Literature DB >> 23343949

Corneal thickness as a predictor of corneal transplant outcome.

David D Verdier1, Alan Sugar, Keith Baratz, Roy Beck, Mariya Dontchev, Steven Dunn, Robin L Gal, Edward J Holland, Craig Kollman, Jonathan H Lass, Mark J Mannis, Jeffrey Penta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess corneal thickness (CT) and correlation with graft outcome after penetrating keratoplasty in the Cornea Donor Study.
METHODS: A total of 887 subjects with a corneal transplant for a moderate-risk condition (principally Fuchs dystrophy or pseudophakic corneal edema) had postoperative CT measurements throughout a 5-year follow-up time. Relationships between baseline (recipient, donor, and operative) factors and CT were explored. Proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between CT and graft failure. Relationship between CT and cell density was assessed with a longitudinal repeated measures model and Spearman correlation estimates.
RESULTS: Higher longitudinal CT measurements were associated with the following: diagnosis of pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (P < 0.001), intraocular pressure >25 mm Hg during the first postoperative month (P = 0.003), white (non-Hispanic) donor race (P = 0.002), and respiratory causes of donor death (P < 0.001). Among those without graft failure within the first postoperative year, the 5-year cumulative incidence (± 95% confidence interval) of graft failure was 5% ± 5% in those with a 1-year CT ≤ 500 μm, 5% ± 3% for CT 501 to 550 μm, 7% ± 4% for CT 551 to 600 μm, and 20% ± 11% for CT >600 μm. In a multivariate analysis, both 1-year CT and cell density were associated with subsequent graft failure (P = 0.002 and 0.009). CT increase was modestly associated with endothelial cell loss during follow-up (r = -0.29).
CONCLUSIONS: During the first 5 years after penetrating keratoplasty, CT can serve as a predictor of graft survival. However, CT is not a substitute for cell density measurement because both measures were independently predictive of graft failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23343949      PMCID: PMC3840498          DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31827b14c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  24 in total

1.  Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness.

Authors:  N Ehlers; T Bramsen; S Sperling
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1975-03

Review 2.  Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  M J Doughty; M L Zaman
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  One-year observation of transplanted human corneal endothelium.

Authors:  W M Bourne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Comparison of corneal storage in K-Sol and chondroitin sulfate corneal storage medium in human corneal transplantation.

Authors:  J H Lass; W J Reinhart; W E Bruner; M L Kachmer; M D Lomeo; K M Morgan; I Glavan; D R Sanders
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations.

Authors:  F A La Rosa; R L Gross; S Orengo-Nania
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01

6.  Central corneal thickness of Caucasians, Chinese, Hispanics, Filipinos, African Americans, and Japanese in a glaucoma clinic.

Authors:  Elsa Aghaian; Joyce E Choe; Shan Lin; Robert L Stamper
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).

Authors:  J D Brandt; J A Beiser; M A Kass; M O Gordon
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans.

Authors:  Mitsugu Shimmyo; Anna J Ross; Anna Moy; Ramin Mostafavi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Corneal thickness changes after high-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Study Group.

Authors:  P J McDonnell; C Enger; W J Stark; R D Stulting
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-10

10.  Epidermal growth factor and insulin use in corneal preservation. Results of a multi-center trial. The Corneal Preservation Study Group.

Authors:  J H Lass; D C Musch; J F Gordon; R A Laing
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  9 in total

1.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sonja Heinzelmann; Daniel Böhringer; Philipp Eberwein; Thabo Lapp; Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  In Vivo Characteristics of Corneal Endothelium/Descemet Membrane Complex for the Diagnosis of Corneal Graft Rejection.

Authors:  Mohamed Abou Shousha; Sonia H Yoo; Mohamed S Sayed; Sean Edelstein; Matthew Council; Ravi S Shah; Joshua Abernathy; Zachary Schmitz; Patrick Stuart; Rocio Bentivegna; Maria P Fernandez; Christopher Smith; Xiaotang Yin; George J Harocopos; Sander R Dubovy; William J Feuer; Jianhua Wang; Victor L Perez
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Factors associated with corneal graft survival in the cornea donor study.

Authors:  Alan Sugar; Robin L Gal; Craig Kollman; Dan Raghinaru; Mariya Dontchev; Christopher R Croasdale; Robert S Feder; Edward J Holland; Jonathan H Lass; Jonathan I Macy; Mark J Mannis; Patricia W Smith; Sarkis H Soukiasian; Roy W Beck
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients with a History of Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jun Hui Lee; Vivian Vu; Gabriel Lazcano-Gomez; Katherine Han; Pukkapol Suvannachart; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Julie Schallhorn; David Hwang; Ying Han
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Cyclosporine a drug-delivery system for high-risk penetrating keratoplasty: Stabilizing the intraocular immune microenvironment.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Zhiyuan Li; Ting Liu; Suxia Li; Hua Gao; Chao Wei; Weiyun Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness with endothelial cell density for the diagnosis of corneal transplant rejection.

Authors:  Christopher Smith; Daniel Kaitis; Jordan Winegar; Sean Edelstein; Matthew Council; George Kontadakis; Rocio Bentivegna; Mohamed Abou Shousha
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-03

7.  Prediction of corneal graft rejection using central endothelium/Descemet's membrane complex thickness in high-risk corneal transplants.

Authors:  Taher Eleiwa; Amr Elsawy; Eyup Ozcan; Collin Chase; William Feuer; Sonia H Yoo; Victor L Perez; Mohamed F Abou Shousha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Variable Responses to Corneal Grafts: Insights from Immunology and Systems Biology.

Authors:  Antonio Di Zazzo; Sang-Mok Lee; Jaemyoung Sung; Matteo Niutta; Marco Coassin; Alireza Mashaghi; Takenori Inomata
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Comparison of corneal thickness in patients with dry eye disease using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujimoto; Takenori Inomata; Yuichi Okumura; Nanami Iwata; Kenta Fujio; Atsuko Eguchi; Ken Nagino; Hurramhon Shokirova; Maria Karasawa; Akira Murakami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.