers.

Authors:  Ruth K Raanaas; Svein Magnussen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-09-03

2.  Exemplar similarity, study list homogeneity, and short-term perceptual recognition.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Justin Kantner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

3.  Characterizing sequence knowledge using online measures and hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Ingmar Visser; Maartje E J Raijmakers; Peter C M Molenaar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

4.  Recognition and position information in working memory for visual textures.

Authors:  Yuko Yotsumoto; Michael J Kahana; Chris McLaughlin; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

5.  Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little; Christopher Donkin; Mario Fific
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Recognizing distinctive faces: a hybrid-similarity exemplar model account.

Authors:  Bethany R Knapp; Robert M Nosofsky; Thomas A Busey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

7.  Homogeneity computation: how interitem similarity in visual short-term memory alters recognition.

Authors:  Shivakumar Viswanathan; Daniel R Perl; Kristina M Visscher; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  Trial-to-trial carryover in auditory short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Intracranial electroencephalography reveals two distinct similarity effects during item recognition.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Robert Sekuler; Brian Litt; Armin Brandt; Gordon Baltuch; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  An electrophysiological signature of summed similarity in visual working memory.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Robert Sekuler; Hugh R Wilson; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.