Literature DB >> 21047740

Attention and non-retinotopic feature integration.

Thomas U Otto1, Haluk Öğmen, Michael H Herzog.   

Abstract

Features of moving objects are non-retinotopically integrated along their motion trajectories as demonstrated by a variety of recent studies. The mechanisms of non-retinotopic feature integration are largely unknown. Here, we investigated the role of attention in non-retinotopic feature integration by using the sequential metacontrast paradigm. A central line was offset either to the left or right. A sequence of flanking lines followed eliciting the percept of two diverging motion streams. Although the central line was invisible, its offset was perceived within the streams. Observers attended to one stream. If an offset was introduced to one of the flanking lines in the attended stream, this offset integrated with the central line offset. No integration occurred when the offset was in the non-attended stream. Here, we manipulated the allocation of attention by using an auditory cueing paradigm. First, we show that mandatory non-retinotopic integration occurred even when the cue came long after the motion sequence. Second, we used more than two streams of which two could merge. Offsets in different streams were integrated when the streams merged. However, offsets of one stream were not integrated when this stream had to be ignored. We propose a hierarchical two stage model, in which motion grouping determines mandatory feature integration while attention selects motion streams for optional feature integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047740      PMCID: PMC3248829          DOI: 10.1167/10.12.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  30 in total

1.  The maintenance of apparent luminance of an object.

Authors:  S S Shimozaki; M Eckstein; J P Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Multielement visual tracking: attention and perceptual organization.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information.

Authors:  D Kahneman; A Treisman; B J Gibbs
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem.

Authors:  M R Dawson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.

Authors:  S He; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The role of location indexes in spatial perception: a sketch of the FINST spatial-index model.

Authors:  Z Pylyshyn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-06

9.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn; R W Storm
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1988

10.  fMRI of human visual cortex.

Authors:  S A Engel; D E Rumelhart; B A Wandell; A T Lee; G H Glover; E J Chichilnisky; M N Shadlen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-06-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Barrier effects in non-retinotopic feature attribution.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Attention modulates spatio-temporal grouping.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The fate of visible features of invisible elements.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Thomas U Otto; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-27

4.  Visual percepts modify iconic memory in humans.

Authors:  Yoichi Sugita; Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Microsaccadic Eye Movements but not Pupillary Dilation Response Characterizes the Crossmodal Freezing Effect.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Hsin-I Liao
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-09-30

Review 6.  The temporal window of individuation limits visual capacity.

Authors:  Andreas Wutz; David Melcher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-27

7.  A New Conceptualization of Human Visual Sensory-Memory.

Authors:  Haluk Öğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-09

Review 8.  Information Integration and Information Storage in Retinotopic and Non-Retinotopic Sensory Memory.

Authors:  Haluk Öğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.