Literature DB >> 20055538

A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing.

Marco Boi1, Haluk Oğmen, Joseph Krummenacher, Thomas U Otto, Michael H Herzog.   

Abstract

In human vision, the optics of the eye map neighboring points of the environment onto neighboring photoreceptors in the retina. This retinotopic encoding principle is preserved in the early visual areas. Under normal viewing conditions, due to the motion of objects and to eye movements, the retinotopic representation of the environment undergoes fast and drastic shifts. Yet, perceptually our environment appears stable suggesting the existence of non-retinotopic representations in addition to the well-known retinotopic ones. Here, we present a simple psychophysical test to determine whether a given visual process is accomplished in retino- or non-retinotopic coordinates. As examples, we show that visual search and motion perception can occur within a non-retinotopic frame of reference. These findings suggest that more mechanisms than previously thought operate non-retinotopically. Whether this is true for a given visual process can easily be found out with our "litmus test."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20055538      PMCID: PMC2904816          DOI: 10.1167/9.13.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  36 in total

1.  The maintenance of apparent luminance of an object.

Authors:  S S Shimozaki; M Eckstein; J P Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Comparing local and remote motion aftereffects.

Authors:  M von Grünau; S Dubé
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1992

3.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The flight path of the phoenix--the visible trace of invisible elements in human vision.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Oğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Assessing the microstructure of motion correspondences with non-retinotopic feature attribution.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Oğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT.

Authors:  Giovanni d'Avossa; Michela Tosetti; Sofia Crespi; Laura Biagi; David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Phantom motion after effects--evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow.

Authors:  R J Snowden; A B Milne
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Mobile computation: spatiotemporal integration of the properties of objects in motion.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Alex O Holcombe; Weilun Chou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  23 in total

1.  Reevaluating excess success in psychological science.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Christof Koch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Nonretinotopic exogenous attention.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Mark Vergeer; Haluk Ogmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Does spatio-temporal filtering account for nonretinotopic motion perception? Comment on Pooresmaeili, Cicchini, Morrone, and Burr (2012).

Authors:  Aaron M Clarke; Marc Repnow; Haluk Öğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Attention and non-retinotopic feature integration.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Öğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Automatic frame-centered object representation and integration revealed by iconic memory, visual priming, and backward masking.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Confirming the appearance of excess success: Reply to van Boxtel and Koch (2016).

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

7.  Barrier effects in non-retinotopic feature attribution.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Attention modulates spatio-temporal grouping.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  High-capacity, transient retention of direction-of-motion information for multiple moving objects.

Authors:  Christopher Shooner; Srimant P Tripathy; Harold E Bedell; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Non-retinotopic feature processing in the absence of retinotopic spatial layout and the construction of perceptual space from motion.

Authors:  Mehmet N Ağaoğlu; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.