PURPOSE: Salivary gland impairment following high activity radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is a severe side effect. Dosimetric calculations using planar gamma camera scintigraphy (GCS) with (131)I and ultrasonography (US) provided evidence that the average organ dose per administered (131)I activity (ODpA) is too low to account for observed radiation damages to the salivary glands. The objective of this work was to re-estimate the ODpA using (124)I PET(/CT) as a more reliable approach than (131)I GCS/US. METHODS: Ten DTC patients underwent a series of six (or seven) PET scans and one PET/CT scan after administration of approximately 23 MBq (124)I-iodide. Volumes of interest (VOIs) drawn on the CT and serial PET images were used to determine the glandular volumes and the imaged (124)I activities. To enable identical VOIs to be drawn on serial PET images, each PET was co-registered with the CT image. To correct for partial volume effect and for the artificial bias in the activity concentration due to cascading gamma coincidences occurring in (124)I decay, the imaged activity was effectively corrected using isovolume recovery coefficients (RCs) based on recovery phantom measurements. A head-neck phantom, which contained (124)I-filled spheres, was manufactured to validate the isovolume recovery correction method with a realistic patient-based phantom geometry and for a range of activity concentration regimes. The mean+/-standard deviation (range) ODpA projected for (131)I was calculated using the absorbed dose fraction method. RESULTS: The ODpAs (in Gy/GBq) for the submandibular and parotid glands were 0.32 +/- 0.13 (0.18-0.55) and 0.31 +/- 0.10 (0.13-0.46), respectively. No significant differences (p> 0.2) in the mean ODpA between (124)I PET(/CT) and (131)I GCS/US dosimetry was found. The validation experiment showed that the percentage deviations between RC-corrected and true activity concentrations were <10%. CONCLUSION: (124)I PET(/CT) dosimetry also corroborates the low ODpAs to the salivary glands. A voxel-based calculation taking into account the nonuniform activity distributions in the glands is necessary to possibly explain the radiation-induced salivary gland damage.
PURPOSE:Salivary gland impairment following high activity radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is a severe side effect. Dosimetric calculations using planar gamma camera scintigraphy (GCS) with (131)I and ultrasonography (US) provided evidence that the average organ dose per administered (131)I activity (ODpA) is too low to account for observed radiation damages to the salivary glands. The objective of this work was to re-estimate the ODpA using (124)I PET(/CT) as a more reliable approach than (131)I GCS/US. METHODS: Ten DTC patients underwent a series of six (or seven) PET scans and one PET/CT scan after administration of approximately 23 MBq (124)I-iodide. Volumes of interest (VOIs) drawn on the CT and serial PET images were used to determine the glandular volumes and the imaged (124)I activities. To enable identical VOIs to be drawn on serial PET images, each PET was co-registered with the CT image. To correct for partial volume effect and for the artificial bias in the activity concentration due to cascading gamma coincidences occurring in (124)I decay, the imaged activity was effectively corrected using isovolume recovery coefficients (RCs) based on recovery phantom measurements. A head-neck phantom, which contained (124)I-filled spheres, was manufactured to validate the isovolume recovery correction method with a realistic patient-based phantom geometry and for a range of activity concentration regimes. The mean+/-standard deviation (range) ODpA projected for (131)I was calculated using the absorbed dose fraction method. RESULTS: The ODpAs (in Gy/GBq) for the submandibular and parotid glands were 0.32 +/- 0.13 (0.18-0.55) and 0.31 +/- 0.10 (0.13-0.46), respectively. No significant differences (p> 0.2) in the mean ODpA between (124)I PET(/CT) and (131)I GCS/US dosimetry was found. The validation experiment showed that the percentage deviations between RC-corrected and true activity concentrations were <10%. CONCLUSION: (124)I PET(/CT) dosimetry also corroborates the low ODpAs to the salivary glands. A voxel-based calculation taking into account the nonuniform activity distributions in the glands is necessary to possibly explain the radiation-induced salivary gland damage.
Authors: K H Bohuslavizki; W Brenner; S Lassmann; S Tinnemeyer; G Tönshoff; C Sippel; H Wolf; M Clausen; E Henze Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Elke Schneider; Lutz Freudenberg; Ernst G Eising; Rainer Görges; Stefan P Müller; Wofgang Brandau; Andreas Bockisch Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: K H Bohuslavizki; W Brenner; S Lassmann; S Tinnemeyer; S Kalina; M Clausen; E Henze Journal: Nuklearmedizin Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 1.379
Authors: Robert F Hobbs; Richard L Wahl; Martin A Lodge; Mehrbod S Javadi; Steve Y Cho; David T Chien; Marge E Ewertz; Caroline E Esaias; Paul W Ladenson; George Sgouros Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: S M Jhiang; J Y Cho; K Y Ryu; B R DeYoung; P A Smanik; V R McGaughy; A H Fischer; E L Mazzaferri Journal: Endocrinology Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Lutz S Freudenberg; Walter Jentzen; Alexander Stahl; Andreas Bockisch; Sandra J Rosenbaum-Krumme Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Dorothee Balschuweit; Jochen Schmitz; Lutz Freudenberg; Ernst Eising; Thomas Hilbel; Andreas Bockisch; Alexander Stahl Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: George Sgouros; Robert F Hobbs; Francis B Atkins; Douglas Van Nostrand; Paul W Ladenson; Richard L Wahl Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Abigail E Besemer; Joseph J Grudzinski; Jamey P Weichert; Lance T Hall; Bryan P Bednarz Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Jim O'Doherty; Maite Jauregui-Osoro; Teresa Brothwood; Teresa Szyszko; Paul K Marsden; Michael J O'Doherty; Gary J R Cook; Philip J Blower; Val Lewington Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Sara St James; Bryan Bednarz; Stanley Benedict; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Yuni Dewaraja; Eric Frey; Robert Hobbs; Joseph Grudzinski; Emilie Roncali; George Sgouros; Jacek Capala; Ying Xiao Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Marion Richter; James Nagarajah; Thorsten Dirk Poeppel; Wolfgang Brandau; Colin Dawes; Andreas Bockisch; Ina Binse Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2014-12-06