Literature DB >> 20884557

High-capacity, transient retention of direction-of-motion information for multiple moving objects.

Christopher Shooner1, Srimant P Tripathy, Harold E Bedell, Haluk Ogmen.   

Abstract

The multiple-object tracking paradigm (MOT) has been used extensively for studying dynamic visual attention, but the basic mechanisms which subserve this capability are as yet unknown. Among the unresolved issues surrounding MOT are the relative importance of motion (as opposed to positional) information and the role of various memory mechanisms. We sought to quantify the capacity and dynamics for retention of direction-of-motion information when viewing a multiple-object motion stimulus similar to those used in MOT. Observers viewed three to nine objects in random linear motion and then reported motion direction after motion ended. Using a partial-report paradigm and varying the parameters of set size and time of retention, we found evidence for two complementary memory systems, one transient with high capacity and a second sustained system with low capacity. For the transient high-capacity memory, retention capacity was equally high whether object motion lasted several seconds or a fraction of a second. Also, a graded deterioration in performance with increased set size lends support to a flexible-capacity theory of MOT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884557      PMCID: PMC3248821          DOI: 10.1167/10.6.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  32 in total

Review 1.  The psychophysics of perceptual memory.

Authors:  S Magnussen; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1999

2.  A neural correlate of working memory in the monkey primary visual cortex.

Authors:  H Supèr; H Spekreijse; V A Lamme
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The mathematics of multiple object tracking: from proportions correct to number of objects tracked.

Authors:  Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Assessing the microstructure of motion correspondences with non-retinotopic feature attribution.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Oğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory.

Authors:  Sathyasri Narasimhan; Srimant P Tripathy; Brendan T Barrett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Temporal summation of visual motion.

Authors:  W A Simpson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Haluk Oğmen; Joseph Krummenacher; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Attention and non-retinotopic feature integration.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Öğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Zhong; Zheng Ma; Colin Wilson; Yan Liu; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Misperceptions in the trajectories of objects undergoing curvilinear motion.

Authors:  Ozgur Yilmaz; Srimant P Tripathy; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Bottlenecks of motion processing during a visual glance: the leaky flask model.

Authors:  Haluk Öğmen; Onur Ekiz; Duong Huynh; Harold E Bedell; Srimant P Tripathy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The role of kinematic properties in multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Edward Vul
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A closer look at four-dot masking of a foveated target.

Authors:  Marwan Daar; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Sensory Memory Is Allocated Exclusively to the Current Event-Segment.

Authors:  Srimant P Tripathy; Haluk Öǧmen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-07

8.  Capacity and Allocation across Sensory and Short-Term Memories.

Authors:  Shaoying Wang; Srimant P Tripathy; Haluk Öğmen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.