Literature DB >> 32090135

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of deep learning automatic segmentations of corneal endothelial cell images of reduced image quality obtained following cornea transplant.

Naomi Joseph1, Chaitanya Kolluru1, Beth A M Benetz2,3, Harry J Menegay2,3, Jonathan H Lass2,3, David L Wilson1,4.   

Abstract

We are developing automated analysis of corneal-endothelial-cell-layer, specular microscopic images so as to determine quantitative biomarkers indicative of corneal health following corneal transplantation. Especially on these images of varying quality, commercial automated image analysis systems can give inaccurate results, and manual methods are very labor intensive. We have developed a method to automatically segment endothelial cells with a process that included image flattening, U-Net deep learning, and postprocessing to create individual cell segmentations. We used 130 corneal endothelial cell images following one type of corneal transplantation (Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty) with expert-reader annotated cell borders. We obtained very good pixelwise segmentation performance (e.g., Dice coefficient = 0.87 ± 0.17 , Jaccard index = 0.80 ± 0.18 , across 10 folds). The automated method segmented cells left unmarked by analysts and sometimes segmented cells differently than analysts (e.g., one cell was split or two cells were merged). A clinically informative visual analysis of the held-out test set showed that 92% of cells within manually labeled regions were acceptably segmented and that, as compared to manual segmentation, automation added 21% more correctly segmented cells. We speculate that automation could reduce 15 to 30 min of manual segmentation to 3 to 5 min of manual review and editing.
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cornea; deep learning; endothelial cell segmentation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32090135      PMCID: PMC7019185          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.1.014503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  20 in total

Review 1.  Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions.

Authors:  Bernard E McCarey; Henry F Edelhauser; Michael J Lynn
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Influence of applied corneal endothelium image segmentation techniques on the clinical parameters.

Authors:  Adam Piorkowski; Karolina Nurzynska; Jolanta Gronkowska-Serafin; Bettina Selig; Cezary Boldak; Daniel Reska
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Segmentation of corneal endothelium images using a U-Net-based convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Anna Fabijańska
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Postoperative Endothelial Cell Density Is Associated with Late Endothelial Graft Failure after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel; Jonathan H Lass; Beth Ann Benetz; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Nathan J Cohen; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Donna C Drury; Steven P Dunn; Bennie H Jeng; Marc F Jones; Harry J Menegay; Matthew S Oliva; George O D Rosenwasser; John A Seedor; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Factors associated with corneal graft survival in the cornea donor study.

Authors:  Alan Sugar; Robin L Gal; Craig Kollman; Dan Raghinaru; Mariya Dontchev; Christopher R Croasdale; Robert S Feder; Edward J Holland; Jonathan H Lass; Jonathan I Macy; Mark J Mannis; Patricia W Smith; Sarkis H Soukiasian; Roy W Beck
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  Endothelial morphometric measures to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Beth Ann Benetz; Jonathan H Lass; Robin L Gal; Alan Sugar; Harry Menegay; Mariya Dontchev; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck; Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland; Mark Gorovoy; Sadeer B Hannush; John E Bokosky; James W Caudill
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful corneal transplantation. Specular microscopy ancillary study results.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Robin L Gal; Mariya Dontchev; Roy W Beck; Craig Kollman; Steven P Dunn; Ellen Heck; Edward J Holland; Mark J Mannis; Monty M Montoya; Robert L Schultze; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Joel Sugar; Bradley Tennant; David D Verdier
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Donor age and factors related to endothelial cell loss 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty: Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Beth Ann Benetz; Robin L Gal; Craig Kollman; Dan Raghinaru; Mariya Dontchev; Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland; Christopher Chow; Kristen McCoy; Francis W Price; Alan Sugar; David D Verdier; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Fully automatic evaluation of the corneal endothelium from in vivo confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Bettina Selig; Koenraad A Vermeer; Bernd Rieger; Toine Hillenaar; Cris L Luengo Hendriks
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Automated segmentation of the corneal endothelium in a large set of 'real-world' specular microscopy images using the U-Net architecture.

Authors:  Moritz C Daniel; Lisa Atzrodt; Felicitas Bucher; Katrin Wacker; Stefan Böhringer; Thomas Reinhard; Daniel Böhringer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biomedical Microscopic Imaging in Computational Intelligence Using Deep Learning Ensemble Convolution Learning-Based Feature Extraction and Classification.

Authors:  Tammineedi Venkata Satya Vivek; Ayesha Naureen; Mohd Shaikhul Ashraf; Sanhita Manna; Ahmed Mateen Buttar; P Muneeshwari; Mohd Wazih Ahmad
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Automated Image Segmentation of the Corneal Endothelium in Patients With Fuchs Dystrophy.

Authors:  Palanahalli S Shilpashree; Kaggere V Suresh; Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir; Sangly P Srinivas
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Overestimation of corneal endothelial cell density by automated method in glaucomatous eyes with impaired corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Mayumi Minami; Etsuo Chihara
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  DenseUNets with feedback non-local attention for the segmentation of specular microscopy images of the corneal endothelium with guttae.

Authors:  Juan P Vigueras-Guillén; Jeroen van Rooij; Bart T H van Dooren; Hans G Lemij; Esma Islamaj; Lucas J van Vliet; Koenraad A Vermeer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.