Literature DB >> 25425307

A mathematical model to predict endothelial cell density following penetrating keratoplasty with selective dropout from graft failure.

Tonya D Riddlesworth1, Craig Kollman1, Jonathan H Lass2, Sanjay V Patel3, R Doyle Stulting4, Beth Ann Benetz2, Robin L Gal1, Roy W Beck1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We constructed several mathematical models that predict endothelial cell density (ECD) for patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for a moderate-risk condition (principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema).
METHODS: In a subset (n = 591) of Cornea Donor Study participants, postoperative ECD was determined by a central reading center. Various statistical models were considered to estimate the ECD trend longitudinally over 10 years of follow-up. A biexponential model with and without a logarithm transformation was fit using the Gauss-Newton nonlinear least squares algorithm. To account for correlated data, a log-polynomial model was fit using the restricted maximum likelihood method. A sensitivity analysis for the potential bias due to selective dropout was performed using Bayesian analysis techniques.
RESULTS: The three models using a logarithm transformation yield similar trends, whereas the model without the transform predicts higher ECD values. The adjustment for selective dropout turns out to be negligible. However, this is possibly due to the relatively low rate of graft failure in this cohort (19% at 10 years). Fuchs' dystrophy and pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema (PACE) patients had similar ECD decay curves, with the PACE group having slightly higher cell densities by 10 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial cell loss after PK can be modeled via a log-polynomial model, which accounts for the correlated data from repeated measures on the same subject. This model is not significantly affected by the selective dropout due to graft failure. Our findings warrant further study on how this may extend to ECD following endothelial keratoplasty. © ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endothelial cell density; mathematical model; penetrating keratoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25425307      PMCID: PMC4541487          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  30 in total

1.  Clinical profile and early surgical complications in the Cornea Donor Study.

Authors:  Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland; Roy W Beck; Michael W Belin; Marc A Goldberg; Robin L Gal; Andrea D Kalajian; Kenneth R Kenyon; Craig Kollman; Katrina J Ruedy; Patricia Smith; Joel Sugar; Walter J Stark
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Selection models for repeated measurements with non-random dropout: an illustration of sensitivity.

Authors:  M G Kenward
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Predictive factors for endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  D C Musch; R F Meyer; A Sugar
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-01

Review 4.  Clinical investigations on the corneal endothelium-XXXVIII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  S Mishima
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel; David O Hodge; William M Bourne
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Baseline donor characteristics in the Cornea Donor Study.

Authors:  Alan Sugar; Robin L Gal; roy W Beck; Katrina J Ruedy; Christopher L Blanton; Robert S Feder; David R Hardten; Edward J Holland; Jonathan H Lass; Mark J Mannis; Michael B O'Keefe
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel; David O Hodge; William M Bourne
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

8.  Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  J J Ing; H H Ing; L R Nelson; D O Hodge; W M Bourne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Long-term survival of endothelium following transplantation of corneas stored by organ culture.

Authors:  R M Redmond; W J Armitage; J Whittle; S J Moss; D L Easty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Design and methods of The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  3 in total

1.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: surgical outcomes and endothelial cell count modelling from a UK centre.

Authors:  Mark A P Fajgenbaum; Nick Kopsachilis; Emma J Hollick
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Beth Ann Benetz; Sanjay V Patel; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Robert O'Brien; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Yassine J Daoud; Mark A Greiner; Sadeer B Hannush; W Barry Lee; Thomas F Mauger; Harry J Menegay; Mark D Mifflin; Michael B Raizman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Robert L Schultze; Gregory A Schmidt; Alan Sugar; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Long-Term Graft Survival and Decline in Endothelial Cell Density Following Penetrating Keratoplasty with Organ-Cultured Corneas.

Authors:  Ali E Ghareeb; Maria S Figueiredo; Sayali P Pradhan; Elinor Curnow; W John Armitage; Francisco C Figueiredo
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-03-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.