Literature DB >> 16592610

Efficiency of truncation selection.

J F Crow1, M Kimura.   

Abstract

Truncation selection is known to be the most efficient form of directional selection. When this is modified so that the fitness increases linearly over a range of one or two standard deviations of the value of the selected character, the efficiency is reduced, but not greatly. When truncation selection is compared to a system in which fitness is strictly proportional to the character value, the relative efficiency of truncation selection is given by f(c)/sigma, in which f(c) is the ordinate of the frequency distribution at the truncation point and sigma is the standard deviation of the character. It is shown, for mutations affecting viability in Drosophila, that truncation selection or reasonable departures therefrom can reduce the mutation load greatly. This may be one way to reconcile the very high mutation rate of such genes with a small mutation load. The truncation model with directional selection is appropriate for this situation because of the approximate additivity of these mutations. On the other hand, it is doubtful that this simple model can be applied to all genes affecting fitness, for which there are intermediate optima and antagonistic selection among components with negative correlations. Whether nature ranks and truncates, or approximates this behavior, is an empirical question, yet to be answered.

Entities:  

Year:  1979        PMID: 16592610      PMCID: PMC382946          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  19 in total

1.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY.

Authors:  T MUKAI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Negative correction between rate of development and female fertility in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y HIRAIZUMI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selection differentials and selection coefficients.

Authors:  R Milkman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A Comparison of the Effect of Lethal and Detrimental Chromosomes from Drosophila Populations.

Authors:  R Greenberg; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1960-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Heterosis as a major cause of heterozygosity in nature.

Authors:  R D Milkman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Rank-order selection is capable of maintaining all genetic polymorphisms.

Authors:  C Wills
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness.

Authors:  M Kimura; T Maruyama
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations.

Authors:  O Ohnishi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Heterozygous effects on fitness of EMS-treated chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M J Simmons; E W Sheldon; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

View more
  43 in total

1.  Consequences of nonadaptive alterations in cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Kamb
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Interlocus nonrandom association of polymorphisms in Drosophila chemoreceptor genes.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu; Akira Kawabe; Nobuyuki Inomata; Noriko Nanba; Rumi Kondo; Yutaka Inoue; Masanobu Itoh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  An ancient founder mutation in PROKR2 impairs human reproduction.

Authors:  Magdalena Avbelj Stefanija; Marc Jeanpierre; Gerasimos P Sykiotis; Jacques Young; Richard Quinton; Ana Paula Abreu; Lacey Plummer; Margaret G Au; Ravikumar Balasubramanian; Andrew A Dwyer; Jose C Florez; Timothy Cheetham; Simon H Pearce; Radhika Purushothaman; Albert Schinzel; Michel Pugeat; Elka E Jacobson-Dickman; Svetlana Ten; Ana Claudia Latronico; James F Gusella; Catherine Dode; William F Crowley; Nelly Pitteloud
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Genomic compatibility occurs over a wide range of parental genetic similarity in an outcrossing plant.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Josh Van Buskirk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  H. J. Muller and the "competition hoax".

Authors:  James F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Average time until fixation of a mutant allele in a finite population under continued mutation pressure: Studies by analytical, numerical, and pseudo-sampling methods.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Maintaining evolvability.

Authors:  James F Crow
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  A nonadaptive origin of a beneficial trait: in silico selection for free energy of folding leads to the neutral emergence of mutational robustness in single domain proteins.

Authors:  Rafael F Pagan; Steven E Massey
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Selection methods regulate evolution of cooperation in digital evolution.

Authors:  Pawel Lichocki; Dario Floreano; Laurent Keller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.