Literature DB >> 21767561

Barrier effects in non-retinotopic feature attribution.

Murat Aydın1, Michael H Herzog, Haluk Oğmen.   

Abstract

When objects move in the environment, their retinal images can undergo drastic changes and features of different objects can be inter-mixed in the retinal image. Notwithstanding these changes and ambiguities, the visual system is capable of establishing correctly feature-object relationships as well as maintaining individual identities of objects through space and time. Recently, by using a Ternus-Pikler display, we have shown that perceived motion correspondences serve as the medium for non-retinotopic attribution of features to objects. The purpose of the work reported in this manuscript was to assess whether perceived motion correspondences provide a sufficient condition for feature attribution. Our results show that the introduction of a static "barrier" stimulus can interfere with the feature attribution process. Our results also indicate that the barrier stops feature attribution based on interferences related to the feature attribution process itself rather than on mechanisms related to perceived motion.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767561      PMCID: PMC3152686          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  35 in total

1.  The maintenance of apparent luminance of an object.

Authors:  S S Shimozaki; M Eckstein; J P Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  CONTOUR INTERACTION AND VISUAL RESOLUTION: CONTRALATERAL EFFECTS.

Authors:  M C FLOM; G G HEATH; E TAKAHASHI
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The flight path of the phoenix--the visible trace of invisible elements in human vision.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Oğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Tracking unique objects.

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Sarah B Klieger; David E Fencsik; Kevin K Yang; George A Alvarez; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-02

6.  Assessing the microstructure of motion correspondences with non-retinotopic feature attribution.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Oğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery.

Authors:  R J Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Haluk Oğmen; Joseph Krummenacher; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Eye movements during multiple object tracking: where do participants look?

Authors:  Hilda M Fehd; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-12-21

10.  Mobile computation: spatiotemporal integration of the properties of objects in motion.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Alex O Holcombe; Weilun Chou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The fate of visible features of invisible elements.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Thomas U Otto; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.