AIM: Salivary gland toxicity is of concern in radioiodine treatment of thyroid cancer. Toxicity is often observed while the estimated radiation absorbed dose (AD) values are below expected toxicity thresholds. Monte Carlo-based voxelized 3-dimensional radiobiological dosimetry (3D-RD) calculations of the salivary glands from eight metastatic thyroid cancer patients treated with 131I are presented with the objective of resolving this discrepancy. METHODS: GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations were performed for 131I, based on pretherapeutic 124I PET/CT imaging corrected for partial volume effect, and the results scaled to the therapeutic administered activities. For patients with external regions of high uptake proximal to the salivary glands, such as thyroid remnants or lymph node metastases, separate simulations were run to quantify the AD contributions from both (A) the salivary glands themselves, and (B) the external proximal region of high uptake (present for five patients). The contribution from the whole body outside the field of view was also estimated using modeling. Voxelized and average ADs and biological effective doses (BEDs) were calculated. RESULTS: The estimated average therapeutic ADs were 2.26 Gy considering all contributions and 1.94 Gy from the self-dose component only. The average contribution from the external region of high uptake was 0.54 Gy. This difference was more pronounced for the submandibular glands (2.64 versus 2.10 Gy) compared to the parotid glands (1.88 Gy versus 1.78 Gy). The BED values were on average only 6.6 % higher than (2.41 Gy) the ADs. CONCLUSION: The external sources of activity contribute significantly to the salivary gland AD, however neither this contribution, nor the radiobiological effect quantified by the BED are in themselves sufficient to explain the clinically observed toxicity.
AIM: Salivary gland toxicity is of concern in radioiodine treatment of thyroid cancer. Toxicity is often observed while the estimated radiation absorbed dose (AD) values are below expected toxicity thresholds. Monte Carlo-based voxelized 3-dimensional radiobiological dosimetry (3D-RD) calculations of the salivary glands from eight metastatic thyroid cancerpatients treated with 131I are presented with the objective of resolving this discrepancy. METHODS: GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations were performed for 131I, based on pretherapeutic 124I PET/CT imaging corrected for partial volume effect, and the results scaled to the therapeutic administered activities. For patients with external regions of high uptake proximal to the salivary glands, such as thyroid remnants or lymph node metastases, separate simulations were run to quantify the AD contributions from both (A) the salivary glands themselves, and (B) the external proximal region of high uptake (present for five patients). The contribution from the whole body outside the field of view was also estimated using modeling. Voxelized and average ADs and biological effective doses (BEDs) were calculated. RESULTS: The estimated average therapeutic ADs were 2.26 Gy considering all contributions and 1.94 Gy from the self-dose component only. The average contribution from the external region of high uptake was 0.54 Gy. This difference was more pronounced for the submandibular glands (2.64 versus 2.10 Gy) compared to the parotid glands (1.88 Gy versus 1.78 Gy). The BED values were on average only 6.6 % higher than (2.41 Gy) the ADs. CONCLUSION: The external sources of activity contribute significantly to the salivary gland AD, however neither this contribution, nor the radiobiological effect quantified by the BED are in themselves sufficient to explain the clinically observed toxicity.
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Dorothee Balschuweit; Jochen Schmitz; Lutz Freudenberg; Ernst Eising; Thomas Hilbel; Andreas Bockisch; Alexander Stahl Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Elke Schneider; Lutz Freudenberg; Ernst G Eising; Rainer Görges; Stefan P Müller; Wofgang Brandau; Andreas Bockisch Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Robert F Hobbs; Sébastien Baechler; Richard L Wahl; Bin He; Hong Song; Caroline E Esaias; Eric C Frey; Heather Jacene; George Sgouros Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Robert F Hobbs; Richard L Wahl; Martin A Lodge; Mehrbod S Javadi; Steve Y Cho; David T Chien; Marge E Ewertz; Caroline E Esaias; Paul W Ladenson; George Sgouros Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Robert F Hobbs; Alexander Stahl; Jochen Knust; George Sgouros; Andreas Bockisch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Donika Plyku; Robert F Hobbs; Di Wu; Carlos Garcia; George Sgouros; Douglas Van Nostrand Journal: Ann Nucl Med Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Marion Richter; James Nagarajah; Thorsten Dirk Poeppel; Wolfgang Brandau; Colin Dawes; Andreas Bockisch; Ina Binse Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2014-12-06
Authors: Peter Kletting; Christiane Schuchardt; Harshad R Kulkarni; Mostafa Shahinfar; Aviral Singh; Gerhard Glatting; Richard P Baum; Ambros J Beer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 3.240