Literature DB >> 6725043

Dosimetric evaluation of a pencil-beam algorithm for electrons employing a two-dimensional heterogeneity correction.

K R Hogstrom, M D Mills, J A Meyer, J R Palta, D E Mellenberg, R T Meoz, R S Fields.   

Abstract

The accuracy of a pencil-beam algorithm for electrons employing a two-dimensional heterogeneity correction is demonstrated by comparing calculation with measurement. Ionization measurements have been made in a water phantom for a variety of non-standard geometries. Geometries to demonstrate the effect of an extended treatment distance, a sloping skin surface, and an irregular skin surface have been selected. Additionally, thermoluminescent dosimeters have been used to measure distributions in tissue-substitute phantoms, which were designed from individual patient computerized tomographic scans. Three patient scans have been selected: (1) diffuse hystiocytic lymphoma of the left buccal mucosa and retromolar trigone; (2) squamous cell carcinoma of the nose at the columnella ; and (3) carcinoma of the maxillary antrum. Results demonstrate the algorithm's ability to simultaneously account for the isodose shifting as a result of internal heterogeneities and for sidescatter non-equilibrium caused by lateral discontinuities of the skin surface and internal anatomy. The algorithm is shown to generally be accurate to within +/- 4% in the treatment volume or +/- 4 mm in regions of sharp dose gradients as found in the penumbra and distal edge of the beam. Examples of greater disagreement are shown and their physical interpretation discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6725043     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90036-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

1.  A computational tool for the efficient analysis of dose-volume histograms from radiation therapy treatment plans.

Authors:  Anil Pyakuryal; W Kenji Myint; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Sunyoung Jang; Jerilyn A Logemann; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Comparative study of convolution, superposition, and fast superposition algorithms in conventional radiotherapy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques for various sites, done on CMS XIO planning system.

Authors:  K R Muralidhar; Narayana P Murthy; Alluri Krishnam Raju; Nvnm Sresty
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-01

3.  Development and verification of an analytical algorithm to predict absorbed dose distributions in ocular proton therapy using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Nicholas C Koch; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Derivative based sensitivity analysis of gamma index.

Authors:  Biplab Sarkar; Anirudh Pradhan; T Ganesh
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

5.  AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations - Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams.

Authors:  Jennifer B Smilowitz; Indra J Das; Vladimir Feygelman; Benedick A Fraass; Stephen F Kry; Ingrid R Marshall; Dimitris N Mihailidis; Zoubir Ouhib; Timothy Ritter; Michael G Snyder; Lynne Fairobent
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Evaluation of the Eclipse eMC algorithm for bolus electron conformal therapy using a standard verification dataset.

Authors:  Robert L Carver; Conrad P Sprunger; Kenneth R Hogstrom; Richard A Popple; John A Antolak
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Incorporating biological modeling into patient-specific plan verification.

Authors:  Ara N Alexandrian; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Ganesh Narayanasamy; Kristen A McConnell; Christopher N Kabat; Renil B George; Dewayne L Defoor; Neil Kirby; Nikos Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  The Study of Field Equivalence Determined by the Modeled Percentage Depth Dose in Electron Beam Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  You-Guo Ma; Yan-Shan Zhang; Yan-Cheng Ye; Jia-Ming Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Calculating percent depth dose with the electron pencil-beam redefinition algorithm.

Authors:  Michael J Price; Kenneth R Hogstrom; John A Antolak; R Allen White; Charles D Bloch; Robert A Boyd
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Evaluation of MVCT images with skin collimation for electron beam treatment planning.

Authors:  Allen B Beardmore; Isaac I Rosen; Dennis A Cheek; Robert S Fields; Kenneth R Hogstrom
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.