Literature DB >> 20065219

Endothelial cell density to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty.

Jonathan H Lass1, Alan Sugar, Beth Ann Benetz, Roy W Beck, Mariya Dontchev, Robin L Gal, Craig Kollman, Robert Gross, Ellen Heck, Edward J Holland, Mark J Mannis, Irving Raber, Walter Stark, R Doyle Stulting.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preoperative and/or postoperative central endothelial cell density (ECD) and its rate of decline postoperatively are predictive of graft failure caused by endothelial decompensation following penetrating keratoplasty to treat a moderate-risk condition, principally, Fuchs dystrophy or pseudophakic corneal edema.
METHODS: In a subset of Cornea Donor Study participants, a central reading center determined preoperative and postoperative ECD from available specular images for 17 grafts that failed because of endothelial decompensation and 483 grafts that did not fail.
RESULTS: Preoperative ECD was not predictive of graft failure caused by endothelial decompensation (P = .91). However, the 6-month ECD was predictive of subsequent failure (P < .001). Among those that had not failed within the first 6 months, the 5-year cumulative incidence (+/-95% confidence interval) of failure was 13% (+/-12%) for the 33 participants with a 6-month ECD of less than 1700 cells/mm(2) vs 2% (+/-3%) for the 137 participants with a 6-month ECD of 2500 cells/mm(2) or higher. After 5 years' follow-up, 40 of 277 participants (14%) with a clear graft had an ECD below 500 cells/mm(2).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ECD is unrelated to graft failure from endothelial decompensation, whereas there is a strong correlation of ECD at 6 months with graft failure from endothelial decompensation. A graft can remain clear after 5 years even when the ECD is below 500 cells/mm(2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20065219      PMCID: PMC2950322          DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.128.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  25 in total

1.  Factors influencing the decline in endothelial cell density after corneal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Ilse Claerhout; Hilde Beele; Dirk De Bacquer; Philippe Kestelyn
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Predicting endothelial cell loss and long-term corneal graft survival.

Authors:  W John Armitage; Andrew D Dick; William M Bourne
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The effect of allograft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty on central endothelial cell density.

Authors:  D C Musch; A E Schwartz; K Fitzgerald-Shelton; A Sugar; R F Meyer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Corneal endothelial photography. American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Long-term changes in corneal endothelium following penetrating keratoplasty. A specular microscopic study.

Authors:  R L Abbott; M Fine; E Guillet
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  Clinical investigations on the corneal endothelium-XXXVIII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  S Mishima
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Neda Shamie; Edwin S Chen; Paul M Phillips; Karen L Hoar; Daniel J Friend
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Long-term changes in corneal endothelium after keratoplasty. A follow-up study.

Authors:  C M Zacks; R L Abbott; M Fine
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Corneal endothelial cell changes twenty years after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kenji Inoue; Chikako Kimura; Shiro Amano; Tetsuro Oshika; Tadahiko Tsuru
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.447

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Graft survival and endothelial outcomes in the new era of endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal endothelium: comparison of three morphometry methods after corneal transplantation.

Authors:  S Jonuscheit; M J Doughty; K Ramaesh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Beth Ann Benetz; Sanjay V Patel; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Robert O'Brien; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Yassine J Daoud; Mark A Greiner; Sadeer B Hannush; W Barry Lee; Thomas F Mauger; Harry J Menegay; Mark D Mifflin; Michael B Raizman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Robert L Schultze; Gregory A Schmidt; Alan Sugar; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of deep learning automatic segmentations of corneal endothelial cell images of reduced image quality obtained following cornea transplant.

Authors:  Naomi Joseph; Chaitanya Kolluru; Beth A M Benetz; Harry J Menegay; Jonathan H Lass; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-14

5.  Baseline factors related to endothelial cell loss following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Roy W Beck; Beth Ann Benetz; Mariya Dontchev; Robin L Gal; Edward J Holland; Craig Kollman; Mark J Mannis; Francis Price; Irving Raber; Walter Stark; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-09

6.  A mathematical model to predict endothelial cell density following penetrating keratoplasty with selective dropout from graft failure.

Authors:  Tonya D Riddlesworth; Craig Kollman; Jonathan H Lass; Sanjay V Patel; R Doyle Stulting; Beth Ann Benetz; Robin L Gal; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Proliferative capacity of corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Nancy C Joyce
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Endothelial morphometric measures to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Beth Ann Benetz; Jonathan H Lass; Robin L Gal; Alan Sugar; Harry Menegay; Mariya Dontchev; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck; Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland; Mark Gorovoy; Sadeer B Hannush; John E Bokosky; James W Caudill
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  Long-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus: analysis of the factors associated with final visual acuities.

Authors:  Jin A Choi; Min A Lee; Man-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Corneal thickness as a predictor of corneal transplant outcome.

Authors:  David D Verdier; Alan Sugar; Keith Baratz; Roy Beck; Mariya Dontchev; Steven Dunn; Robin L Gal; Edward J Holland; Craig Kollman; Jonathan H Lass; Mark J Mannis; Jeffrey Penta
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.