Literature DB >> 16696370

The impact of PET and SPECT on dosimetry for targeted radionuclide therapy.

Glenn Flux1, Manuel Bardies, Myriam Monsieurs, Sauli Savolainen, Sven-Erik Strands, Michael Lassmann.   

Abstract

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is an increasingly used treatment modality for a range of cancers. To date, few treatments have involved the use of dosimetry either to plan treatment or to retrospectively ascertain the absorbed dose delivered during treatment. Also the correlation between absorbed dose and biological effect has been difficult to establish. Tomographic methods permit the determination of the activity volume on a macroscopic scale at different time points. Proper attenuation correction in tomographic imaging requires a patient-specific attenuation map. This can be obtained from scintillation-camera transmission scanning, CT or by using segmented scatter-emission images. Attenuation corrections can be performed either on the projection images, on the reconstructed images, or as part of an iterative reconstruction method. The problem of image quantification for therapy radionuclides, particularly for I-131, is exacerbated by the fact that most cameras are optimised for diagnostic imaging with Tc-99m. In addition, problems may arise when high activities are to be measured due to count losses and mis-positioned events, because of insufficient pile-up and dead time correction methods. Sufficient image quantification, however is only possible if all effects that degrade the quantitative content of the image have been corrected for. Monte Carlo simulations are an appealing tool that can help to model interactions occurring in the patient or in the detector system. This is helpful to develop and test correction techniques, or to help to define detectors better suited to quantitative imaging. PET is probably the most accurate imaging method for the determination of activity concentrations in tissue. PET imaging can be considered for pre-therapeutic treatment planning but ideally requires the use of a radioisotope from the same element as that used for treatment (e.g. I-124 for I-131; Y-86 for Y-90). Problems, however are that--some of the positron emitting isotopes have a shorter half-life--non-standard quantification procedures have to be performed--the availability of the radiopharmaceutical is presently limited; Many 3D-tools and -techniques are now available to the physicist and clinician to enable absorbed dose calculations to both target and critical organs-at-risk. The challenge now facing nuclear medicine is to enable this methodology to be routinely available to the clinic, to ensure common standard operating procedures between centres and in particular to correlate response criteria with absorbed dose estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16696370     DOI: 10.1078/0939-3889-00291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Med Phys        ISSN: 0939-3889            Impact factor:   4.820


  28 in total

1.  Feasibility of 90Y TOF PET-based dosimetry in liver metastasis therapy using SIR-Spheres.

Authors:  Renaud Lhommel; Larry van Elmbt; Pierre Goffette; Marc Van den Eynde; François Jamar; Stanislas Pauwels; Stephan Walrand
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  MIRD pamphlet No. 23: quantitative SPECT for patient-specific 3-dimensional dosimetry in internal radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Yuni K Dewaraja; Eric C Frey; George Sgouros; A Bertrand Brill; Peter Roberson; Pat B Zanzonico; Michael Ljungberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Matched pairs dosimetry: 124I/131I metaiodobenzylguanidine and 124I/131I and 86Y/90Y antibodies.

Authors:  Egesta Lopci; Arturo Chiti; Maria Rita Castellani; Giovanna Pepe; Lidija Antunovic; Stefano Fanti; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Absolute quantification in SPECT.

Authors:  Philipp Ritt; Hans Vija; Joachim Hornegger; Torsten Kuwert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  A no-gold-standard technique for objective assessment of quantitative nuclear-medicine imaging methods.

Authors:  Abhinav K Jha; Brian Caffo; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Experimental facts supporting a red marrow uptake due to radiometal transchelation in 90Y-DOTATOC therapy and relationship to the decrease of platelet counts.

Authors:  Stephan Walrand; Raffaella Barone; Stanislas Pauwels; François Jamar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Therapeutic radionuclides in nuclear medicine: current and future prospects.

Authors:  Chai-Hong Yeong; Mu-hua Cheng; Kwan-Hoong Ng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.066

8.  In vivo tumor grading of prostate cancer using quantitative 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Youngho Seo; Carina Mari Aparici; Matthew R Cooperberg; Badrinath R Konety; Randall A Hawkins
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Pretreatment CLR 124 Positron Emission Tomography Accurately Predicts CLR 131 Three-Dimensional Dosimetry in a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patient.

Authors:  Abigail E Besemer; Joseph J Grudzinski; Jamey P Weichert; Lance T Hall; Bryan P Bednarz
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.099

10.  Study of the impact of tissue density heterogeneities on 3-dimensional abdominal dosimetry: comparison between dose kernel convolution and direct Monte Carlo methods.

Authors:  Arnaud Dieudonné; Robert F Hobbs; Rachida Lebtahi; Fabien Maurel; Sébastien Baechler; Richard L Wahl; Ariane Boubaker; Dominique Le Guludec; Georges Sgouros; Isabelle Gardin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.