Literature DB >> 22929811

Non-retinotopic feature processing in the absence of retinotopic spatial layout and the construction of perceptual space from motion.

Mehmet N Ağaoğlu1, Michael H Herzog, Haluk Oğmen.   

Abstract

The spatial representation of a visual scene in the early visual system is well known. The optics of the eye map the three-dimensional environment onto two-dimensional images on the retina. These retinotopic representations are preserved in the early visual system. Retinotopic representations and processing are among the most prevalent concepts in visual neuroscience. However, it has long been known that a retinotopic representation of the stimulus is neither sufficient nor necessary for perception. Saccadic Stimulus Presentation Paradigm and the Ternus-Pikler displays have been used to investigate non-retinotopic processes with and without eye movements, respectively. However, neither of these paradigms eliminates the retinotopic representation of the spatial layout of the stimulus. Here, we investigated how stimulus features are processed in the absence of a retinotopic layout and in the presence of retinotopic conflict. We used anorthoscopic viewing (slit viewing) and pitted a retinotopic feature-processing hypothesis against a non-retinotopic feature-processing hypothesis. Our results support the predictions of the non-retinotopic feature-processing hypothesis and demonstrate the ability of the visual system to operate non-retinotopically at a fine feature processing level in the absence of a retinotopic spatial layout. Our results suggest that perceptual space is actively constructed from the perceptual dimension of motion. The implications of these findings for normal ecological viewing conditions are discussed. 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22929811      PMCID: PMC3472132          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  31 in total

1.  The maintenance of apparent luminance of an object.

Authors:  S S Shimozaki; M Eckstein; J P Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Where does an anorthoscopic image appear?

Authors:  T Sohmiya; K Sohmiya
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1992-12

3.  Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Target recovery in metacontrast: the effect of contrast.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen; Bruno G Breitmeyer; Steven Todd; Lynn Mardon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  "Seeing" shapes that are almost totally occluded: a new look at Parks's camel.

Authors:  S Shimojo; W Richards
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-06

6.  Anorthoscopic perception.

Authors:  I Rock
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Haluk Oğmen; Joseph Krummenacher; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

9.  The emergence of perceived position in the visual system.

Authors:  Jason Fischer; Nicole Spotswood; David Whitney
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  What is a crucial determinant in anorthoscopic perception?

Authors:  T Sohmiya; K Sohmiya
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-06
View more
  7 in total

1.  Temporal modulation improves dynamic peripheral acuity.

Authors:  Jonathan A Patrick; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Extrastriate Visual Areas Integrate Form Features over Space and Time to Construct Representations of Stationary and Rigidly Rotating Objects.

Authors:  J Daniel McCarthy; Peter J Kohler; Peter U Tse; Gideon Paul Caplovitz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Spatiotemporal Form Integration: sequentially presented inducers can lead to representations of stationary and rigidly rotating objects.

Authors:  J Daniel McCarthy; Lars Strother; Gideon Paul Caplovitz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Object identity determines trans-saccadic integration.

Authors:  Leila Drissi-Daoudi; Haluk Ögmen; Michael H Herzog; Guido Marco Cicchini
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Differences between chimpanzees and humans in visual temporal integration.

Authors:  Tomoko Imura; Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  The temporal window of individuation limits visual capacity.

Authors:  Andreas Wutz; David Melcher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-27

7.  A New Conceptualization of Human Visual Sensory-Memory.

Authors:  Haluk Öğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.