Literature DB >> 23493999

Endothelial morphometric measures to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty.

Beth Ann Benetz1, Jonathan H Lass1, Robin L Gal2, Alan Sugar3, Harry Menegay1, Mariya Dontchev2, Craig Kollman2, Roy W Beck2, Mark J Mannis4, Edward J Holland5, Mark Gorovoy6, Sadeer B Hannush7, John E Bokosky8, James W Caudill9.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Endothelial morphometric measures have potential value in predicting graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preoperative and/or postoperative central morphometric measures (endothelial cell density [ECD], coefficient of variation [CV], and percentage of hexagonality [HEX]) and their postoperative changes are predictive of graft failure caused by endothelial decompensation after penetrating keratoplasty to treat a moderate-risk condition, principally Fuchs dystrophy or pseudophakic corneal edema.
DESIGN: In a subset of Cornea Donor Study participants with graft failure, a central reading center determined preoperative and postoperative ECD, CV, and HEX from available central endothelial specular images.
SETTING: Cornea Image Analysis Reading Center of the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen patients with graft failure due to endothelial decompensation and 54 individuals matched for most donor and recipient measures at baseline whose grafts did not fail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in ECD, CV, and HEX values.
RESULTS: Preoperative ECD was not associated with graft failure (P = .43); however, a lower ECD at 6 months was predictive of subsequent failure (P = .004). Coefficient of variation at 6 months was not associated with graft failure in univariate (P = .91) or multivariate (P = .79) analyses. We found a suggestive trend of higher graft failure with lower HEX values at 6 months (P = .02) but not at the established statistical significance (P < .01). The most recent CV or HEX values, as time-dependent variables, were not associated with graft failure (P = .26 and P = .81, respectively). Endothelial cell density values decreased during follow-up, whereas CV and HEX appear to fluctuate without an apparent trend. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Endothelial cell density at 6 months after penetrating keratoplasty is predictive of graft failure, whereas CV and HEX appear to fluctuate postoperatively, possibly indicating an unstable endothelial population in clear and failing grafts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00006411.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23493999      PMCID: PMC4179110          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  32 in total

Review 1.  Clinical responses of the corneal endothelium.

Authors:  William M Bourne; Jay W McLaren
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre-dot method is used?

Authors:  Michael J Doughty
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Response of the corneal endothelium to cataract surgery.

Authors:  R O Schultz; D B Glasser; M Matsuda; R W Yee; H F Edelhauser
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-08

4.  Assessment of the reliability of calculations of the coefficient of variation for normal and polymegethous human corneal endothelium.

Authors:  M J Doughty; D Fonn; K Trang Nguyen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Geometrical models for cells in tissues.

Authors:  H Honda
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1983

6.  The functional reserve of corneal endothelium.

Authors:  E L Shaw; G N Rao; E J Arthur; J V Aquavella
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Endothelial cell morphology and corneal deturgescence.

Authors:  G N Rao; E L Shaw; E J Arthur; J V Aquavella
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-06

8.  Comparison of corneal storage in K-Sol and chondroitin sulfate corneal storage medium in human corneal transplantation.

Authors:  J H Lass; W J Reinhart; W E Bruner; M L Kachmer; M D Lomeo; K M Morgan; I Glavan; D R Sanders
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  An in vitro and clinical comparison of corneal storage with chondroitin sulfate corneal storage medium with and without dextran.

Authors:  J H Lass; W J Reinhart; D L Skelnik; W E Bruner; R P Shockley; J Y Park; D L Hom; R L Lindstrom
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Corneal endothelial changes in type I and type II diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  R O Schultz; M Matsuda; R W Yee; H F Edelhauser; K J Schultz
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-10-15       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  8 in total

1.  Corneal endothelial cell analysis using two non-contact specular microscopes in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Manuel Garza-Leon
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes.

Authors:  Irmak Karaca; Suzan Guven Yilmaz; Melis Palamar; Halil Ates
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of deep learning automatic segmentations of corneal endothelial cell images of reduced image quality obtained following cornea transplant.

Authors:  Naomi Joseph; Chaitanya Kolluru; Beth A M Benetz; Harry J Menegay; Jonathan H Lass; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-14

4.  In Vivo Characteristics of Corneal Endothelium/Descemet Membrane Complex for the Diagnosis of Corneal Graft Rejection.

Authors:  Mohamed Abou Shousha; Sonia H Yoo; Mohamed S Sayed; Sean Edelstein; Matthew Council; Ravi S Shah; Joshua Abernathy; Zachary Schmitz; Patrick Stuart; Rocio Bentivegna; Maria P Fernandez; Christopher Smith; Xiaotang Yin; George J Harocopos; Sander R Dubovy; William J Feuer; Jianhua Wang; Victor L Perez
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Effect of Donor Graft Quality on Clinical Outcomes After Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Hassan Ghasemi; Fatemeh Javadi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 6.  Risk Factors for Endothelial Decompensation after Penetrating Keratoplasty and Its Novel Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Mengyuan Liu; Jing Hong
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Five-year endothelial cell count post penetrating keratoplasty using internationally-transported corneal donor tissue.

Authors:  Ashbala Khattak; Fouad anNakhli
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-22

Review 8.  Variable Responses to Corneal Grafts: Insights from Immunology and Systems Biology.

Authors:  Antonio Di Zazzo; Sang-Mok Lee; Jaemyoung Sung; Matteo Niutta; Marco Coassin; Alireza Mashaghi; Takenori Inomata
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.