Literature DB >> 20053104

A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding.

Benjamin Balas1, Lisa Nakano, Ruth Rosenholtz.   

Abstract

Peripheral vision provides a less faithful representation of the visual input than foveal vision. Nonetheless, we can gain a lot of information about the world from our peripheral vision, for example in order to plan eye movements. The phenomenon of crowding shows that the reduction of information available in the periphery is not merely the result of reduced resolution. Crowding refers to visual phenomena in which identification of a target stimulus is significantly impaired by the presence of nearby stimuli, or flankers. What information is available in the periphery? We propose that the visual system locally represents peripheral stimuli by the joint statistics of responses of cells sensitive to different position, phase, orientation, and scale. This "textural" representation by summary statistics predicts the subjective "jumble" of features often associated with crowding. We show that the difficulty of performing an identification task within a single pooling region using this representation of the stimuli is correlated with peripheral identification performance under conditions of crowding. Furthermore, for a simple stimulus with no flankers, this representation can be adequate to specify the stimulus with some position invariance. This provides evidence that a unified neuronal mechanism may underlie peripheral vision, ordinary pattern recognition in central vision, and texture perception. A key component of our methodology involves creating visualizations of the information available in the summary statistics of a stimulus. We call these visualizations "mongrels" and show that they are highly useful in examining how the early visual system represents the visual input. Mongrels enable one to study the "equivalence classes" of our model, i.e., the sets of stimuli that map to the same representation according to the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20053104      PMCID: PMC2923917          DOI: 10.1167/9.12.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  35 in total

1.  Retinal stimulation by light substitution.

Authors:  K O DONNER; W A RUSHTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Melanie Palomares; Najib J Majaj
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Texture synthesis and perception: using computational models to study texture representations in the human visual system.

Authors:  Benjamin J Balas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities.

Authors:  Isamu Motoyoshi; Shin'ya Nishida; Lavanya Sharan; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The three dimensions of human visual sensitivity to first-order contrast statistics.

Authors:  Charles Chubb; Jong-Ho Nam; Daniel R Bindman; George Sperling
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  On the generality of crowding: visual crowding in size, saturation, and hue compared to orientation.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Jos B T M Roerdink; Frans W Cornelissen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  An escape from crowding.

Authors:  Jeremy Freeman; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A crowding model of visual clutter.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Frans W Cornelissen; Jos B T M Roerdink
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  The uncrowded window of object recognition.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Katharine A Tillman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: seeing the forest without representing the trees.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  100 in total

1.  Visual crowding is correlated with awareness.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Neural responses to natural and model-matched stimuli reveal distinct computations in primary and nonprimary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam V Norman-Haignere; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Visual crowding in V1.

Authors:  Rachel Millin; A Cyrus Arman; Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Macaque monkeys experience visual crowding.

Authors:  Erin A Crowder; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Bilge Sayim; Vitaly Chicherov; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Image statistics underlying natural texture selectivity of neurons in macaque V4.

Authors:  Gouki Okazawa; Satohiro Tajima; Hidehiko Komatsu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Emma Zilber; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The Bouma law of crowding, revised: critical spacing is equal across parts, not objects.

Authors:  Sarah Rosen; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.

Authors:  Krista A Ehinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.